成年人智能手机成瘾量表的初步编制
发布时间:2018-07-16 16:34
【摘要】:目的:编制成年人智能手机成瘾量表,并对其进行信效度检验。方法:通过开放式问卷调查和深度访谈收集原始项目,采用内容分析法整理归纳得到初始条目47条,样本1(n=851)用于项目分析及探索性因素分析,样本2(n=1004)用于验证性因素分析及信度检验。在样本2中随机选取89名被试于4周后进行重测。结果:智能手机成瘾量表最后保留26个条目,归纳为App使用、App更新、戒断反应、突显性、社会功能受损、生理不适6个因子,累积解释总方差的58.43%;具有良好的结构效度(χ~2/df=2.13,RMSEA=0.043,CFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,GFI=0.94)。总量表的α系数为0.909,6个维度的α系数为0.706~0.820;总量表的重测信度系数为0.931,6个维度的重测信度系数为0.743~0.850。结论:本研究编制的量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以用来测量成年人的智能手机成瘾情况。
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop the adult smartphone addiction scale and test its reliability and validity. Methods: the original items were collected through an open questionnaire survey and in-depth interviews, and 47 items were summarized by content analysis method. Sample 1 (nb851) was used for project analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Sample 2 (ng 1004) was used for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability test. In sample 2, 89 subjects were randomly selected and re-tested 4 weeks later. Results: at the end of the smart phone addiction scale, 26 items were retained, which were summarized as App updating, withdrawal response, salience, social function impairment, physiological discomfort, 58.43% cumulative interpretation of the total variance, and good structural validity (蠂 ~ 2 / 2 / dfU ~ (2.13) RMSEAA 0.043 CFI0.94IFI0.94 / 0.94). The 伪 coefficient of the total scale is 0.909, the 伪 coefficient of the six dimensions is 0.706 / 0.820, the test-retest reliability coefficient of the total scale is 0.931, and the retest reliability coefficient of the six dimensions is 0.743 / 0.850. Conclusion: the scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure smartphone addiction in adults.
【作者单位】: 湖南第一师范学院教育科学学院心理学系;中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所;
【基金】:湖南省高校科研项目(12C0611) 湖南省大学生创新性研究项目(YSXS1504)
【分类号】:R749.6
本文编号:2126972
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop the adult smartphone addiction scale and test its reliability and validity. Methods: the original items were collected through an open questionnaire survey and in-depth interviews, and 47 items were summarized by content analysis method. Sample 1 (nb851) was used for project analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Sample 2 (ng 1004) was used for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability test. In sample 2, 89 subjects were randomly selected and re-tested 4 weeks later. Results: at the end of the smart phone addiction scale, 26 items were retained, which were summarized as App updating, withdrawal response, salience, social function impairment, physiological discomfort, 58.43% cumulative interpretation of the total variance, and good structural validity (蠂 ~ 2 / 2 / dfU ~ (2.13) RMSEAA 0.043 CFI0.94IFI0.94 / 0.94). The 伪 coefficient of the total scale is 0.909, the 伪 coefficient of the six dimensions is 0.706 / 0.820, the test-retest reliability coefficient of the total scale is 0.931, and the retest reliability coefficient of the six dimensions is 0.743 / 0.850. Conclusion: the scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure smartphone addiction in adults.
【作者单位】: 湖南第一师范学院教育科学学院心理学系;中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所;
【基金】:湖南省高校科研项目(12C0611) 湖南省大学生创新性研究项目(YSXS1504)
【分类号】:R749.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 江光荣;当事人中心治疗取向在中国文化中的效度[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2001年03期
2 汤臻,李鸣;十八维度人格测定量表的信度和效度[J];上海精神医学;1998年03期
3 黄璞;郭毅;;常用各焦虑、抑郁量表的模型、因子、效度等综述[J];药物与人;2014年04期
4 王历;陆凯;王长鹰;胜利;胡大一;丁荣晶;;GAD-2和GAD-7在心血管门诊焦虑筛查中的信度与效度分析[J];四川精神卫生;2014年03期
5 史雷川;李公正;;视觉—运动整合发育测验及其应用[J];国外医学.妇幼保健分册;1993年03期
6 曹P;王建平;王馨蕊;高扬;;强迫量表儿童版在中国青少年中应用的信效度[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2013年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘琰;阈下抑郁量表的初步编制[D];北京中医药大学;2015年
,本文编号:2126972
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jsb/2126972.html
最近更新
教材专著