3种颌面部创伤评分评估下颌骨骨折的比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-19 18:32

本文关键词： 下颌骨骨折颌面部创伤创伤评分　出处：《实用口腔医学杂志》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:比较2种颌面部创伤评分和一种下颌骨损伤评分用于下颌骨骨折严重度评估时有无差异。方法:对313例新鲜下颌骨骨折病例,应用MISS、MFISS、下颌骨损伤严重度评分(S5)3种颌面部创伤评分进行创伤严重度评分,对3种评分方法所得结果进行对比分析。结果:下颌骨损伤严重度评分与手术时间、手术费用、住院费用相关性最高,能有效区分单处骨折与多处骨折,是住院费用的显著影响因素。结论:下颌骨损伤严重度评分更适于下颌骨骨折损伤严重度的评估。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the difference between two kinds of maxillofacial trauma scores and one mandibular injury score in the evaluation of mandibular fracture severity. Methods: MISS was used in 313 cases of fresh mandibular fracture. MFISS, mandibular injury severity score and S5 trauma score were used to evaluate the severity of maxillofacial trauma. Results: the severity score of mandibular injury had the highest correlation with operation time, operation cost and hospitalization cost, and could effectively distinguish single fracture from multiple fracture. Conclusion: mandibular injury severity score is more suitable for the evaluation of mandibular fracture injury severity.
【作者单位】：北京大学口腔医学院;青岛大学附属医院口腔颌面外科;
【分类号】：R782.4
【正文快照】： 创伤严重度评分可以使颌面外科医生有效地理解损伤的严重程度,提供规范化的治疗措施,同时还可以作为判断预后的工具[1]。AIS-ISS评分系统被国际创伤学界认同,但该评分系统并不适用于颌面部创伤[2-3]。口腔颌面外科专家根据颌面部创伤的特点,建立了多种创伤评分体系,能够较准确

【相似文献】