《京华烟云》模糊语维译研究

发布时间：2018-06-29 13:29

本文选题：模糊语 + 翻译　；参考：《喀什大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：自从扎德(1965)提出模糊理论以来,关于模糊现象的研究就运用在不同学科中,其中数学领域和语言学领域最为突出,国外学者雷克夫和维特根斯坦分别从模糊语义和范畴化理论在扎德提出的模糊理论基础上对语言学中模糊语作出深入研究。我国学者伍铁平(1995)最早将模糊理论引入国内。随后国内学者分别从语义、语法、修辞、语用、翻译等多角度对模糊语进行研究。众所周知,翻译不是简单的人工转码,需要结合译者的素养和翻译方法,对模糊语翻译的好坏决定了翻译成果的成功与失败。本文以林语堂《京华烟云》汉文版本和扎克尔江·米吉提维译版本为语料。自行建立汉维双语平行语料库,结合刘宓庆(2012)翻译方法论,将模糊语理论与汉维翻译结合,扩宽模糊理论研究范围,加深对汉维模糊形式认识,为模糊语维译提供新思路。本论文共分三个部分,第一部分,对比分析汉维模糊形式不同,找出汉维模糊形式差异性表现。第二部分,对模糊语概念界定,从静态语义模糊和动态语用模糊角度对《京华烟云》模糊语分类说明,语义模糊着重分析时间词、数词和颜色词,语用模糊着重分析委婉语和幽默语。第三部分,结合刘宓庆(2012)翻译理论,提出模糊语翻译应该以适应性原则和审美原则为指导。模糊语维译适用于对应法、音译法、转换法、还原法、解释法等。通过这三个方面的论证,以提高译者对模糊语翻译处理的能力,通过汉维模糊形式对比,结合具体翻译方法,为今后其它研究者提供参考价值,为汉维双语教学提供理论依据。
[Abstract]:Since Zadeh (1965) put forward the fuzzy theory, the research on fuzzy phenomenon has been applied in different disciplines, especially in the field of mathematics and linguistics. Foreign scholars Rakoff and Wittgenstein have made an in-depth study of fuzzy language in linguistics on the basis of Zadeh's fuzzy theory on the basis of fuzzy semantics and categorization theory. Chinese scholar Wu Tieping (1995) first introduced fuzzy theory into China. Then domestic scholars study vague language from semantic, grammatical, rhetorical, pragmatic and translation perspectives. It is well known that translation is not a simple manual transcoding. It is necessary to combine the translator's literacy and translation methods. The success and failure of translation results are determined by the quality of fuzzy translation. In this paper, the Chinese version of Lin Yutang "Jinghua Yanyun" and the translation version of Zaquel River Mijtivi are used as the corpus. A bilingual parallel corpus of Chinese and Uygur has been established, combined with Liu Mi Qing's translation methodology (2012), to broaden the scope of the study of fuzzy theory by combining fuzzy theory with Chinese-Uyghur translation, and to deepen the understanding of Chinese and Uygur forms of vagueness, thus providing a new way of thinking for the translation of fuzzy language into Uygur. This paper is divided into three parts. In the first part, we compare and analyze the different fuzzy forms of Chinese and Uygur, and find out the difference of fuzzy forms of Chinese and Uygur. In the second part, the concept of fuzzy language is defined. From the angle of static semantic ambiguity and dynamic pragmatic vagueness, the fuzzy words are classified and explained. The semantic ambiguity focuses on the analysis of time words, numerals and color words. Pragmatic vagueness focuses on euphemism and humor. The third part, based on Liu Miqing's translation theory (2012), puts forward that fuzzy language translation should be guided by adaptability and aesthetic principles. Fuzzy translation is applicable to correspondence, transliteration, conversion, reduction, interpretation and so on. Through these three aspects of the argument to improve the translator's ability to deal with vague language translation, through the Chinese-Uygur fuzzy form comparison, combined with specific translation methods, for other researchers in the future to provide a theoretical basis for Chinese-Uygur bilingual teaching.
【学位授予单位】：喀什大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H215

【相似文献】