也谈古汉语变读系统中的动名转类机制——兼及“君君臣臣”不变读的原因
发布时间：2019-06-15 01:18
【摘要】：动名变读以非去-去为主,其中动-名型变读盖由既事范畴引申而来,故对结果格外关注,进而兼及受事。在"施事-动作-工具-结果 /受事"这个认知框架内,人的主观注意力由结果 /受事渐次推至工具、施事,故各类语义角色的转喻频率表现为结果 /受事工具施事。这跟认知的凸显原则不一致。而是语法形态、主观注意力、客体凸显度等协同作用的结果。名-动型变读中,动词记录跟名词实体密切相关的特定及物性动作,实体在事件中充当的语义角色有工具受事施事等,这一排序同样跟认知的凸显原则不一致,需从认知处理的角度阐释。古汉语变读系统中没有结果转喻事件的用例,这跟古汉语的语法范畴密切相关。另外动名变读亦涉及清-浊交替,其浊声母一读倾向于表状态。
[Abstract]:The change of name is mainly non-go-go, in which the dynamic-nominal variable reading cover is extended from the subject category, so the results are paid special attention to, and then both the subject and the subject are paid attention to. In the cognitive framework of "agent-action-tool-result / subject", people's subjective attention is gradually pushed from result / subject to tool, so the metonymy frequency of all kinds of semantic roles is expressed as result / subject. This is inconsistent with the principle of cognitive prominence. It is the result of the synergy of grammatical form, subjective attention and object salience. In name-to-dynamic variant reading, verb records are closely related to specific transitivity actions of noun entities, and the semantic roles played by entities in events have tools to be performed, etc. This order is also inconsistent with the prominent principle of cognition and needs to be explained from the perspective of cognitive processing. There are no use cases of metonymy events in the variant reading system of ancient Chinese, which is closely related to the grammatical category of ancient Chinese. In addition, the change of name also involves the alternation of Qing and turbid, and the first reading of turbid consonant tends to appear in the surface state.
【作者单位】： 浙江工商大学人文与传播学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“古汉语变读规律及不变读原因研究”(12CYY032);“基于句法—语义界面的汉语异读构词研究”(13CYY071);国家社科基金重点项目“《经典释文》文献与语言研究”(14ZDB097)
【分类号】：H141
，
本文编号：2499856
[Abstract]:The change of name is mainly non-go-go, in which the dynamic-nominal variable reading cover is extended from the subject category, so the results are paid special attention to, and then both the subject and the subject are paid attention to. In the cognitive framework of "agent-action-tool-result / subject", people's subjective attention is gradually pushed from result / subject to tool, so the metonymy frequency of all kinds of semantic roles is expressed as result / subject. This is inconsistent with the principle of cognitive prominence. It is the result of the synergy of grammatical form, subjective attention and object salience. In name-to-dynamic variant reading, verb records are closely related to specific transitivity actions of noun entities, and the semantic roles played by entities in events have tools to be performed, etc. This order is also inconsistent with the prominent principle of cognition and needs to be explained from the perspective of cognitive processing. There are no use cases of metonymy events in the variant reading system of ancient Chinese, which is closely related to the grammatical category of ancient Chinese. In addition, the change of name also involves the alternation of Qing and turbid, and the first reading of turbid consonant tends to appear in the surface state.
【作者单位】： 浙江工商大学人文与传播学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“古汉语变读规律及不变读原因研究”(12CYY032);“基于句法—语义界面的汉语异读构词研究”(13CYY071);国家社科基金重点项目“《经典释文》文献与语言研究”(14ZDB097)
【分类号】：H141
，
本文编号：2499856
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2499856.html
