中国译学研究须加强逻辑思维

发布时间：2018-08-15 16:15

【摘要】：在当今中国译学界,不少理论书籍和文章中都存在着概念模糊、词语歧义、类属不辨、自相矛盾、以偏概全、妄下结论等逻辑谬误:如"意义不确定""文学作品=诗""自译=自残""翻译=改写"等等。这些存在逻辑谬误的论断在当今翻译学界有一定的影响,因而对广大学养尚浅、判断力不足的青年学子造成了误导。事实上,运用逻辑思维加以分析,我们就会发现,所谓的"意义不确定"是个可自证其伪的判断,"文学作品=诗"是属种不辨的划分,"自译=自残"属于错误类比,"翻译=改写"则是个因过度概括而导致的伪命题。由此可见,中国译学界需要重视和加强逻辑思维,青年学子读书不可尽信书中之言,而应该运用逻辑思维,仔细推敲,用心思量,辨伪求真。
[Abstract]:In today's Chinese translation circles, there are many theoretical books and articles with vague concepts, ambiguous words, undistinguished categories, contradictions, and partial generalizations. Logical fallacies such as "meaning uncertainty", "Literary works = Poems", "Self-Translation = Self-harm", "Translation = rewriting" and so on. These arguments of logic fallacy have a certain influence in the field of translation nowadays, and thus mislead the young students who have a shallow education and poor judgment. In fact, if we use logical thinking to analyze it, we will find that, The so-called "meaning uncertainty" is a false judgment, "literary works = poetry" is the division of genus and species, "self-translation = self-harm" is a false analogy, "translation = rewriting" is a false proposition caused by overgeneralization. From this we can see that the Chinese translation circle should pay attention to and strengthen the logical thinking. The young students can't believe the words in the books but they should use logical thinking carefully think carefully and discriminate the false and the truth.
【作者单位】：四川大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：H059

【相似文献】