解剖M型及二维斑点追踪成像技术评价冠脉多支病变患者左室心肌功能
本文关键词: 解剖M型 二维斑点追踪分层应变 左室心肌功能 冠脉多支病变 出处:《大连医科大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:目的:应用解剖M型及二维斑点追踪成像技术评价冠脉多支病变患者左室心肌功能的改变。方法:随机选取38例心脏结构正常及无明显节段性室壁运动异常的冠脉多支病变患者纳入MVD组和40例正常人作为对照组,应用常规二维超声心动图(2DE)采集常规心脏测量切面和左室心尖四腔、两腔和三腔的二维动态图像。应用常规二维超声心动图(2DE)、二维斑点追踪技术(2D-STI)、解剖M型(AMM)对两组左心室相关参数进行测量:1.2DE常规参数测值包括:舒张末期左室内径(LVDd)及室间隔(IVSTd)、左室后壁厚度(IVSTd),收缩末期左房内径(LAESd)及二尖瓣口脉冲多普勒(PW)血流速度E峰、A峰,二尖瓣环左室侧壁组织多普勒(TDI)e峰、a峰,并计算E/A,E/e。利用Simpson法测得左室射血分数(LVEF)。2.2D-STI技术测量左室收缩功能参数包括:(1)应用二维斑点追踪自动功能成像(AFI)分析软件在机分析左室心尖位各切面,快速获取左室心肌各节段收缩期纵向应变值及整体纵向应变值(GLS)。(2)应用二维斑点追踪分层应变功能脱机分析左室心尖位各切面,获取各切面心内膜下、中层、心外膜下心肌纵向应变值及各切面全层心肌整体纵向应变值。各纵向应变值均以绝对值进行分析。3.2D-STI技术及AMM测量左室舒张功能参数包括:(1)应用二维斑点追踪应变分析软件脱机分析左室心尖位各切面,测量左室心肌各节段舒张早期(SrE)及舒张晚期纵向应变率值(SrA),并计算各节段SrE/SrA。(2)分别在胸骨旁左室长轴切面、左室短轴乳头肌水平切面解剖M型运动曲线上测量室间隔、左室后壁、前壁及下壁的室壁运动幅度、收缩期达峰时间、舒张期松弛时间及收缩期达峰时间与舒张期松弛时间比值。结果:1.冠状动脉造影结果:MVD组冠状动脉造影显示侧支血管丰富的病例数目明显增多。2.2DE常规参数比较结果:与对照组比较,MVD组LVDd、IVSTd、LVPWTd、LAESd、E峰、E/A、a峰、LVEF差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),e峰减低、A峰及E/e升高,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。3.2D-STI测量左室收缩功能参数比较结果:(1)与对照组比较,MVD组患者整体GLS降低无统计学意义(P0.05),但是MVD组患者基底段、中间段水平的后间隔及左室下壁纵向应变减低,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。(2)与对照组比较,MVD组左室心尖位各切面心内膜下心肌纵向应变均减低,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),但左室心尖位各切面中层心肌、心外膜下心肌纵向应变及各切面全层心肌整体纵向应变减低均无显著差异(P0.05)。4.2D-STI及AMM测量左室舒张功能参数比较结果:(1)与对照组比较,MVD组患者部分节段SrE/SrA比值减低,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。(2)两组间左室前壁、下壁、后壁、室间隔运动幅度及收缩期达峰时间差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。与对照组比较,MVD组患者舒张期松弛时间延长,收缩期达峰时间与舒张期松弛时间比值减低,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:1.二维斑点追踪分层应变技术可以评价冠脉多支病变患者左室心肌纵向分层应变,为判断冠脉多支病变患者早期左室收缩功能损害提供一种新的评价方法。2.AMM联合2D-STI可以对冠脉多支病变患者左室局部舒张功能进行有效评价,有助于简便、无创地筛选出无症状冠脉多支病变患者。
[Abstract]:Objective: the application of anatomical M mode and two dimensional speckle tracking imaging assessment of coronary multivessel disease in patients with left ventricular function changes. Methods: randomly selected 38 patients with normal heart structure and no obvious coronary segmental wall motion abnormalities in patients with multivessel disease in MVD group and 40 cases of normal people as control group, using conventional two dimensional echocardiography (2DE) acquisition routine measurement of the heart section and the left ventricular apical four chamber, two chamber and three chamber of the two-dimensional dynamic images. The application of conventional two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), two dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI), M (AMM) anatomical measurement of related parameters of the two groups of left ventricle: 1.2DE the conventional parameters measured include: left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVDd) and interventricular septum (IVSTd), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (IVSTd), left atrial end systolic diameter (LAESd) and mitral pulse Doppler (PW) blood flow velocity of E peak, A peak of mitral annulus left ventricular lateral wall tissue Doppler (TDI) e peak, a peak, E/e. and E/A were calculated and measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by Simpson method including the parameter measurement of left ventricular systolic function in.2.2D-STI (1): automated function imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking (AFI) analysis software in machine analysis of left ventricular apical sections, fast get the left ventricular segmental systolic longitudinal strain and global longitudinal strain (GLS). (2) layered strain analysis of left ventricular function offline apical sections by two-dimensional speckle tracking for each section of subendocardial, subepicardial middle, longitudinal strain value and each section of full thickness myocardial global longitudinal strain the longitudinal strain values. Values are in absolute value of.3.2D-STI and AMM to measure the left ventricular diastolic function parameters include: (1) software offline analysis of left ventricular apical sections analysis using two-dimensional speckle tracking strain measurement of left ventricular myocardial segments early diastolic (SrE ) and late diastolic longitudinal strain rate (SrA), and calculate each segment of SrE/SrA. (2) respectively in the parasternal long axis view, left ventricular papillary muscle level in short axis view anatomy M motion curve measurement of interventricular septum, left ventricular posterior wall, anterior wall and inferior wall motion. Shrink during peak time, relaxation time and time to peak systolic and diastolic relaxation time ratio. Results: 1. the results of coronary angiography: group MVD coronary angiography showed that the number of cases of collateral vessels rich significantly increased.2.2DE conventional parameter comparison results: compared with control group, MVD group, LVDd, IVSTd, LVPWTd, LAESd. The peak of E, E/A, a peak, LVEF showed no significant difference (P0.05), e peak A peak decreased and E/e increased, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05) compared the parameters measurement of left ventricular systolic function in.3.2D-STI results: (1) compared with the control group, GLS MVD group had no statistical significance Yi (P0.05), but MVD group of patients with basal segment, middle segment level after the interval and left ventricular wall under longitudinal strain decreased, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). (2) compared with the control group, MVD group, left ventricular apical section of the subendocardial myocardial longitudinal strain were decreased, the differences were statistically meaning (P0.05), but the middle section of left ventricular apical epicardial myocardial longitudinal strain and myocardial each section of full thickness myocardial longitudinal strain decreased overall there was no significant difference (P0.05).4.2D-STI and AMM measurement of left ventricular diastolic function parameters comparison results: (1) compared with the control group, patients in group MVD segment the ratio of SrE/SrA decreased, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). (2) between the two groups of left ventricular anterior wall, inferior wall, posterior wall, ventricular septal motion and systolic peak time showed no significant difference (P0.05). Compared with the control group, MVD group of patients with diastolic relaxation time, systolic The peak time and relaxation time ratio decreased, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: 1. dimensional speckle tracking strain layered technology can evaluate the coronary multivessel disease of left ventricular myocardial longitudinal layered strain, for the judgment of multivessel coronary disease in patients with early left ventricular systolic dysfunction and provide a new evaluation method combined with.2.AMM 2D-STI of multivessel coronary disease in patients with left ventricular diastolic function for effective evaluation, contribute to the simple, noninvasive screening of asymptomatic patients with multivessel coronary disease.
【学位授予单位】:大连医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R540.45;R541.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高晓慧;杨新春;王乐丰;崔亮;葛永贵;王红石;倪祝华;李惟铭;徐立;刘宇;;冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病单支病变和多支病变的血管壁结构的对比研究[J];中国循环杂志;2006年06期
2 杨晓帆,宫剑滨,江时森,陈锐华,张启高,王立军,彭永平,刘保军,邹莺;冠心病多支病变的心电图特征[J];临床心血管病杂志;2004年05期
3 贾如意;薛建峰;姜婕;王涛;虞化鹏;柳翠霞;殷洁;;综合心电图计分法在诊断冠心病多支病变中的应用[J];中国动脉硬化杂志;2007年02期
4 贾如意;张建华;薛建峰;姜婕;王涛;虞化鹏;柳翠霞;殷洁;;静息状态下心电图指标对冠心病多支病变诊断价值的比较[J];心脏杂志;2007年04期
5 杨晓帆;宫剑滨;江时森;陈锐华;;心电图判断冠状动脉多支病变的价值[J];中西医结合心脑血管病杂志;2007年12期
6 贾如意;赵成军;薛建峰;殷洁;柳翠霞;王涛;虞化鹏;;心电图计分诊断冠心病多支病变的意义[J];山东医药;2007年08期
7 薛建峰;贾如意;;心电图对冠状动脉多支病变的预测作用[J];心血管病学进展;2006年03期
8 李文俊;骆志玲;顾云;潘家华;沈艳;王钰;倪锐志;;应变率成像预测冠状动脉多支病变[J];中国医学影像技术;2011年05期
9 赵鑫峰;张美兰;李崇健;;冠脉多支病变与临床危险因素分析[J];中西医结合心脑血管病杂志;2013年01期
10 杨文灿;王恩荣;孙娜;刘海英;杨化浩;;aVF导联QRS波低电压预测冠脉多支病变[J];临床心电学杂志;2007年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 徐亚伟;;解读功能性SYNTAX积分对冠状动脉多支病变危险分层和预后评估的价值[A];浙江生物医学工程学会第九届年会论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 ;首次心肌梗死后择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期预后分析[N];中国医药报;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 沈刘忠;一站式复合再血管化技术治疗冠状动脉多支病变的临床应用研究[D];北京协和医学院;2016年
2 谢青;血清胱抑素C在冠心病诊断及冠脉病变评估的作用[D];山东大学;2012年
3 王浩然;一站式复合冠状动脉血运重建术与冠状动脉旁路移植术及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠状动脉多支病变中期疗效的对比研究[D];北京协和医学院;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张辉;冠心病左主干和(或)多支病变PCI/CABG术后随访(>7年)及危险因素分析[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2015年
2 王卫平;多支病变患者不同血运重建治疗后近中期临床疗效和生活质量对比性研究[D];郑州大学;2014年
3 阿力木·艾麦提;FFR在冠脉多支病变介入治疗中的指导作用[D];新疆医科大学;2015年
4 张征;益气活血、清热解毒法治疗冠脉多支病变不稳定型心绞痛临床疗效观察[D];山东中医药大学;2015年
5 张陈;冠脉多支病变患者罪犯血管处理与完全血管化治疗的临床预后效果观察[D];河北医科大学;2016年
6 支伟;OCT在STEMI合并多支病变冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用[D];河北医科大学;2016年
7 孙小龙;冠心病危险因素与冠状动脉多支病变相关性分析[D];吉林大学;2011年
8 刘文光;多支病变合并糖尿病完全血流重建对比研究[D];浙江大学;2015年
9 杨露;不同治疗方式对急性心肌梗死多支病变疗效的临床研究[D];上海交通大学;2008年
10 欧阳繁;血流储备分数(FFR)在冠脉多支病变中的应用价值[D];中南大学;2013年
,本文编号:1482740
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fangshe/1482740.html