1型糖尿病儿童合并抑郁的患病现状调查及危险因素分析

发布时间：2018-03-12 21:22

  本文选题：糖尿病　切入点：型　出处：《中国糖尿病杂志》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的调查T1DM儿童合并抑郁的患病现状并分析其危险因素。方法选取T1DM患儿225例,根据Beck抑郁自评量表(BDI)评分为T1DM合并抑郁组(T1DM+抑郁,BDI10)123例;单纯T1DM组(T1DM,BDI≤10)102例。另根据BDI水平将T1DM+抑郁组分为轻度抑郁亚组(10BDI≤15)42例、中度抑郁亚组(16≤BDI25)40例及重度抑郁亚组(BDI≥25)41例。收集各组的临床资料,采用多元逐步回归和Logistic回归分析BDI评分水平及T1DM患儿合并抑郁的影响因素。结果(1)T1DM+抑郁组糖尿病病程[(5.89±1.52)vs(4.13±1.44)年]、FPG[(8.22±1.50)vs(7.37±1.23)rnmol/L]、HbA_1c[(9.55±0.94)%vs(7.57±0.58)%]、胰岛素用量[(61.75±13.54)vs(47.50±10.31)U]、DKA发生率[88(71.54%)vs 50(49.02%)]、低血糖发生率[48(39.02%)vs 19(18.63%)]及胰岛素注射2次/d比例[60(48.78%)vs 26(25.49%)]均高于T1DM组,胰岛素注射≤2次/d比例[27(21.95%)vs 51(50.00%)]低于T1DM组(P0.05或P0.01);(2)重度抑郁亚组年龄[(15.71±2.00)vs(12.18±2.32)vs(8.41±1.66)岁]、BMI[(19.44±2.18)vs(17.13±2.59)vs(17.52±2.41)kg/m~2]、FPG[(8.22±1.50)vs(7.37±1.23)vs(6.01±0.86)mmol/L]、HbA_1c[(10.58±1.34)%vs(9.05±1.23)%vs(8.42±1.41)%]、胰岛素用量[(65.43±15.68)vs(57.72±13.63)vs(50.69±12.44)U]及胰岛素注射2次/d比例[28(56.00%)vs15(30.00%)vs 7(14.00%)]均高于中度和轻度抑郁亚组,糖尿病病程[(3.22±1.01)vs(4.29±1.38)vs(5.74±1.35)年]低于中度和轻度抑郁亚组胰岛素注射≤2次/d比例[5(21.74%)vs 7(30.43%)vs 11(47.83%)]低于轻度抑郁亚组(P0.05或P0。01);(3)多元逐步回归分析发现,年龄、糖尿病病程、FPG、HbA。c、DKA发生率、低血糖发生率、胰岛素用量及胰岛素注射2次/d是BDI评分的影响因素(P0.05)。Logistic回归分析表明,女性患儿、糖尿病病程长、胰岛素注射2次/d、HbA_1c、DKA发生率和低血糖发生率高是T1DM儿童合并抑郁的危险因素(P0.05)。结论T1DM患儿合并抑郁的发生率较高,应及早筛查,及时干预。对于合并危险因素的患儿,应给予更多的心理关怀,预防抑郁的发生。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the prevalence of depression in children with T1DM and analyze its risk factors. According to the level of BDI, T1DM depression group was divided into mild depression group (n = 42), moderate depression subgroup (n = 16) and severe depression subgroup (n = 41). Multiple stepwise regression and Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the BDI score and the influencing factors of depression in children with T1DM. Results the course of diabetes in T1DM depression group [5.89 卤1.52 vs 4.13 卤1.44) years] FPG [8.22 卤1.50 vs 7.37 卤1.23rnmol / L] HbA1c [9.55 卤0.94VSD 7.57 卤0.58%], insulin dosage [61.75 卤13.54vs47.50 卤10.31U] DKA [8871.54V vs 5049.02a vs 5049.02a], and the incidence of hypoglycemia were as follows. The ratio of two times / d injection [60% 48.78% vs 260.49%] was higher than that of T1DM group. The proportion of insulin injection 鈮，

本文编号：1603341