婴幼儿腹横肌平面阻滞的相关临床研究
[Abstract]:Transversus abdominal dominis plane block (TAPB) is a regional analgesia technique for abdominal anesthesia. It can provide effective analgesia for anterior abdominal skin, muscle and peritoneal wall through nerve block in the plane lacuna of transverse abdominal muscle. In this study, TAPB in infants and young children was studied by ultrasound imaging, effective dosage of drugs, puncture approach and so on. Part one: Comparison of analgesic effect and drug expansion in infants and young children with different volume of 1% lidocaine TAP. Objective: To compare the analgesic effect and drug diffusion of 1% lidocaine in transverse abdominal plane block in infants and young children.Methods: 60 infants, 40 males and 20 females, who were selected to undergo selective unilateral indirect inguinal hernia or hydrocele surgery according to the selected criteria, were selected. All the patients were induced by sevoflurane inhalation. After successful TAP puncture by transaxillary midline under ultrasound guidance, the children in L_ (0.3) group were injected with 1% lidocaine 0.3 ml/kg, the children in L_ (0.5) group were injected with 1% lidocaine 0.5 ml/kg, the children in C group were injected with 0.3 ml/kg or 0.5 ml/kg saline. After TAP puncture and injection, the onset time and blocking range of lidocaine were measured by acupuncture under midazolam sedation. After induction of sevoflurane anesthesia, laryngeal mask was inserted and 3% sevoflurane was inhaled to maintain anesthesia. Remifentanil was continuously or intermittently infused during operation according to the changes of heart rate and blood pressure. Ultrasound images were used to measure the distance of local anesthetic solution from the middle axillary line to the end of the head and tail of TAP, the distance between the internal oblique and transverse abdominal muscles (I-T) and the distance between the liquid and the lowest costal margin, the iliac spine. Result: (1) The onset time and duration of TAPB in two groups were the same (P 0.05). The level of TAP blockade in L_ (0.5) group was up to T10. The level of TAP blockade in L_ (0.3) group was lower than that in L_ (0.5) group (P 0.01). L_ (0.3) and L_ (0.5) group were lower than that in C group (P 0.01). There was no difference in the amount of remifentanil between L_ (0.3) and L_ (0.5) groups (P 0.05). After TAP injection, the ultrasonic image showed a spindle-shaped or spoon-shaped cavity of TAP solution. After TAP injection, the liquid diffused forward and backward, the diffused distance between head and tail increased, the distance between the liquid and the lower costal margin decreased, but at the end of surgery, the above-mentioned diffused distance of the liquid did not change significantly. Compared with L_ (0.3), the distance between L_ (0.3) and subcostal margin was shorter, and the distance to other directions was wider. When the TAP blockade disappeared, ultrasound images showed that some of the children in both groups still had a small amount of residual TAP fluid in the cavity. The posterior sheath of the internal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominal muscle fascia were significantly thickened and swelled after being infiltrated by the liquid. Conclusion: (1) 0.3ml/kg and 0.5ml/kg of 1% lidocaine can be used to lift the oblique inguinal hernia and hydrocele in infants. To provide reliable TAP blockade effect and reduce the use of opioids during operation. (2) After TAP injection in infants and young children, changes with time, ultrasound imaging shows that drug diffusion characteristics are different: after injection to the drug onset of two-way diffusion, head-tail diffusion is obvious; and at the end of the operation, drug diffusion is stable at the level of drug onset, not clear. The volume of the drug has a significant effect on the diffusion of TAP. When the volume increases, the diffusion distance increases in all directions and the distance from the infracostal margin shortens, which is conducive to increasing the blocking range of the innervating nerve in the lower abdomen. Methods: (1) 100 infants, 75 males and 25 females, were selected to undergo unilateral oblique inguinal hernia surgery or excision of lower inguinal mass. The children were randomly divided into two groups. Twenty children in each group were treated with sevoflurane inhalation, and TAP puncture was performed under the guidance of ultrasound. The concentrations of 0.1%, 0.125%, 0.15%, 0.20% and 0.25% levobupivacaine in different TAP groups were given 0.5 ml/kg. If the body movement reaction occurs, or the heart rate or blood pressure increases by 20% for more than 1 minute, the TAP block is considered ineffective. The general condition of the five groups of children, the effective number of TAPB and the effective nerve block of TAPB were recorded and compared. The EC50, EC95 and 95% confidence intervals of 0.5ml/kg levobupivacaine for infantile TAPB were measured by Probit unit regression method. (2) 100 infants, 77 males and 23 females, were selected for unilateral indirect inguinal hernia or 50 infants for unilateral subumbilical abdominal mass resection. The children were randomly divided into five volume groups: L_ (0.2), L_ (0.25), L_ (0.3), L_ (0.3), L_ (0.3) 5 and L_ (0.4). Each group had 20 cases. The volume of levobupivacaine given by TAPB was 0.2 ml/kg, 0.25 ml/kg, 0.30 ml/kg, 0.35 ml/kg and 0.4 ml/kg, respectively. EV50, EV95 and 95% confidence intervals of 0.25% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided TAP block in infants and young children were measured by Probit unit regression. Results: (1) EC50 of 0.13% (95% confidence interval 0.118% ~ 0.148% for ultrasound-guided TAP block in infants and young children was 0.5 ml/kg levobupivacaine. EC95 was 0.23% (95% confidence interval was 0.20% ~ 0.31%); Probit dose-response relationship equation was: Probit = 5.84 + 6.682X. There were significant differences in postoperative analgesic time between the groups (P 0.01), and there were also differences between the two groups (P 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation (P 0.01) and a linear relationship (P 0.01). The linear equation was: postoperative analgesia time = - 3.316 + 68.03X. (2) EV50 of 0.25% levobupivacaine for TAPB was 0.27 ml, 95% confidence interval was (0.248 ~ 0.284), EC95 was 0.37 ml, 95% confidence interval was (0.339 ~ 0.435), and dose-effect relationship formula was established. There was no significant difference in postoperative analgesic time between the two groups (P 0.01). Conclusion: (1) EC50 and EC95 of 0.5 ml/kg levobupivacaine for TAPB in lower abdomen were 0.13% and 0.23% respectively under ultrasound guidance in infants and young children with effective TAP blockade in each dose group. (2) EV50 and EV95 of 0.25% levobupivacaine were 0.27 ml and 0.37 ml for TAPB in lower abdominal surgery under ultrasound guidance. There was no difference in the postoperative analgesic time between the patients with effective TAP block in each volume group. Objective:To compare the analgesic effects of ropivacaine axillary midline block and posterior TAP block in infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery.Methods:Sixty infants, 44 males and 16 females, were selected and divided into three groups according to the different methods of TAP block. Methane inhalation was induced in group A, axillary midline TAP block under ultrasound guidance was performed in group B, posterior TAP block under ultrasound guidance was performed in group B, and 0.25% ropivacaine 0.4 ml was injected into group C. The control group was given general anesthesia only peripheral venipuncture without TAP block. Ropivacaine onset time and blockade range. After induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane inhalation, the patient was given a laryngeal mask and maintained anesthesia with 3% sevoflurane inhalation. During the operation, the dosage of remifentanil was adjusted according to the changes of heart rate and blood pressure. The duration of laryngeal mask, the duration of stay in PACU, the onset time of TAP block in group A and B, the range of block, the changes of blood pressure and heart rate before and after skin incision were observed, and the total amount of remifentanil was calculated. FLACC score was used to assess the pain at 6 and 24 hours. Operational complications and toxic side effects of local anesthetics were observed during TAP blockade. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting, dizziness and headache, palpitation, respiratory depression and somnolence were recorded 24 hours after operation. There was no significant difference in onset time between the two groups (P 0.05) at 6 65 The total amount of remifentanil used in operation was less than that in general anesthesia control group (P 0.01); during the stay in PACU, the incidence of restlessness and PAED scores in group A and B were lower than those in control group (P 0.05); FLACC scores in group A and B were significantly lower than those in group A, 4, 8 and 12 hours after operation (P 0.05); FLACC scores in group B were significantly lower than those in group A and C at 16 hours after operation (P 0.05). Conclusion: TAP block with 0.25% ropivacaine 0.4ml/kg by midaxillary route and posterior route can provide satisfactory results for infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery. The onset time of TAP block is the same, but the level of TAPB by posterior route is higher and the postoperative analgesia time is longer, both methods can significantly reduce the operation of infants and young children. Conclusion 1.0.3 ml/kg and 0.5 ml/kg of 1% lidocaine can provide reliable TAP blocking effect for infants undergoing indirect inguinal hernia and hydrocele surgery. The EC50 of TAPB was 0.13% and EC95 was 0.23% under ultrasound guidance. 4. EV50 of TAPB was 0.27 ml and E was 0.25% under ultrasound guidance. V95 was 0.37ml.5.The onset time of TAPB was the same in infants and young children treated with 0.25% ropivacaine 0.4ml/kg in axillary midline and posterior route, but the blockade range of TAPB in posterior route was higher and the postoperative analgesia time was longer than that of axillary midline.
【学位授予单位】:天津医科大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R726.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 纪瑞成;;腹横肌下部缺损合并腹股沟斜疝一例[J];山东医科大学学报;1989年01期
2 薛延军,刘海燕,李祥鹏,奚林,韩晓红,段大航;腹横肌修复膈缺损的初步研究[J];中国民政医学杂志;2001年03期
3 王曼;;腹横肌阻滞临床应用进展[J];中国中西医结合外科杂志;2014年03期
4 魏颖;陈小琳;王菁;;超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于小儿阑尾术后镇痛的临床研究[J];福建医药杂志;2013年04期
5 朱常花;王琛;谢红;;超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞镇痛有效性的初步观察[J];苏州大学学报(医学版);2011年03期
6 张学政;王权光;周颖;吴一泉;杨沛;陈丽梅;徐旭仲;;超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞用于改善腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛质量的临床观察[J];北京医学;2013年04期
7 王玉群;;超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛[J];中国实用医药;2013年20期
8 林丽丽;赵延华;王豆豆;;腹横肌平面阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛[J];临床麻醉学杂志;2009年07期
9 卢文江;范丹;兰志勋;;超声引导腹横肌阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术应用的临床观察[J];四川医学;2014年01期
10 郑珈琳;罗世忠;郭昌立;张玲;钟庆;;超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产全麻术后镇痛中的运用[J];四川医学;2014年03期
相关会议论文 前9条
1 徐旭仲;;腹横肌平面阻滞-腹壁区域阻滞新方法[A];2009年浙江省麻醉学学术会议论文汇编[C];2009年
2 万凯;;腹横肌训练对脑瘫患儿躯干控制的疗效分析[A];中华医学会第十七次全国儿科学术大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2012年
3 董宝玮;;医学模式变革与现代超声影像[A];中国超声医学工程学会第八届全国腹部超声学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 张敬东;易先宏;李玉安;孙盛仁;;超声影像在小儿骨折诊断治疗中的价值[A];中华医学会第八次全国小儿外科学术会论文集[C];2010年
5 董宝玮;;医学模式变革与超声影像进展[A];庆祝中国超声诊断50年暨第十届全国超声医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年
6 盛林;;“绿色医疗”指导下的超声影像诊疗模式变革探索[A];中国超声医学工程学会第九届全国腹部超声医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年
7 陈素玲;;医学超声影像设备的新进展与发展趋势[A];中华医学会医学工程学分会第一次医学影像设备应用技术研讨会论文集[C];1999年
8 孙一红;;毒蛇咬伤肢体的超声影像特征[A];2007年浙江省超声医学学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
9 范秀萍;朱强;汪林;马腾;夏春霞;周亚静;;超声影像检测功能性消化不良患者胃容受性的探讨[A];中国超声医学工程学会第九届全国腹部超声医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 本报记者 耿倩;影像人生 定格精彩[N];科学导报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 刘金柱;婴幼儿腹横肌平面阻滞的相关临床研究[D];天津医科大学;2017年
2 黄生辉;超声引导下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞在腹部手术术后镇痛的临床研究[D];兰州大学;2017年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘芮竹;全麻联合腹横肌平面阻滞对胃癌根治术患者围术期应激和免疫影响的研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
2 罗文辉;右美托咪定复合罗,
本文编号:2182694
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/eklw/2182694.html