中国团体心理治疗发展的文献计量分析

发布时间：2018-03-29 04:28

本文选题：中国　切入点：团体心理治疗　出处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2017年05期

【摘要】：目的:了解团体心理治疗在中国的发展现状,分析存在问题,明确未来方向。方法:从国内主要心理学期刊和硕博论文中筛选出386篇团体心理治疗研究文献,并使用内容分析法对其属性和内容、干预方案与研究方法进行计量与分析。结果:在文献属性和内容上,该领域研究最近15年增长明显;临床与亚临床研究的比例约为1∶4;53.9%的研究关注抑郁、焦虑障碍;定量研究占89.4%、效果研究占86.9%。干预方案上,认知行为取向(36.5%)高于其他;90.0%为12次以下的短期治疗团体;35.6%方案不明确和67.8%未说明领导者资历。研究方法上,取样以大学生(34.9%)为主;实验方法以实验法(34.9%)与综合法(44.6%)为主,统计分析以差异检验(58.3%)为主;研究设计中自我报告效果评估占91.4%,追踪不足22.0%;42.9%的研究可能存在一定的伦理问题。结论:我国团体心理治疗研究尚处于发展阶段,有待进一步的规范和完善。
[Abstract]:Objective: to understand the development of group psychotherapy in China, analyze the existing problems and determine the future direction. The content analysis method is used to measure and analyze its properties and contents, intervention schemes and research methods. Results: in terms of literature properties and contents, the research in this field has increased significantly in the last 15 years. The proportion of clinical and subclinical studies was about 1: 4% and 53.9% of the studies focused on depression, anxiety disorder, quantitative study accounted for 89.4%, effect study accounted for 86.9%. Cognitive behavioral orientation (36.5%) was higher than that of other short-term treatment groups with less than 12 times (35.6%) and 67.8% did not state leadership qualifications. In the research methods, the sampling was mainly for college students (34.9%) and experimental methods (34.9) and comprehensive methods (44.6%). In the research design, the self-report effect evaluation accounted for 91.4%, and there may be some ethical problems in the research of less than 22.0% and 42.9%. Conclusion: the research of group psychotherapy in China is still in the developing stage. To be further standardized and improved.
【作者单位】：清华大学心理学系;北京邮电大学心理素质教育中心;北京大学心理与认知科学学院;遵义医学院医学心理学教研室;
【基金】：基金项目:人际和谐心理健康促进技术研究(D151100002315002)
【分类号】：G353.1;R749.05

【参考文献】