健康焦虑元认知量表中文版在医学生中的信度与效度

发布时间：2018-05-23 20:20

  本文选题：健康焦虑 + 元认知　； 参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年03期

【摘要】：目的:在医学生样本中检验健康焦虑元认知量表中文版的信度和效度,并探索该量表在中国文化背景下的因素结构。方法:以健康焦虑元认知量表、简版健康焦虑量表、元认知问卷为研究工具,对919名大一到大四的医学生进行问卷调查,2周后抽取268名学生进行重测。结果:探索性因素分析表明,抽取3个因素最为合适,累积方差贡献率为47.223%。验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好(χ~2/df=1.828,NFI=0.916,IFI=0.960,CFI=0.960,TLI=0.950,RMSEA=0.041);总量表和3个分量表内部一致性信度在0.641-0.788之间,重测信度在0.501-0.742之间。结论:健康焦虑元认知量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于医学生健康焦虑的元认知测量。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Health anxiety metacognition scale in medical students, and to explore the factor structure of the scale under the Chinese cultural background. Methods: health anxiety metacognition scale, simple version health anxiety scale and metacognitive questionnaire were used as the research tool. 268 medical students from freshmen to senior students were selected for re-test after 2 weeks of questionnaire. Results: exploratory factor analysis showed that three factors were the most suitable, and the contribution rate of cumulative variance was 47.223. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the data fitted well (蠂 ~ 2 / dfg ~ (1.828) / NFI ~ (0.916) ~ (0.96) CFI ~ (0.96) ~ (0.96) ~ (0.96) ~ (0.950) RMSEAA (0.041), the internal consistency reliability of the total table and three subscales ranged from 0.641-0.788, and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.501-0.742. Conclusion: the Chinese version of health anxiety metacognition scale has good reliability and validity, and can be used for metacognitive measurement of health anxiety among medical students.
【作者单位】： 中南大学湘雅三医院心身健康研究所;
【基金】：湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(14TWB44)
【分类号】：R749.72
，

本文编号：1926190