负性认知加工偏向问卷的研制

发布时间：2018-04-09 07:00

本文选题：负性认知　切入点：问卷编制　出处：《第三军医大学学报》2017年23期

【摘要】：目的研制负性认知加工偏向问卷,并对编制问卷的信效度加以检验。方法以贝克负性认知加工偏向理论为依据,通过文献分析、问卷调查、个人访谈、小组讨论等方式确定问卷的初始项目,然后对638名大学生被试进行预测,并根据结果对项目进行修订。然后对社会层面不同职业的2 101人进行问卷调查,并随机分为样本1(n=1 050)和样本2(n=1 051),样本1数据进行项目分析、探索性因素分析,样本2数据进行验证性因素分析。最后运用2 101人的总体数据进行信度检验。结果问卷包括4个维度:负性注意偏向、负性记忆偏向、负性解释偏向、负性沉思偏向;探索性因素分析结果显示4个维度共可解释总问卷50.152%的变异;四维度模型拟合度良好(χ2/df=3.321,GFI=0.948,AGFI=0.934,NFI=0.886,CFI=0.917,RMSEA=0.047);Cronbachα系数为0.893,分半信度系数为0.866,校标效度分别为0.395(与贝克抑郁自评量表)、0.548(与功能失调性态度问卷);各因素与总分之间呈显著正相关(r为0.769~0.828,P0.01)。结论负性认知加工偏向问卷具有良好的信效度,可以对正常人的负性认知加工偏向进行测量。
[Abstract]:Objective to develop a negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire to test. In the Beck negative cognitive processing bias theory, through literature analysis, questionnaire survey, individual interview, questionnaire to determine the initial project group discussion and other methods, then carries on the forecast to 638 subjects, and according to the results the project was revised. Then conducted a questionnaire survey on the social level of different occupation and 2101 people were randomly divided into 1 samples (n=1 050) and sample 2 (n=1 051), 1 sample data exploration project, analysis of factors, 2 samples data by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, the use of the overall data of 2101 people the reliability test results. The questionnaire includes 4 dimensions: negative attentional bias, negative memory bias, negative interpretation bias, negative thinking bias; exploratory factor analysis showed that 4 dimensions can explain the total questionnaire 50 The variation in.152%; the four dimensions of the model fit well (x 2/df=3.321, GFI=0.948, AGFI=0.934, NFI=0.886, CFI=0.917, RMSEA=0.047); the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.893, split half reliability coefficient was 0.866. The criterion validity was 0.395 (with Beck depression scale, (0.548) and dysfunctional attitudes scale); there was a significant positive correlation between each factor and the total score (R, 0.769~0.828, P0.01). Conclusion the negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire has good reliability and validity, can negative cognitive processing bias of normal people were measured.

【作者单位】：第三军医大学心理学院行为医学教研室;解放军77322部队;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金面上项目(31640036) 全军医药卫生“十二五”重大项目(AWS13J003)~~
【分类号】：R749.4

【相似文献】