健康人心理性衰老量表的构建

发布时间：2018-01-10 07:00

本文关键词：健康人心理性衰老量表的构建　出处：《中南大学学报(医学版)》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:构建健康人心理性衰老量表,为科学评价衰老提供测量工具和参考指标。方法:通过文献搜集、专家意见征询筛选心理性衰老条目,经2轮德尔菲(Delphi)法对各指标重要性、可行性及权威程度进行评分,用层次分析法对心理性衰老各维度和条目进行权重分配,采用内部一致性信度分析、相关性分析、探索性因子分析等评价量表的信度和效度。结果:共有17名专家完成2轮咨询,专家权威程度评分为0.88±0.06,第二轮各指标重要性、可行性协调系数分别为0.456(P0.01)和0.666(P0.01),一致性尚好,最终确定心理性衰老指标有认知功能、情绪、人格、动机与需要共4维度18个条目,各维度权重系数分别为0.338,0.250,0.166和0.258。量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.822,重测信度为0.817,内容效度指数为0.847,5个公因子的累计贡献率为51.42%。结论:本研究建立的心理性衰老量表较理想,指标代表性好、认可度较高,量表的内容、结构效度较好,可为评价衰老提供参考。
[Abstract]:Objective: to construct a mental senescence scale for healthy people and to provide a measuring tool and a reference index for the scientific evaluation of senescence. Methods: through literature collection, experts' opinions were consulted to screen items of psychological senility. After two rounds of Delphi Delphi method to evaluate the importance, feasibility and authority of each index, AHP was used to distribute the weight of each dimension and item of psychological senescence. Internal consistency reliability analysis, correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: a total of 17 experts completed two rounds of consultation. The expert degree of authority score was 0.88 卤0.06, the importance of each index in the second round, the feasibility coordination coefficient was 0.456P0.01and 0.666 P0.01respectively). There are 18 items in 4 dimensions including cognitive function, emotion, personality, motivation and need. The weight coefficient of each dimension is 0.3380.250. The Cronbach's 伪 coefficient, retest reliability and content validity index were 0.822, 0.817 and 0.847 respectively. The cumulative contribution rate of the five common factors is 51.42. Conclusion: the psychological senescence scale established in this study is ideal, the index is representative, the recognition degree is high, the content and the structure validity of the scale are better. It can provide reference for the evaluation of aging.
【作者单位】：南昌大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(81360446) 江西省自然科学基金(20132BAB205074)~~
【分类号】：R339.38
【正文快照】： Construction of a psychological aging scale for healthy peopleLIN Fei,LONG Yao,ZENG Ni,WU Lei,HUANG Helang(Department of Epidemiology,School of Public Health,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,China).Methods:The age-related psychological items were coll

【相似文献】