中文修订版孤独症谱系评定量表结构效度分析

发布时间：2018-05-23 07:47

本文选题：孤独症谱系障碍 + 结构效度　；参考：《中国当代儿科杂志》2015年12期

【摘要】：目的对中文修订版孤独症谱系评定量表(ASRS)问卷进行结构效度分析。方法选取某小学701名年龄在6~12岁之间的小学生作为调查对象,让所有小学生的父母填写ASRS问卷,将回收的有效问卷信息录入计分软件,系统自动评分,应用Mpuls 6.0软件进行结构效度分析。结果共发放ASRS问卷701份,回收671份有效问卷,回收率95.7%。671份问卷中,男368人(54.8%),女303人(45.2%)。中文修订版ASRS问卷3因子结构模型拟合指数中,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.053,比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.889,Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)为0.884,其指标均优于未修订版ASRS问卷(RMSEA:0.060,CFI:0.829,TLI:0.823)。结论修订后的ASRS问卷具有较好的结构效度,可作为ASD评估工具在我国推广使用。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the structural validity of the Chinese revised Autism pedigree rating scale (ASRSs). Methods 701 pupils aged between 6 and 12 years old in a primary school were selected as the subjects. The parents of all pupils were asked to fill out the ASRS questionnaire. The valid information of the questionnaire was entered into the score software, and the system scored automatically. The structural validity was analyzed by Mpuls 6.0 software. Results A total of 701 ASRS questionnaires were distributed and 671 valid questionnaires were collected. The recovery rate was 95.7.671 questionnaires. In the 3-factor structural model fitting index of Chinese revised ASRS questionnaire, the approximate error RMSEAA was 0.053, and the comparative fitting index was 0.889m Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), which was better than that of the unrevised ASRS questionnaire (RMSEA-0.060 / CFI: 0.829 TLI: 0.823). Conclusion the revised ASRS questionnaire has good structural validity and can be used as a ASD evaluation tool in China.
【作者单位】：复旦大学附属儿科医院神经内科;复旦大学附属儿科医院临床流行病学教研室;复旦大学附属儿科医院儿童保健科;
【基金】：国家卫生和计划生育委员会卫生行业专项(201302002) 上海市科委国际合作项目(14430712200)
【分类号】：R749.94

【参考文献】