《我的安东妮亚》英汉文本的及物性过程对比研究

发布时间：2017-09-26 21:26

  本文关键词：《我的安东妮亚》英汉文本的及物性过程对比研究

  更多相关文章： 《我的安东妮亚》 及物性过程 比较 对比

【摘要】：本文分别抽取《我的安东妮亚》中四个相对应的英汉文本进行对比分析,旨在探讨英汉两种语言在及物性过程方面的异同。具体来说,本研究试图解决三个研究问题：(1)《我的安东妮亚》的英汉文本分别包含哪些及物性过程?(2)英汉及物性过程的分布有何异同?(3)造成这些异同的因素是什么?本文以韩礼德系统功能语法的及物性为理论基础,采取定量分析与定性分析相结合的方式对样本进行了分析。定量分析主要是呈现各个及物性过程在样本中的分布情况,定性分析不仅用于分析英汉间的过程转换,表现及物性在揭示主人公安东妮亚性格特征的适用性,也用于揭示英汉及物性过程的异同。通过中英及物性过程的比较和对比,本研究获得六个发现。相同点：(1)汉语中六个及物性过程的分布大体上与其英语原文保持一致；(2)在小句主语不明确或者不清楚的情况下,英语和汉语的及物性过程均采用被动语态。不同点：(1)英语的关系过程与汉语的关系过程在关系连接动词的组成成分方面存在差异；(2)英语多用被动语态,汉语多用主动语态。汉语通过在物质过程动词前添加“把”“让”将英语被动语态的物质过程转换为主动语态；(3)英语的关系过程转换为汉语的物质过程主要是由于静态词转换为动态词造成的；(4)在应对英语系表结构“get+adjective"的及物性过程时,汉语通常会增加或删减其中的过程类型。造成“get+adjective"结构的及物性过程发生过程转换的原因主要是忽略了翻译“get”这个动词的意思并增译了一个新的动词,同时,"get+adjective"结构中形容词意思的不具体性是造成过程转换的另一原因。英汉及物性的异同主要归结于小说的主题和体裁与及连接词在中英文本中的使用情况。小说的主题及体裁影响及物性过程的分布,连接词在中英文小句构建中的不同作用是造成及物性过程转换的主要原因。
【关键词】：《我的安东妮亚》 及物性过程 比较 对比
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H146;H314
【目录】：

• 中文摘要3-4
• Abstract4-10
• Chapter 1 Introduction10-13
• 1.1 Introduction of Willa Cather and My Antonia10
• 1.2 Research questions of this study10-11
• 1.3 Research method of this study11
• 1.4 Significance of this study11-12
• 1.5 Organization of this study12-13
• Chapter 2 Literature Review13-22
• 2.1 Previous analysis on My Antonia13-14
• 2.2 Previous studies of transitivity in discourse analysis14-19
• 2.2.1 Previous studies of transitivity abroad14-16
• 2.2.2 Previous studies of transitivity at home16-19
• 2.3 Previous studies of English-Chinese(E-C)translation from the perspective of transitivity19-22
• Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework22-32
• 3.1 Definition of transitivity22
• 3.2 Types of processes in transitivity22-28
• 3.3 Other concepts in transitivity process28-30
• 3.3.1 Beneficiary,Range in transitivity process28-29
• 3.3.2 Circumstantial elements29-30
• 3.4 Phenomenon of process transfer30-32
• Chapter 4 Methodology32-40
• 4.1 Source of data32
• 4.2 Data collection32-38
• 4.2.1 Sample texts in My Antonia32-34
• 4.2.1.1 Classifications of My Antonia32-33
• 4.2.1.2 Criteria of the classifications of My Antonia33
• 4.2.1.3 Criteria of the selection of sample texts33-34
• 4.2.2 Transitivity in the sample texts34-37
• 4.2.2.1 Classifications of transitivity process34-36
• 4.2.2.2 Criteria of the classifications of transitivity process36
• 4.2.2.3 Methods of the classifications of transitivity process36-37
• 4.2.3 Procedures of data collection37-38
• 4.3 Data analysis38-40
• Chapter 5 Results and Discussions40-73
• 5.1 Contrastive analysis of part one40-47
• 5.1.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text40-43
• 5.1.2 Transitivity analysis of the target text43-44
• 5.1.3 Comparison between the source text and target text44-47
• 5.2 Contrastive analysis of part two47-56
• 5.2.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text47-49
• 5.2.2 Transitivity analysis of the target text49-50
• 5.2.3 Comparison between the source text and target text50-56
• 5.2.3.1 Verbs in material processes50-53
• 5.2.3.2 Passive voice in mental processes53-54
• 5.2.3.3 Mutual process transfer between material and relational processes54-55
• 5.2.3.4 Static-Dynamic conversion in mental processes55-56
• 5.3 Contrastive analysis of part three56-63
• 5.3.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text56-58
• 5.3.2 Transitivity analysis of the target text58-59
• 5.3.3 Comparison between the source text and target text59-63
• 5.3.3.1 Variation of relational process verbs in relational processes60-61
• 5.3.3.2 Conversion from relational processes to mental processes61-62
• 5.3.3.3 Intensive in relational processes62
• 5.3.3.4 Conversion from passive material process to existential process62-63
• 5.4 Contrastive analysis of part four63-69
• 5.4.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text63-64
• 5.4.2 Relational processes concerning Antonia of the source text64-65
• 5.4.3 Transitivity analysis of the target text65-66
• 5.4.4 Comparison between the source text and target text66-69
• 5.4.4.1 Conversion from material processes to material processes66-68
• 5.4.4.2 Process transfer caused by the English structure "get+adj"68-69
• 5.5 Summary of transitivity in the two versions69-73
• Chapter 6 Conclusions73-79
• 6.1 Major findings73-76
• 6.1.1 Similarities of transitivity in English and Chinese73-74
• 6.1.2 Differences of transitivity in English and Chinese74-75
• 6.1.3 Reasons for the similarities and differences75-76
• 6.2 Implications of this study76-77
• 6.3 Limitations of this study77
• 6.4 Suggestions for future studies77-79
• Appendix79-87
• References87-91
• Acknowledgements91-92

【相似文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 靳俊杰;;《义勇军进行曲》及其英译本的及物性分析[J];科技信息;2011年36期

2 潘章仙;及物性分析在描写文体特征时的表现力[J];山东外语教学;2003年04期

3 戴U，

本文编号：925815