中国出生缺陷三级干预综合评价指标体系的构建

发布时间：2018-03-17 05:15

本文选题：出生缺陷　切入点：德尔菲法　出处：《重庆医科大学学报》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:制定出生缺陷三级干预综合评价指标体系及确定各指标权重,为出生缺陷干预工作的开展及其干预效果评价提供科学依据。方法:采用文献研究法和德尔菲专家咨询法,通过两轮问卷咨询,建立出生缺陷三级干预综合评价指标体系,运用层次分析法确定各指标权重,最后进行一致性检验。结果:两轮专家积极系数分别为94.3%、90.9%,专家平均权威系数为0.86,最终构建了出生缺陷三级干预综合评价体系的基本框架,包括3个一级指标:项目组织管理,项目过程评价,项目干预评价,9个二级指标和31个三级指标,并确定了各指标的权重。结论:专家代表性好、权威性高,构建的指标体系具有科学性和合理性,可用于出生缺陷三级干预项目的综合评价。
[Abstract]:Objective: to establish a comprehensive evaluation index system of three levels of birth defect intervention and determine the weight of each index so as to provide a scientific basis for the development of birth defect intervention and the evaluation of its effect. Methods: literature research method and Delphi expert consultation method were used. Through two rounds of questionnaire consultation, the comprehensive evaluation index system of birth defect three-level intervention was established, and the weight of each index was determined by AHP. Results: the positive coefficient of experts in two rounds was 94.30.The average authority coefficient of experts was 0.86. Finally, the basic framework of comprehensive evaluation system of three-level intervention for birth defects was constructed, including three first-level indexes: project organization and management. Project process evaluation, project intervention evaluation, 9 secondary indexes and 31 third grade indexes, and the weight of each index are determined. Conclusion: the expert is representative and authoritative, and the index system is scientific and reasonable. It can be used in the comprehensive evaluation of three-level intervention projects for birth defects.
【作者单位】：重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院医学与社会发展研究中心健康领域社会风险预测治理协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家卫生计生委资助项目
【分类号】：R174

【相似文献】