Treg与Th17在胆道闭锁儿童肝移植患者外周血中的表达及意义
本文选题:儿童肝移植 + 排斥反应 ; 参考:《天津医科大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:研究目的:研究胆道闭锁儿童肝移植患者外周血中CD4+CD25+Foxp3+调节性T细胞(Regulatory T cells,Treg)与辅助性T细胞17(T helper cell 17,Th17)的表达,分析其临床意义。研究方法:纳入自2016年6月至2017年4月期间于天津市第一中心医院小儿肝脏移植科就诊的肝移植手术后随访患儿以及初次接受肝移植手术的患儿42例,原发病均为胆道闭锁。其中初次接受肝移植手术治疗的患儿12例作为肝移植手术观察组,分别于肝移植术前、术后2周及术后1月留取外周静脉血样。肝移植术后超过1年,临床状态稳定的肝移植术后患儿19例作为肝移植长期存活组;根据免疫抑制剂他克莫司(Tacrolimus,FK506)血药浓度不同,分为低浓度组(FK5064.0ng/ml)和高浓度组(FK506≥4.0ng/ml)。肝移植术后发生排斥反应的患儿11例作为肝移植排斥组,并分别在抗排斥治疗前后留取外周静脉血样。另外纳入健康儿童10例作为健康对照组。将静脉血样标记相应荧光结合抗体后,应用流式细胞仪检测Treg细胞与Th17细胞以及细胞毒性T细胞(Cytotoxic T cell,CTL)的表达情况。分别比较各组Treg细胞和Th17细胞比例的变化情况,分析其意义。研究结果:肝移植手术观察组中,肝移植术前及术后不同时间点Treg细胞比例均低于健康组(P0.05)。术前Treg细胞比例高于术后2周(P=0.000)及术后1月(P=0.000),而术后2周与术后1月Treg细胞比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.475)。肝移植术后各时间点Th17细胞比例均高于健康组(P0.05)。手术前后不同时间点的Th17细胞比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.119)。肝移植长期存活组中,可见肝移植长期存活组患儿Treg细胞比例低于健康儿童(P=0.021)。而肝移植术后1年患儿与肝移植术后2年患儿之间Treg细胞比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.077)。肝移植术后长期存活组患儿Th17细胞比例高于健康组(P=0.008)。儿童肝移植术后2年患儿Th17细胞比例低于术后1年患者(P=0.028)。FK506高浓度组和低浓度组Treg细胞比例均低于健康组,(P0.05)。而FK506高浓度组与低浓度组相比,Treg细胞比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.876)。Treg细胞比例与FK506浓度无直线相关关系(P=0.611)。FK506高浓度组和低浓度组Th17细胞比例均高于健康组(P0.05)。而FK506高浓度组与低浓度组相比,Th17细胞比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.396)。Th17细胞比例与FK506浓度无直线相关关系(P=0.729)。在肝移植排斥组中,抗排斥治疗前肝移植患儿Treg细胞比例低于健康组(P=0.000)及肝移植稳定组(P=0.000)。而抗排斥治疗后肝移植患儿Treg细胞比例低于抗排斥治疗前(P=0.001)。肝移植排斥组患儿抗排斥治疗前Th17细胞比例高于健康组(P=0.000)及肝移植稳定组(P=0.000)。抗排斥治疗后Th17细胞比例低于抗排斥治疗前(P=0.000)。肝移植稳定组患儿CTL细胞比例高于健康组(P=0.015)。肝移植排斥组患儿抗排斥治疗前CTL细胞比例高于健康组(P=0.000)及肝移植稳定组(P=0.000)。抗排斥治疗后CTL细胞比例低于抗排斥治疗前(P=0.001)。研究结论:(1)胆道闭锁肝移植患儿术前及术后早期Treg细胞比例均低于健康儿童。Treg细胞比例在术后早期(术后1月)呈下降趋势。术后早期Th17细胞比例均高于健康组,变化不明显。(2)FK506对Treg细胞比例具有较强抑制作用,而对Th17细胞比例抑制作用较弱。FK506对Treg细胞比例及Th17细胞比例的影响与FK506浓度无关。(3)胆道闭锁而肝移植术后发生排斥反应时,外周血Treg细胞比例下降,而Th17细胞比例升高。
[Abstract]:Objective: To study the expression of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Regulatory T cells, Treg) and auxiliary T cell 17 (T helper cell 17, Th17) in peripheral blood of children with biliary atresia, and to analyze its clinical significance. The study methods were included from June 2016 to April 2017 in the pediatric liver transplantation in Tianjin First Central Hospital 42 children were followed up after liver transplantation as well as 42 children who received liver transplantation for the first time. The primary disease was biliary atresia. 12 of the first patients received liver transplantation as the observation group of liver transplantation, before the liver transplantation, 2 weeks after the operation and in January after the operation. More than 1 after liver transplantation. 19 children with stable liver transplantation were used as long-term survival group after liver transplantation. According to the different concentrations of Tacrolimus (FK506), they were divided into low concentration group (FK5064.0ng/ml) and high concentration group (FK506 > 4.0ng/ml). After liver transplantation, 11 cases of rejection in the liver transplant rejection group were divided into the liver transplantation rejection group. In addition to 10 healthy children as a healthy control group, 10 healthy children were taken as a healthy control group. The expression of Treg cells and Th17 cells and cytotoxic T cells (Cytotoxic T cell, CTL) were detected by flow cytometry. Treg cells and Th1 in each group were compared. The change of the proportion of 7 cells was analyzed. The results were as follows: the proportion of Treg cells before and after liver transplantation was lower than that in the healthy group (P0.05). The proportion of Treg cells before the operation was higher than that of 2 weeks after the operation (P=0.000) and after the operation in January (P=0.000), but there was no difference between the 2 weeks after the operation and the proportion of Treg cells in the postoperative period after the operation. Significance (P=0.475). The proportion of Th17 cells at all time points after liver transplantation was higher than that of the healthy group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of Th17 cells at different time points before and after the operation (P=0.119). In the long-term survival group of liver transplantation, the proportion of Treg cells in the long-term survival group of liver transplantation was lower than that of healthy children (P=0.021). And 1 years after liver transplantation There was no significant difference in the proportion of Treg cells between children and children after 2 years of liver transplantation (P=0.077). The proportion of Th17 cells in the long-term survival group after liver transplantation was higher than that of the healthy group (P=0.008). The proportion of Th17 cells in children 2 years after liver transplantation was lower than that of the 1 years after the operation (P=0.028), the proportion of Treg cells in the high concentration group and the low concentration group was low. In the healthy group, (P0.05), the proportion of Treg cells in the high concentration group of FK506 was not statistically significant (P=0.876) and there was no linear correlation between the proportion of.Treg cells and the concentration of FK506 (P=0.611), the proportion of Th17 cells in the high concentration group and the low concentration group were higher than that in the healthy group (P0.05). The FK506 high concentration group was smaller than the low concentration group, and the Th17 thin was fine. There was no significant difference in the proportion of cell ratio (P=0.396).Th17 cell ratio and FK506 concentration (P=0.729). In the liver transplant rejection group, the proportion of Treg cells in the children with liver transplantation before the rejection treatment was lower than that of the healthy group (P=0.000) and the liver transplantation stable group (P=0.000). The proportion of Treg cells in the children with liver transplantation after the anti rejection treatment was lower than that of the anti rejection group. Before treatment (P=0.001). The proportion of Th17 cells before the treatment of rejection in the liver transplantation rejection group was higher than that in the healthy group (P=0.000) and the liver transplantation stable group (P=0.000). The proportion of Th17 cells after anti rejection treatment was lower than before the anti rejection treatment (P=0.000). The CTL cell ratio of the children with the liver transplantation stability group was higher than that of the healthy group (P=0.015). The anti rejection group of the liver transplantation rejection group was resistant to rejection. The proportion of CTL cells before the treatment was higher than that in the healthy group (P=0.000) and the stable liver transplantation group (P=0.000). The proportion of CTL cells after anti rejection treatment was lower than before the anti rejection treatment (P=0.001). (1) the proportion of Treg cells before and after the biliary atresia transplantation was lower than the proportion of.Treg cells in healthy children before and after the operation (January after the operation). The proportion of Th17 cells in early postoperative period was higher than that in the healthy group. (2) FK506 had a strong inhibitory effect on the proportion of Treg cells, while the effect of.FK506 on the proportion of Treg cells and the ratio of Th17 cells to the proportion of Treg cells was not related to the concentration of FK506. (3) the biliary atresia and the rejection of the liver transplantation after the liver transplantation. The proportion of Treg cells in peripheral blood decreased, while the proportion of Th17 cells increased.
【学位授予单位】:天津医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R726.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄洁夫;我国肝移植的现状与展望[J];中华器官移植杂志;2000年02期
2 陈刚,叶启发,刘慎微,刘敦贵,陈实,夏穗生;肝移植术后早期并发成人呼吸窘迫综合征的原因及其防治[J];中华器官移植杂志;2000年02期
3 杨甲梅;肝移植现况[J];肝胆外科杂志;2000年05期
4 何晓顺,黄洁夫;肝移植的现状及若干进展[J];肝胆外科杂志;2000年06期
5 夏穗生;论我国肝移植的健康发展[J];中华肝胆外科杂志;2000年04期
6 钱叶本,陈规划,何晓顺,朱晓峰,陆敏强,蔡常洁,王国栋,杨扬,黄洁夫;肝移植治疗暴发性肝衰肝性脑病的临床研究[J];中华肝胆外科杂志;2000年04期
7 崔东旭,戴显伟,余云;原发性胆汁性肝硬变的肝移植治疗现状[J];中国实用外科杂志;2001年10期
8 丁义涛;结合国情,努力提高我国肝移植的水平[J];中华器官移植杂志;2001年03期
9 彭淑牖;积极稳妥地提高我国肝移植外科的水平[J];中华医学杂志;2001年18期
10 黄广建;体内分裂肝移植的生存预测因素[J];国外医学.外科学分册;2001年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 江艺;杨芳;吕立志;陈少华;胡还章;;肝移植术后重症肺炎的防治体会(附62例报道)[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年
2 郑树森;;攻坚破难,开创肝移植新局面[A];2005年浙江省器官移植学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
3 郑树森;;肝移植中的内科问题[A];中华医学会第十二次全国病毒性肝炎及肝病学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
4 王中林;王晓红;郑珊;;儿童肝移植8例术后长期随访[A];2006(第三届)江浙沪儿科学术会议暨浙江省儿科学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年
5 沈中阳;;中国肝移植十年:成就、挑战与未来[A];第一届全国疑难重型肝病大会、第四届全国人工肝及血液净化学术年会论文集[C];2008年
6 闻大翔;李兴;杭燕南;;肝移植术后认知功能障碍的研究进展[A];2008年中华医学会全国麻醉学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
7 闻大翔;李兴;杭燕南;;肝移植术后认知功能障碍的研究进展[A];2008年第七次华东六省一市麻醉学学术会议暨浙江省麻醉学术年会论文汇编(上册)[C];2008年
8 张闻辉;邓永林;郑虹;朱志军;潘澄;沈中阳;;肝移植术后新发乙型肝炎病毒感染的临床分析[A];2012中国器官移植大会论文汇编[C];2012年
9 傅斌生;李敏如;张彤;朱曙光;李华;易述红;汪根树;张剑;姜楠;许赤;汪国营;赵辉;陈颖华;安玉玲;易慧敏;杨扬;陆敏强;陈规划;;单中心肝移植术后长期生存患者的随访[A];2012中国器官移植大会论文汇编[C];2012年
10 汪国营;杨扬;李华;张剑;汪根树;易述红;许赤;陈规划;;肝移植术后新发急性早幼粒细胞白血病的诊断和治疗[A];2013中国器官移植大会论文汇编[C];2013年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈明莲;肝移植术后防复发[N];健康报;2007年
2 黄祺;夏强:肝移植学科的少帅[N];市场报;2006年
3 记者 戴丽昕;肝移植 正常人最多可捐肝60%[N];上海科技报;2007年
4 本报记者 闫良生;我省肝移植跻身国内先进行列[N];河南日报;2009年
5 张建国 黄显斌 姜玮;解放军第302医院成立“肝移植之家”[N];中国医药报;2009年
6 北京大学器官移植研究所所长 朱继业 刘洋 整理;肝移植后 有些指标要特别关注[N];健康报;2013年
7 杨丽佳 姜跃进;肝移植不能太滥[N];健康报;2005年
8 本报记者叶依本报实习记者 刘晨;肝移植:一环也不能少[N];健康时报;2003年
9 黄显斌;少输血提高肝移植成功率[N];大众卫生报;2007年
10 朱方 廖志林;不言放弃的肝移植专家[N];健康报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 廖晖;双mTORC1/2抑制剂AZD2014在肝细胞癌中的抗癌作用及其在大鼠肝移植中的抗排斥作用[D];南方医科大学;2015年
2 曲伟;肝癌切除术后补救性肝移植的临床研究及监测肝移植人群CD4+Tcell-iATP水平意义的临床研究[D];天津医科大学;2015年
3 张志斌;常温机械灌注对猪劈离式肝移植保护作用的实验研究[D];天津医科大学;2015年
4 曾志贵;儿童死亡后器官捐献及供肝应用的临床研究[D];天津医科大学;2015年
5 赵蔚;肝移植术后ALI/ARDS临床危险因素分析及防治措施研究[D];山东大学;2015年
6 程悦;肝移植术后一个月脑功能改变的静息态功能磁共振成像研究[D];天津医科大学;2016年
7 贾俊君;肝移植供肝保护策略优化及前临床研究[D];浙江大学;2016年
8 刘源;肝移植在儿童单基因遗传病中的疗效分析[D];上海交通大学;2015年
9 滕飞;HCC肝移植长期生存预测模型的建立和优化[D];第二军医大学;2016年
10 李林;1.肝移植术后巨细胞病毒感染的研究 2.肝移植术后一年多因素回顾性分析[D];中国协和医科大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘凯;Treg与Th17在胆道闭锁儿童肝移植患者外周血中的表达及意义[D];天津医科大学;2017年
2 周林;调节性T细胞与肝癌肝移植术后免疫调节、抗肿瘤免疫相关性研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2015年
3 薛国友;两种药物供肝灌注保存对大鼠DCD肝移植的影响[D];昆明医科大学;2015年
4 陈楠;肝移植术后急性肾损伤的流行病学研究[D];复旦大学;2013年
5 张鲁洲;肝癌肝移植患者鉴定肿瘤克隆起源的临床及病理意义的探讨[D];天津医科大学;2015年
6 章琦;肝移植术后早期急性肾损伤危险因素及诊断分析[D];南昌大学医学院;2015年
7 杨天池;Clavien-Dindo分级在分析肝功能衰竭肝移植术后并发症相关因素中的应用[D];首都医科大学;2016年
8 张静;新疆肝移植手术患者生存质量的调研与影响因素探讨[D];新疆医科大学;2015年
9 赵正伟;DCD肝移植供体评分对术后早期预后影响[D];吉林大学;2016年
10 王起龙;DCD肝移植供肝灌洗液淋巴细胞亚群的初步提取与分析[D];吉林大学;2016年
,本文编号:2036786
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/eklw/2036786.html