网络新闻评论中言语不礼貌的语用分析
发布时间：2019-03-11 08:17
【摘要】：自学界将不礼貌作为独立的研究议题以来,研究者们从多视角研究了不同语境下的不礼貌现象。不礼貌的话语分析法强调不礼貌并非某种固定不变的概念,而是一种由交际双方在互动中共同构建、取决于说话者和听话者理解和判断的概念。基于这种话语分析思想,结合网络语境中大量言语不礼貌现象,本文试图以网络新闻评论互动话语为研究对象,主要探究了两个问题:第一,网络新闻评论中不礼貌话语的实现方式及其基本特征;第二,语言使用者对不礼貌话语的评价及不礼貌现象的成因。本研究采取定性与定量相结合的混合型方法,对新闻网站收集的读者评论互动语料进行不礼貌策略的识别、归类及统计分析;依据新闻评论中比较典型的不礼貌话语,设计了一份关于不礼貌的评价问卷进行调查。通过填写者对不礼貌话语及其影响因素的判断,探究语言使用者对不礼貌现象的评价及不礼貌现象产生的成因。研究发现网络新闻评论互动中主要呈现10种不礼貌策略,分别为:挑战、使用禁忌语、负面联系、使用身份标记、讽刺、诅咒、嘲笑、有意忽视、异议以及阻止。对这些策略进行统计分析,结果表明:使用禁忌语(30%)和挑战(27%)为最高频率的不礼貌策略;而忽视(2%)和阻止(2%)则很少使用。就策略使用的整体趋势而言,研究结果显示新闻评论者更倾向于使用直接、公开的不礼貌策略(81%)。问卷调查结果还表明禁忌语、负面联系及讽刺三种策略的不礼貌程度最高。而对不同语言使用者所作的不礼貌评价的比较结果显示:不同年龄的被试对言语不礼貌的认识和判断差异较大,不同性别、受教育程度的被试则未体现明显差异。研究进一步对影响不礼貌产生的因素进行了探讨,论证了网络语境的匿名性、非面对面性,交际参与者发泄情感的需求以及话题性质等因素均对不礼貌现象的产生有较大影响。本研究通过对网络语境下言语不礼貌现象的探讨,丰富了不礼貌研究的素材。此外,问卷调查探索了语言使用者对不礼貌的评价及不礼貌现象的形成因由,有助于进一步完善研究者对不礼貌现象的认识,对不礼貌现象的研究具有一定的参考价值与指导意义。
[Abstract]:Since the academic circle regards impoliteness as an independent research topic, researchers have studied the phenomenon of impoliteness in different contexts from multiple perspectives. Impolite discourse analysis emphasizes that impoliteness is not a fixed concept, but a concept constructed jointly by both sides of the communication, depending on the understanding and judgment of the speaker and the listener. Based on this thought of discourse analysis, combined with a large number of verbal impoliteness in the network context, this paper attempts to take the interactive discourse of online news commentary as the research object, and mainly explores two problems: first, the paper discusses the following two problems: firstly, The realization of impolite discourse in network news review and its basic features; Second, the evaluation of impolite discourse by language users and the causes of impoliteness. In this study, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods is adopted to identify, classify and statistically analyze the interactive corpus of readers' comments collected by news websites. According to the typical impolite discourse in news review, a questionnaire about impoliteness is designed to carry out an investigation. Through the author's judgment of impoliteness and its influencing factors, this paper explores the evaluation of impoliteness by language users and the causes of impoliteness. The study finds that there are 10 kinds of impolite strategies in the interaction of online news reviews: challenge, use of taboos, negative connections, use of identity marks, satire, curse, ridicule, intentional neglect, dissent and dissent. Statistical analysis of these strategies shows that the use of taboos (30%) and challenges (27%) is the highest frequency of impolite strategies, while neglect (2%) and blocking (2%) are rarely used. As far as the overall trend of strategy use is concerned, the results show that news commentators are more inclined to use direct, open and impolite strategies (81%). The results of the questionnaire also showed that taboos, negative links and satire had the highest degree of impoliteness. The comparative results of different language users' impoliteness evaluation showed that the cognition and judgment of verbal impoliteness were different among subjects of different ages, but there were no significant differences among subjects of different gender and education level. 3. The results showed that there was no significant difference between subjects of different age and age in their cognition and judgment of verbal impoliteness. The study further discusses the factors that affect the emergence of impoliteness, and demonstrates that the anonymity, non-reciprocity of network context, the need for communication participants to vent emotions and the nature of topics all have a great impact on the emergence of impoliteness. This study enriches the material for the study of impoliteness by discussing the phenomenon of verbal impoliteness in the network context. In addition, the questionnaire explores the language users' evaluation of impoliteness and the reasons for the formation of impoliteness phenomenon, which is helpful to further improve the researchers' understanding of impoliteness phenomenon. The research on the phenomenon of impoliteness has certain reference value and instructive significance.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H030
本文编号：2438117
[Abstract]:Since the academic circle regards impoliteness as an independent research topic, researchers have studied the phenomenon of impoliteness in different contexts from multiple perspectives. Impolite discourse analysis emphasizes that impoliteness is not a fixed concept, but a concept constructed jointly by both sides of the communication, depending on the understanding and judgment of the speaker and the listener. Based on this thought of discourse analysis, combined with a large number of verbal impoliteness in the network context, this paper attempts to take the interactive discourse of online news commentary as the research object, and mainly explores two problems: first, the paper discusses the following two problems: firstly, The realization of impolite discourse in network news review and its basic features; Second, the evaluation of impolite discourse by language users and the causes of impoliteness. In this study, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods is adopted to identify, classify and statistically analyze the interactive corpus of readers' comments collected by news websites. According to the typical impolite discourse in news review, a questionnaire about impoliteness is designed to carry out an investigation. Through the author's judgment of impoliteness and its influencing factors, this paper explores the evaluation of impoliteness by language users and the causes of impoliteness. The study finds that there are 10 kinds of impolite strategies in the interaction of online news reviews: challenge, use of taboos, negative connections, use of identity marks, satire, curse, ridicule, intentional neglect, dissent and dissent. Statistical analysis of these strategies shows that the use of taboos (30%) and challenges (27%) is the highest frequency of impolite strategies, while neglect (2%) and blocking (2%) are rarely used. As far as the overall trend of strategy use is concerned, the results show that news commentators are more inclined to use direct, open and impolite strategies (81%). The results of the questionnaire also showed that taboos, negative links and satire had the highest degree of impoliteness. The comparative results of different language users' impoliteness evaluation showed that the cognition and judgment of verbal impoliteness were different among subjects of different ages, but there were no significant differences among subjects of different gender and education level. 3. The results showed that there was no significant difference between subjects of different age and age in their cognition and judgment of verbal impoliteness. The study further discusses the factors that affect the emergence of impoliteness, and demonstrates that the anonymity, non-reciprocity of network context, the need for communication participants to vent emotions and the nature of topics all have a great impact on the emergence of impoliteness. This study enriches the material for the study of impoliteness by discussing the phenomenon of verbal impoliteness in the network context. In addition, the questionnaire explores the language users' evaluation of impoliteness and the reasons for the formation of impoliteness phenomenon, which is helpful to further improve the researchers' understanding of impoliteness phenomenon. The research on the phenomenon of impoliteness has certain reference value and instructive significance.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H030
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张玮;谢朝群;;网络语境下不礼貌语用与身份建构分析——以微博研究为例[J];当代外语研究;2015年05期
2 赖小玉;;家庭冲突中强势反对的不礼貌研究[J];现代外语;2014年01期
3 陈倩;冉永平;;有意不礼貌环境下身份构建的和谐-挑战语用取向[J];外语与外语教学;2013年06期
4 赖小玉;;人际关系管理语用观下言语不礼貌的分析[J];天津外国语大学学报;2013年03期
5 赖小玉;;婆媳冲突中有意不礼貌语言现象的语用分析[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2012年02期
6 周丹;;不礼貌言语行为研究综述[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2011年08期
7 冉永平;杨巍;;人际冲突中有意冒犯性话语的语用分析[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2011年03期
8 杨子;;策略性言语不礼貌空间建构方案的顺应性考察[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
9 谢世坚;;语言非礼貌现象及非礼貌理论的完善[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年05期
10 涂志成;谢莉;;尊重言语的不礼貌性探讨[J];四川教育学院学报;2008年10期
，本文编号：2438117
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2438117.html
