系统功能语言学认知转向辩证
发布时间：2018-08-31 19:34
【摘要】：国内学者依据Halliday和Matthiessen突显“认知”这一事实,指出系统功能语言学发生认知转向。该论断与系统功能语言学基于生物体间而非生物体内的研究取向冲突,其理论误导性不容小觑。以系统功能语言学主要分支悉尼语法对“认知”的解读为出发点,以具身认知三大原则为参照,再与系统功能语言学的另一分支加的夫语法作对比,可回答系统功能语言学是否发生认知转向。研究发现,系统功能语言学突显认知的目的在于借认知提出与认知科学互为补充的意义构建观,系统功能语言学基于生物体间的研究取向并未改变,对加的夫语法的认知-互动观仍持保留意见,故而系统功能语言学发生认知转向的论断不成立。
[Abstract]:Based on the fact that Halliday and Matthiessen highlight "cognition", domestic scholars point out that there is a cognitive turn in systemic functional linguistics. This thesis conflicts with the systematic functional linguistics, which is based on the research orientation of organisms rather than organisms, and its theoretical misleading cannot be underestimated. Based on the interpretation of "cognition" in Sydney grammar, the main branch of systemic functional linguistics, and referring to the three principles of "body cognition", this paper makes a comparison with Cardiff's grammar, another branch of systemic functional linguistics. It is possible to answer whether there is a cognitive turn in systemic functional linguistics. It is found that the purpose of systemic functional linguistics in highlighting cognition is to put forward a concept of meaning construction that complements cognitive science through cognition, and that the orientation of systematic functional linguistics based on the study of organisms has not changed. There are still reservations about the cognitive-interactive view of Cardiff grammar, so the theory of cognitive turn in systemic functional linguistics does not hold true.
【作者单位】： 重庆科技学院外国语学院;四川外国语大学国际教育学院;上海交通大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：H0-0
本文编号：2215958
[Abstract]:Based on the fact that Halliday and Matthiessen highlight "cognition", domestic scholars point out that there is a cognitive turn in systemic functional linguistics. This thesis conflicts with the systematic functional linguistics, which is based on the research orientation of organisms rather than organisms, and its theoretical misleading cannot be underestimated. Based on the interpretation of "cognition" in Sydney grammar, the main branch of systemic functional linguistics, and referring to the three principles of "body cognition", this paper makes a comparison with Cardiff's grammar, another branch of systemic functional linguistics. It is possible to answer whether there is a cognitive turn in systemic functional linguistics. It is found that the purpose of systemic functional linguistics in highlighting cognition is to put forward a concept of meaning construction that complements cognitive science through cognition, and that the orientation of systematic functional linguistics based on the study of organisms has not changed. There are still reservations about the cognitive-interactive view of Cardiff grammar, so the theory of cognitive turn in systemic functional linguistics does not hold true.
【作者单位】： 重庆科技学院外国语学院;四川外国语大学国际教育学院;上海交通大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：H0-0
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前2条
1 张德禄;;系统功能语言学对计算机辅助外语教学的启示[A];全国大学英语教学改革暨网络环境下外语教学学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
2 杨传智;;试用评价理论来分析“天价切糕”事件网友的评论[A];福建省外国语文学会2012年会论文集[C];2012年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 赵俊海;阿尔茨海默症患者话语的系统功能语言学研究[D];西南大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 徐晓敏;诗歌《当你老了》及其汉译文的系统功能语言学研究[D];内蒙古大学;2015年
2 王珊珊;系统功能语言学下的花园路径现象研究[D];北华大学;2015年
3 马敏霞;系统功能语言学和关联理论的互补性研究[D];苏州大学;2006年
4 薛国瑜;系统功能语言学在大学外贸英语函电教学中的应用研究[D];厦门大学;2014年
5 王艳;基于功能语言学理论的机器翻译质量评估[D];中国海洋大学;2009年
6 王欢;基于系统功能语言学的语境教学法在高中英语阅读课堂的应用研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2014年
7 贺莉君;英语动词化现象的系统功能语言学阐释[D];湖南科技大学;2007年
8 乐丽萍;系统功能语言学语境观与广告语篇的翻译[D];江西师范大学;2007年
9 寿振炜;博客篇类的系统功能语言学研究[D];外交学院;2007年
10 曹静;语篇动态性的系统功能语言学研究[D];河北大学;2007年
，本文编号：2215958
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2215958.html
