被误读的报人汪康年:从新闻学研究和历史学研究的比较谈起
发布时间：2018-11-18 14:55
【摘要】：文章对比了史学和新闻学对汪康年的研究,认为汪康年是一位被新闻史误读的报人。史学研究认为,汪康年是一名维新派人士,汪梁之争是学术之争、管理权之争,汪康年是张之洞的代理人的说法不正确;新闻史研究认为,汪康年是洋务派人士,汪梁之争是维新派和洋务派之争,汪康年是张之洞的代理人。文章重点探讨了汪康年被误读的的深层次原因:即研究范式、方法论、具体研究方法、治学态度等因素共同导致了汪康年的被误读。学科的差异性和评价主体的差异性并不能成为误读汪康年的借口,新闻史研究要遵守史学研究的规范,运用史学研究的方法,评价尽可能地做到客观、公正。
[Abstract]:This paper compares the studies of Wang Kangnian by historiography and journalism, and concludes that Wang Kangnian is a newspaper man who has been misread by the history of journalism. According to the historical studies, Wang Kangnian is a reformist, Wang Liang's argument is academic and management power's, and Wang Kangnian's agent is not correct. The study of news history holds that Wang Kangnian is a Westernist, Wang Liang's contention is a struggle between the Reformists and the Westernists, and Wang Kangnian is an agent of Zhang Zhidong. This paper focuses on the deep causes of Wang Kangnian's misreading: the research paradigm, methodology, specific research methods, academic attitude and other factors lead to the misreading of Wang Kangnian. The difference of subject and evaluation subject can not be used as an excuse to misread Wang Kangnian. The study of news history should abide by the norms of historical research and use the method of historical research to evaluate as objectively and impartially as possible.
【作者单位】： 西藏民族大学新闻传播学院;
【分类号】：G219.29
，
本文编号：2340351
[Abstract]:This paper compares the studies of Wang Kangnian by historiography and journalism, and concludes that Wang Kangnian is a newspaper man who has been misread by the history of journalism. According to the historical studies, Wang Kangnian is a reformist, Wang Liang's argument is academic and management power's, and Wang Kangnian's agent is not correct. The study of news history holds that Wang Kangnian is a Westernist, Wang Liang's contention is a struggle between the Reformists and the Westernists, and Wang Kangnian is an agent of Zhang Zhidong. This paper focuses on the deep causes of Wang Kangnian's misreading: the research paradigm, methodology, specific research methods, academic attitude and other factors lead to the misreading of Wang Kangnian. The difference of subject and evaluation subject can not be used as an excuse to misread Wang Kangnian. The study of news history should abide by the norms of historical research and use the method of historical research to evaluate as objectively and impartially as possible.
【作者单位】： 西藏民族大学新闻传播学院;
【分类号】：G219.29
，
本文编号：2340351
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xinwenchuanbolunwen/2340351.html
