口服布美他尼联合康复训练治疗儿童孤独症的初步研究
[Abstract]:Aim: to observe the effects of rehabilitation training combined with bumetanil on social communication, verbal and nonverbal communication, and behavior of interest in newly diagnosed autistic children, so as to find a new treatment for children with autism. Methods: the data of 96 newly diagnosed autistic children in the Department of Pediatric Neurorehabilitation, Bethune first Hospital, Jilin University from October 2010 to December 2011 were collected. According to the parents' wishes, they were divided into three groups: bumetanil treatment group (26 cases), rehabilitation training group (32 cases) and rehabilitation training combined with bumetanil treatment group (38 cases). Rehabilitation training programs include interpersonal relationship development interventions, picture exchange communication systems, job therapy, speech therapy, autism and related disorder treatment education courses for children, applied behavioral analysis therapy, Denver model, The children received 4 kinds of training items every day for 30 minutes and 45 minutes at a time. Bumetanil: 0.3mg/ twice a day in children under 3 years old, 0.5mg/ twice a day in children over 3 years old, and no more than 2 times a day in children over 3 years old. The highest dose was no more than 2mg/ days. Three groups were evaluated by ABC,CARS,CGI before treatment and 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after treatment. Blood routine, urine routine, liver function, myocardial enzyme, renal function, blood ion, blood glucose and electrocardiogram were evaluated before and 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment of bumetanil in BUM group and RT BUM group, respectively. The blood routine, urine routine, liver function, myocardial enzyme, renal function, blood ion, blood sugar and ECG were evaluated. Results: (1) the data of three groups were compared: age, onset age, course of disease, place of residence, caregiver, pregnant age, paternity age, positive family history, number of births, birth type, birth weight, birth asphyxia history. There was no significant difference in reptile history and language development history between groups. (2) comparison of ABC scores before and after treatment: after treatment, the total score and single score of ABC in the three groups were lower than those before treatment. Six months after treatment, the total scores of ABC in the three groups were significantly lower than those before and after treatment. The total score and single score of ABC in the, RT BUM group decreased most significantly, followed by the RT group, and the last group was the BUM group. The difference among the three groups of ABC was statistically significant. (3) comparison of CARS scores before and after treatment: after treatment, the total score and single score of CARS in the three groups were lower than those before treatment. Six months after treatment, the total scores of CARS in the three groups were significantly lower than those before and after treatment. The total score and single score of CARS in the, RT BUM group decreased most significantly, followed by the RT group, and the last group was the BUM group. There was a significant difference in the total score between BUM and RT BUM group. (4) comparison of CGI scores before and after treatment: compared with pre-treatment, the SI of three groups decreased after treatment. 6 months after treatment, there were significant differences in SI between the three groups before and after treatment. SI,GI in, RT BUM group was decreased and EI was increased most obviously, followed by RT group, BUM group and RT BUM group SI,GI,. The difference of EI score was statistically significant. (5) comparison of retention rate after treatment: the retention rate in BUM group was 84.6% at 6 months after treatment (87.5% in 22 cases of); RT group and 86.8% in 32 cases of); RT BUM group in 28 cases). There was no significant difference in retention rate at 6 months after treatment among the three groups. (6) side effects observation: during the 6-month follow-up of three groups, no abnormality was found in blood routine, urine routine, liver function, myocardial enzyme, kidney function, blood ion, blood sugar and ECG in BUM group and RT BUM group. Conclusion: (1) bumetanil can reduce autism-like behavior in autistic children without obvious side effects. (2) the effect of rehabilitation training combined with bumetanil in the treatment of childhood autism was better than that of rehabilitation training alone.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:R749.94
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 钱宇虹,宋江顺;儿童孤独症诊治体会[J];中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志;2000年02期
2 张怀礼;儿童孤独症[J];健康生活;2001年07期
3 杨惠芳;103例儿童孤独症的临床脑电图分析[J];中原医刊;2005年08期
4 祝春霞;李荣;;儿童孤独症临床研究现状[J];贵州医药;2005年11期
5 ;卫生部:缺乏儿童孤独症核心症状药[J];临床合理用药杂志;2010年18期
6 张秀梅,金文焕;儿童孤独症5例报告[J];广东医学;1994年04期
7 孔杜斯,赵中玲,张春海;儿童孤独症3例报告[J];新疆医科大学学报;1998年01期
8 李建华,刘宙美,刘靖;儿童孤独症40例临床分析[J];江西医学院学报;1999年S1期
9 黄学军,许行健;儿童孤独症(附7例临床资料分析)[J];广州医学院学报;1995年02期
10 苗丹阳;47例儿童孤独症症状临床观察及分析[J];锦州医学院学报;2005年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 安继业;姚梅玲;;儿童孤独症临床表现分析[A];经济策论(下)[C];2011年
2 徐相蕊;舒丽梅;;84例儿童孤独症资料分析及诊治体会[A];经济策论(下)[C];2011年
3 胡德;;儿童孤独症音乐游戏疗法综述[A];中国音乐治疗学会第十届学术年会论文集[C];2011年
4 戴凌雁;;早期心理治疗对儿童孤独症的认识[A];全国精神科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2003年
5 郭萌;;GABRA4基因多态性与儿童孤独症的相关性研究[A];经济策论(下)[C];2011年
6 李雪荣;陈劲梅;;全程式治疗儿童孤独症的初步报告[A];西部大开发 科教先行与可持续发展——中国科协2000年学术年会文集[C];2000年
7 寻广磊;赵靖平;夏昆;;基于DNA芯片技术的Reelin基因单核苷酸多态性与汉族儿童孤独症易感性及“退化”临床表型的关联分析[A];中华医学会精神病学分会第九次全国学术会议论文集[C];2011年
8 孙雯;贾少微;高宙;胡疏;陈清;侯海峰;樊蓉;;应用SPECT分子影像评价儿童孤独症的针刺疗效[A];中华医学会第九次全国核医学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2011年
9 李飞华;;浅谈C-PEP在制订孤独症儿童IEP中的运用[A];中国心理卫生协会残疾人心理卫生分会第四届学术交流会论文集[C];2002年
10 焦公凯;王伟勇;张志s
本文编号:2435689
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jsb/2435689.html