中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对急性脑梗死患者预后的预测价值
本文选题:急性脑梗死 + 淋巴细胞 ; 参考:《中国脑血管病杂志》2017年02期
【摘要】:目的探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对急性脑梗死患者预后的预测价值。方法回顾性连续纳入2014年1月至2015年12月郑州大学第五附属医院神经内科住院的急性脑梗死患者307例,其中女80例,男227例。根据改良Rankin量表评分标准,分为预后良好组(195例)和预后不良组(112例)。记录入院时年龄、性别、既往病史、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分等资料,根据入院中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞计数计算出NLR值。采用Logistics回归分析急性脑梗死预后不良的影响因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价入院时NLR水平对急性脑梗死患者预后不良的预测作用。结果 (1)与预后良好组比较,预后不良组患者年龄、复发性脑梗死发生率、入院时NIHSS评分、入院NLR水平均较高,组间差异均有统计学意义[(69±12)岁比(62±14)岁,25.0%(28/112)比14.4%(28/195),5.00(3.00,9.00)分比3.00(1.75,5.00)分,3.66(2.62,7.91)比2.47(1.94,3.40),均P0.05],其余基线资料和临床特征的组间差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05)。(2)多因素Logistics回归分析结果显示,年龄、入院NIHSS评分及入院时NLR水平的升高,是预后不良的独立危险因素(OR值分别为1.030,1.148,1.427,95%CI分别为1.007~1.053,1.059~1.246,1.247~1.634,均P0.05)。(3)入院时NLR水平对急性脑梗死患者预后不良的诊断界值为2.84,其敏感度为69.6%,特异度为64.6%。结论入院时NLR水平增高对评估急性脑梗死患者预后不良具有一定的参考价值。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the prognostic value of neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Methods 307 patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted to the Department of Neurology, Fifth affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2014 to December 2015, including 80 women and 227 men. According to the modified Rankin scale, the patients were divided into good prognosis group (195 cases) and poor prognosis group (112 cases). Age, sex, past medical history and NIHSS score were recorded at admission. The NLR values were calculated according to the neutrophil count and lymphocyte count. Logistics regression analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic factors of acute cerebral infarction (ACI) and the predictive effect of NLR level on the prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) was evaluated by using the operating characteristics of the subjects. Results compared with the good prognosis group, the patients with poor prognosis had higher age, recurrent cerebral infarction rate, NIHSS score at admission and NLR level at admission. There were significant differences between the two groups [69 卤12 years old vs 62 卤14 years old: 28% 11: 12) vs 14.44% 28 / 195 5.003.00 / 9.00) scores compared with 3.00 1.755.00 scores (3.66 卤2.627.91) vs 2.471.94nd3.40g (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the other baseline data and the clinical features (all P0.05.2.0. 2). The results of Logistics regression analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the other baseline data and the clinical features (all P0.05. 2), and the results of Logistics regression analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, and clinical characteristics (P > 0.05), and the results of Logistics regression analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). The NIHSS score and the increase of NLR level on admission were independent risk factors for poor prognosis. The OR values were 1.030 / 1.148 / 1.427795 / 95 CI = 1.007 / 1.053 / 1.0591.2461.247/ 1.634, respectively. The threshold value of NLR level for the poor prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction was 2.84, the sensitivity was 69.6and the specificity was 64.6. Conclusion the increase of NLR level at admission has some reference value in evaluating the poor prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction.
【作者单位】: 郑州大学第五附属医院神经内科;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81571137) 河南省科技创新领军人才(52110052)
【分类号】:R743.33
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘观松;云南灯盏花注射液治疗急性脑梗死48例疗效分析[J];四川医学;2001年03期
2 李桂英,孟秋云;欣坦治疗急性脑梗死42例疗效观察[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2002年07期
3 马可夫,楮晓凡;急性脑梗死患者血清血管内皮生长因子的测定[J];中风与神经疾病杂志;2003年01期
4 郑晓红;硫酸镁佐治急性脑梗死40例疗效观察[J];临床医药实践;2003年09期
5 李玲,刘吉录;联合黛安神治疗急性脑梗死50例疗效观察[J];中国基层医药;2004年04期
6 彭华,郭洪志;急性脑梗死时全身炎症反应综合征与多脏器功能障碍综合征的临床研究[J];中华老年多器官疾病杂志;2004年02期
7 徐义祥;急性脑梗死124例诊治体会[J];皖南医学院学报;2004年03期
8 张清华,赵培;添加抗炎治疗对急性脑梗死疗效的影响[J];实用神经疾病杂志;2005年01期
9 郭百海;周丽;;经颅超声多普勒诊断急性脑梗死的价值[J];中国实用内科杂志;2006年S2期
10 翁保慧;;超敏C-反应蛋白与急性脑梗死的相关性分析[J];广西医科大学学报;2007年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 黄菊明;;探讨神经元特异性烯醇化酶在急性脑梗死患者中的临床价值[A];2007年浙江省神经病学学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
2 张允岭;;急性脑梗死毒损脑络学说基础与临床研究进展[A];第二届中西医结合脑病诊治新进展高级研讨班专家讲义及论文汇编[C];2010年
3 毛锐;聂志余;靳令经;封亮;陈玉辉;李云霞;;颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄或闭塞所致急性脑梗死类型研究[A];中华医学会第十三次全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 张小雨;张凤;王栋;张媛媛;李晓红;;急性脑梗死后血糖水平与轻度认知功能损害关系研究[A];2011全国老年痴呆与衰老相关疾病学术会议第三届山东省神经内科医师(学术)论坛论文汇编[C];2011年
5 耿亚兰;钟传林;杨清桦;;急性脑梗死患者超敏C-反应蛋白监测的临床意义[A];贵州省医学会第八届神经病学年会论文集[C];2010年
6 孙延文;;克栓酶两种剂量治疗急性脑梗死患者的疗效观察及护理[A];全国神经内、外科专科护理学术会议论文汇编[C];2002年
7 赵路清;崔爱勤;刘锦峰;张运生;王惠聪;郭学英;刘改生;郭志昌;;不同剂量金尔伦治疗急性脑梗死的临床研究[A];中华医学会第七次全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
8 吴云成;赵永波;谈永基;乔健;吕传真;;血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶与急性脑梗死患者远期预后的相关性研究[A];中华医学会第七次全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
9 刘军;富昭;鱼博浪;张明;丁晖;吴兰琴;邵莹;刘庆禄;;氢质子磁共振波谱在急性脑梗死诊断中的价值[A];人体断面数据获取与图像处理研讨会论文汇编[C];2005年
10 苏庆杰;陈志斌;蔡美华;王W,
本文编号:1921223
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jjyx/1921223.html