元语言否定中的概念整合
发布时间：2019-06-26 10:57
【摘要】：元语言否定是一种既普遍又重要的语言学现象,也就是说它几乎存在于所有的语言中。本文认为元语言否定是对语言表达不恰当之处的否定,主要包括:荷恩等级,内涵,预设,语言手段以及观点立场方面的否定,而描述性否定是对语言表达语义层面上的否定。“元语言否定”及其相对应的“描述性否定”最早是由Ducrot提出的。一直以来,不同理论背景的学者们均对这一语言现象抱有浓厚的研究兴趣。尤其是元语言否定的语义和语用推理等话题在过去近30年中有比较深入的研究,这些研究对我们系统认识和深刻理解元语言否定现象奠定了坚实的基础。但是,现有的研究成果还难以勾勒出一个元语言否定生成与理解的机制解释框架。本文在“框架理论”的基础上,从“认知语境”的角度用“概念整合理论”对元语言否定在线理解的内在机制做出认知阐释。本文的研究问题主要包括:第一,元语言否定的本质是什么?第二,如何对元语言否定的在线理解机制做出一个系统的认知阐述?对于元语言的本质研究,我们发现元语言否定的前后两部分存在一种看似矛盾实则连贯一致的关系,其目的是为了否定两个框架之间的特性差异而凸显其中一个框架的特性。根据框架理论,框架是一种与特定情境相联系的认知模型。说话人会把概念和特定的语境相互联系起来,所以框架的理解必须放在语境中才能进行。基于此,本文认为元语言否定,从本质上说是由个人的角度,注意程度,个人经验等因素的差异所造成的框架之间的对立与冲突,也就是对不同词汇的“突出特征”的背离。从更深层次上说,元语言否定是对框架背后的语境的否定。元语言否定是基于两个框架之间的相同点和联系之上的否定,所以元语言否定是两个框架之间的部分否定而描述性否定大都是框架内的完全否定。对于元语言否定的在线理解,本文认为这是一个由不同认知语境所导致的不同概念框架之间的相互作用、相互整合,从而产生新的意义的概念整合过程,该过程一方面消除原有认知框架中的既存前设,同时,我们可以借助话语中的突显特征建立新的认知语境,在此基础上生成新的意义。因此,运用概念整合理论,我们可以对元语言否定的在线理解机制提供一个更加动态和清晰的解读框架。
[Abstract]:Metalinguistic negation is a common and important linguistic phenomenon, that is to say, it exists in almost all languages. This paper holds that metalinguistic negation is a negation of the inappropriateness of linguistic expression, which mainly includes the negation of Horne grade, connotation, presupposition, linguistic means and viewpoint, while descriptive negation is negative on the semantic level of linguistic expression. Metalinguistic negation and its corresponding descriptive negation were first proposed by Ducrot. For a long time, scholars from different theoretical backgrounds have a strong interest in this language phenomenon. In particular, the semantic and pragmatic reasoning of metalinguistic negation has been deeply studied in the past 30 years. These studies have laid a solid foundation for our systematic understanding and profound understanding of the phenomenon of metalinguistic negation. However, the existing research results are difficult to outline a framework for explaining the mechanism of meta-language negative generation and understanding. On the basis of "frame theory", this paper uses "conceptual integration theory" to make a cognitive explanation of the internal mechanism of meta-language negative online understanding from the perspective of "cognitive context". The main research questions of this paper are as follows: first, what is the essence of metalinguistic negation? Second, how to make a systematic cognitive exposition of the online understanding mechanism of meta-language negation? For the study of the essence of metalanguage, we find that there is a seemingly contradictory but coherent relationship between the two parts of metalanguage negation, the purpose of which is to highlight the characteristics of one of the two frameworks in order to negate the difference between the two frameworks. According to the framework theory, the framework is a cognitive model related to a specific situation. The speaker will connect the concept with the specific context, so the understanding of the framework must be put in the context before it can be carried out. Based on this, this paper holds that metalinguistic negation is essentially the opposition and conflict between frameworks caused by the differences of personal point of view, attention degree, personal experience and so on, that is, the deviation from the "outstanding characteristics" of different words. On a deeper level, metalinguistic negation is the negation of the context behind the framework. Metalinguistic negation is based on the similarities and connections between the two frameworks, so metalinguistic negation is a partial negation between the two frameworks, while descriptive negation is mostly complete negation within the framework. For the online understanding of meta-language negation, this paper holds that this is a process of conceptual integration caused by different cognitive contexts, which leads to the interaction and integration of different conceptual frameworks, which on the one hand eliminates the existing prepositions in the original cognitive framework, and at the same time, we can establish a new cognitive context with the help of the salient features in the discourse, on the basis of which we can generate new meanings. Therefore, by using the theory of conceptual integration, we can provide a more dynamic and clear interpretation framework for the online understanding mechanism of meta-language negation.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H030
[Abstract]:Metalinguistic negation is a common and important linguistic phenomenon, that is to say, it exists in almost all languages. This paper holds that metalinguistic negation is a negation of the inappropriateness of linguistic expression, which mainly includes the negation of Horne grade, connotation, presupposition, linguistic means and viewpoint, while descriptive negation is negative on the semantic level of linguistic expression. Metalinguistic negation and its corresponding descriptive negation were first proposed by Ducrot. For a long time, scholars from different theoretical backgrounds have a strong interest in this language phenomenon. In particular, the semantic and pragmatic reasoning of metalinguistic negation has been deeply studied in the past 30 years. These studies have laid a solid foundation for our systematic understanding and profound understanding of the phenomenon of metalinguistic negation. However, the existing research results are difficult to outline a framework for explaining the mechanism of meta-language negative generation and understanding. On the basis of "frame theory", this paper uses "conceptual integration theory" to make a cognitive explanation of the internal mechanism of meta-language negative online understanding from the perspective of "cognitive context". The main research questions of this paper are as follows: first, what is the essence of metalinguistic negation? Second, how to make a systematic cognitive exposition of the online understanding mechanism of meta-language negation? For the study of the essence of metalanguage, we find that there is a seemingly contradictory but coherent relationship between the two parts of metalanguage negation, the purpose of which is to highlight the characteristics of one of the two frameworks in order to negate the difference between the two frameworks. According to the framework theory, the framework is a cognitive model related to a specific situation. The speaker will connect the concept with the specific context, so the understanding of the framework must be put in the context before it can be carried out. Based on this, this paper holds that metalinguistic negation is essentially the opposition and conflict between frameworks caused by the differences of personal point of view, attention degree, personal experience and so on, that is, the deviation from the "outstanding characteristics" of different words. On a deeper level, metalinguistic negation is the negation of the context behind the framework. Metalinguistic negation is based on the similarities and connections between the two frameworks, so metalinguistic negation is a partial negation between the two frameworks, while descriptive negation is mostly complete negation within the framework. For the online understanding of meta-language negation, this paper holds that this is a process of conceptual integration caused by different cognitive contexts, which leads to the interaction and integration of different conceptual frameworks, which on the one hand eliminates the existing prepositions in the original cognitive framework, and at the same time, we can establish a new cognitive context with the help of the salient features in the discourse, on the basis of which we can generate new meanings. Therefore, by using the theory of conceptual integration, we can provide a more dynamic and clear interpretation framework for the online understanding mechanism of meta-language negation.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H030
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许超;;从合作—关联—顺应模式看语用否定及其语用效果[J];工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报);2012年03期
2 赵e，
本文编号：2506130
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2506130.html
