汉语单字句的语用逻辑探究
发布时间：2018-11-23 13:35
【摘要】：塞尔和范德维肯等人设想并构建了一个可用于具体言语行为形式化的语用逻辑系统,然而,他们对于言语行为以及语用力量的分类却存在着含混、互相包含的缺陷。从汉语中单字句的独特语言现象的视角重新审视语用逻辑体系,可以得出以下结论:(1)对于单字句的言语行为的关注与研究,弥补了只以句子为基本分析单位的不足,提出了新的研究对象,极大地扩展了塞尔等人所倡导的言语行为理论研究的视野以及研究领域。(2)许多单字式行为式动词并不仅仅对应着一个确定的语用力量,相反,它们代表着一种独特的类。(3)通过单字句可以看出实际认知过程中语用力量的七种要素的重要程度不尽相同。
[Abstract]:Searle and van der Viken have conceived and constructed a pragmatic logic system which can be used in the formalization of specific speech acts. However, their classification of speech acts and pragmatic power has some defects such as ambiguity and mutual inclusion. Reviewing the pragmatic logic system from the perspective of the unique linguistic phenomena of single-character sentences in Chinese, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) the focus and research on the speech acts of single-character sentences make up for the deficiency of only taking sentences as the basic unit of analysis; A new research object is proposed, which greatly expands the perspective and research field of speech act theory advocated by Searle et al. (2) many monographs do not only correspond to a certain pragmatic force, but on the contrary. They represent a unique class. (3) it can be seen that the seven elements of pragmatic power in the actual cognitive process are of different importance through single-character sentences.
【作者单位】： 南京大学哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文基地重大项目(13JJD720018) 国家社会科学基金项目(15BZX082),国家社会科学基金项目(14ZDB013)
【分类号】：H0-05
，
本文编号：2351784
[Abstract]:Searle and van der Viken have conceived and constructed a pragmatic logic system which can be used in the formalization of specific speech acts. However, their classification of speech acts and pragmatic power has some defects such as ambiguity and mutual inclusion. Reviewing the pragmatic logic system from the perspective of the unique linguistic phenomena of single-character sentences in Chinese, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) the focus and research on the speech acts of single-character sentences make up for the deficiency of only taking sentences as the basic unit of analysis; A new research object is proposed, which greatly expands the perspective and research field of speech act theory advocated by Searle et al. (2) many monographs do not only correspond to a certain pragmatic force, but on the contrary. They represent a unique class. (3) it can be seen that the seven elements of pragmatic power in the actual cognitive process are of different importance through single-character sentences.
【作者单位】： 南京大学哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文基地重大项目(13JJD720018) 国家社会科学基金项目(15BZX082),国家社会科学基金项目(14ZDB013)
【分类号】：H0-05
，
本文编号：2351784
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2351784.html
