中英文公司简介中的模糊限制语的对比分析

发布时间：2019-05-23 20:18

【摘要】：作为模糊语言重要的一部分,模糊限制语在交际中起着举足轻重的作用。这种现象引起了国内外学者的兴趣。近些年来,越来越多的学者在不同领域从语用学层面上研究模糊限制语,并取得了许多成就。但是,在一些特殊文体,例如经济和商业体裁中,模糊限制语的研究并不是特别多,也没有达成共识。模糊限制语应用在各种体裁中。事实上,公司简介的组织也离不开模糊限制语。本论文对中英文公司简介中模糊限制语的使用情况进行了对比分析。具体来说,本文主要回答以下三个问题:(1)中英文公司简介中模糊限制语的分布和实现方式是什么?(2)中英文公司简介中模糊限制语的使用有什么相同点和不同点?(3)基于顺应理论,相同点和不同点的原因是什么?为了回答这几个问题,作者建立了两个小型的语料库去全面分析中英文公司简介中的模糊限制语。两个语料库分别是中文公司简介语料库和英文公司简介语料库。每个语料库由30篇公司简介构成,内容分别来自于每个公司的官方网站。本文根据Prince et al.的观点,把两个语料库中的模糊限制语进行了分类,并对这四类模糊限制语加以统计来分析它们所占比例。与此同时,本文也描述了中英文公司简介中模糊限制语的实现形式,最后,本文对异同点进行了阐述并在顺应理论的指导下解释了原因。作者对公司简介中出现的模糊限制语进行了定量和定性分析。根据数据结果,发现:(1)中英文公司简介中均使用了大量模糊限制语。(2)四种类型的模糊限制语都存在于中英文公司简介中。(3)在中英文公司简介中,变动型模糊限制语出现的频率要高于缓和型模糊限制语。(4)中英文公司简介有类似的模糊限制语的实现形式。(5)英文公司简介中的模糊限制语的数量要比中文公司简介中的要多。(6)对于缓和型模糊限制语而言,在中文公司简介中,间接缓和型用的比较多,而在英文公司简介中直接缓和型使用频繁。(7)中英文公司简介中模糊限制语的偏好不同。因此,从当前的研究可以得出一个结论:模糊限制语在组织公司简介中成为必不可少的一部分,且中英文公司简介中模糊限制语的使用具有一定的差异。根据Verschueren(2000)的顺应理论,模糊限制语是作者在语言形式动态顺应语境这一形式过程中所做出的语言选择。中英文公司简介属于同一种体裁,因此它们的交际目的都是一样的——客观介绍公司情况。鉴于此,中英文公司简介的作者顺应公司简介这一体裁特点,运用了大量的模糊限制语,尤其是变动型模糊限制语来实现交际目的。与此同时,作者运用模糊限制语来像读者表示礼貌和尊敬,来营造良好的交流氛围。不同点主要是中英文公司简介的作者拥有不同的社交世界和心理世界。确切地说,两者具有不同的价值观、顺应不同的人际关机、所处不同的环境以及不同的写作动机。本文通过对公司简介中模糊限制语的调查和探讨,丰富了对这一领域模糊限制语的认识,能够指导公司简介的写作。同时,通过中英文公司简介的对比,能够促进中西方文化的交流。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the fuzzy language, the fuzzy restricted language plays an important role in the communication. This phenomenon has aroused the interest of domestic and foreign scholars. In recent years, more and more scholars have studied the fuzzy limit in different fields from the level of pragmatics and made many achievements. However, in some special style, such as that economic and commercial genre, the study of the fuzzy limit language is not particularly large and there is no consensus. The fuzzy constraints are applied in a variety of genres. In fact, the organization of the company profile cannot be separated from the fuzzy limit. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the use of the fuzzy limit in the introduction of Chinese and English companies. In particular, this article mainly answer three question: (1) what is that distribution and implementation of the fuzzy limit in the introduction of Chinese and English company? (2) What are the same points and different points in the use of the fuzzy limit in the introduction of Chinese and English companies? (3) What is the cause of the same point and difference based on the theory of compliance? In order to answer these questions, the author set up two small corpus to analyze the fuzzy limit in the Chinese and English company's brief. The two corpora are the Chinese company introduction corpus and the English company profile corpus, respectively. Each of the corpora consists of 30 corporate profiles, from the official website of each company, respectively. In this paper, based on the view of Prince et al., the fuzzy limit in two corpora is classified and the proportion of the four categories of fuzzy constraints is analyzed. At the same time, the paper also describes the implementation form of the fuzzy limit in the introduction of Chinese and English companies, and finally, the paper expounds the similarities and differences and explains the reasons under the guidance of the theory of adaptation. The author makes a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the fuzzy limit in the company's brief introduction. Based on the results of the data, it was found that: (1) a large number of fuzzy constraints were used in both Chinese and English company profiles. (2) The four types of fuzzy limits exist in the introduction of Chinese and English companies. (3) In the introduction of Chinese and English companies, the frequency of the change-type fuzzy limit is higher than that of the relaxed fuzzy limit. (4) The Chinese and English company profiles have similar implementation forms. (5) The number of the fuzzy limit in the English company profile is much more than that in the Chinese company profile. (6) In the introduction of the Chinese company, the indirect moderating type is more and more frequently used in the introduction of the Chinese company, and the use of the direct mitigation type is frequent in the introduction of the English company. (7) The preference of the fuzzy limit in the introduction of the Chinese and English company is different. Therefore, a conclusion can be drawn from the current research: the fuzzy limit is an essential part in the introduction of the organization company, and the use of the fuzzy limit in the introduction of the Chinese and English company has a certain difference. According to the adaptation theory of Verschueren (2000), the fuzzy limit is the language choice made by the author in the form of the dynamic adaptation of the language form to the context. The introduction of Chinese and English company is the same type, so the purpose of their communication is the same _ objective presentation of the company's situation. In view of this, the author of the introduction of the Chinese and English company is in accordance with the style of the company's brief introduction, and uses a lot of fuzzy constraints, especially the change-type fuzzy limit language to achieve the purpose of communication. At the same time, the author uses the fuzzy limit to express the courtesy and respect of the reader, to create a good communication atmosphere. The difference is that the author of the company of Chinese and English has different social and psychological world. In particular, the two have different values, conform to different interpersonal power-off, different environments and different writing motives. Through the investigation and discussion of the fuzzy limit in the company's brief introduction, this paper enriches the understanding of the fuzzy limit in this field, and can guide the writing of the company profile. At the same time, through the comparison of Chinese and English company profiles, the exchange of Chinese and western culture can be promoted.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H313;H136

【相似文献】