不同修复材料对牙釉质及牙本质磨损性能的研究
本文关键词: 口腔修复材料 摩擦磨损实验 耐磨损性能 釉质 牙本质 出处:《华北理工大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:目的选用四种口腔常用修复材料,在体外与天然牙釉质及牙本质进行摩擦磨损实验,研究口腔修复材料与天然牙釉质、牙本质之间磨损性能的匹配情况,为临床选择修复体提供适当参考和实验依据。方法以未磨耗的天然牙釉质、牙本质牙尖为研究对象,以高度抛光的聚合瓷、玻璃陶瓷、氧化锆、纯钛为摩擦副。釉质组分为对照组、实验组,对照组为釉质牙尖与釉质对磨,实验组为牙尖分别与四种材料对磨;牙本质分组同釉质组。利用微摩擦磨损实验机,垂直向载荷15N,摩擦运动方式为往复运动,循环次数6000次,位移1mm,频率2HZ,使釉质、牙本质分别与聚合瓷、玻璃陶瓷、氧化锆、纯钛对磨,经处理得出摩擦系数等参数的变化曲线。采用扫描电镜观察牙尖及材料磨损前后的表面形貌,粗糙度仪测牙釉质、牙本质及材料的粗糙度,HVS-50Z型自动转塔数显维氏硬度仪测釉质、牙本质及材料的表面硬度,电子天平测釉质、牙本质牙尖摩擦实验后的质量损失量。结果1摩擦实验后,电镜下釉质牙尖表面显微形貌皆有划痕及脱落颗粒出现,其中釉质对照组、玻璃陶瓷组及纯钛组牙尖表面出现大量碎屑及疲劳裂纹,聚合瓷组牙尖表面较光滑,氧化锆组牙尖表面磨损严重,有犁沟存在。通过spss17.0对实验组及对照组实验后釉质牙尖的磨损量进行分析,实验组与对照组具有统计学差异(p=0.000,0.05),即四种材料及对照组对釉质牙尖造成的磨损量不完全相同。对实验组各组牙尖质量损失量与材料硬度之间进行关联性分析(r=0.979,0.8,P=0.004,0.05),相关性显著,可以看出硬度和质量损失量间具有高度正相关性,即随着硬度的增加,质量损失量也增加。其中釉质与玻璃陶瓷对磨后的磨损量与釉质对照组最接近。2摩擦实验后,电镜下牙本质牙尖表面显微形貌皆有划痕及脱落颗粒出现,其中牙本质对照组、聚合瓷组牙尖表面可见变形的牙本质小管形态,玻璃陶瓷组、纯钛组、氧化锆组牙尖表面磨损严重,牙本质小管不可见,磨损区有大量碎屑及犁沟存在。通过spss17.0对实验组及对照组实验后牙本质牙尖的磨损量进行分析,实验组与对照组具有统计学差异(p=0.000,0.05),即四种材料及对照组对牙本质牙尖造成的磨损量不完全相同;对实验组各组牙尖质量损失量与材料硬度之间进行关联性分析(r=0.846,0.8,P=0.147,0.05),相关性显著,硬度和质量损失间有高度正向趋势,即随着硬度的增加,质量损失量有一定程度增加。其中牙本质与玻璃陶瓷对磨后的磨损量与牙本质对照组最接近。结论不同材料均会对釉质、牙本质造成不同程度的磨耗,从磨损形貌、材料硬度及质量损失分析材料的耐磨性,玻璃陶瓷的耐磨性与釉质的性能相匹配,聚合瓷的耐磨性与牙本质的性能相匹配。因此临床对颌天然牙釉质存在的,修复体宜选用玻璃陶瓷作为其修复材料;对颌天然牙本质暴露的,修复体宜选用聚合瓷作为其修复材料。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the matching of wear properties between dental restorative materials and natural enamel and dentin in vitro by friction and wear experiments with natural enamel and dentin. Methods the unworn natural enamel and dentin cusp were used as the research objects, and the highly polished polymerized porcelain, glass ceramics and zirconia were used. Pure titanium was friction pair. The enamel group was divided into control group, experimental group, the control group was enamel cusp and enamel grinding, the experimental group was tooth tip and four kinds of materials respectively. The dentin was divided into the same enamel group. Using the micro-friction and wear test machine, the vertical load was 15N, the friction movement mode was reciprocating motion, the number of cycles was 6000 times, the displacement was 1mm and the frequency was 2HZ, so that the enamel could be made. Dentin and polymeric porcelain, glass ceramics, zirconia and pure titanium were ground, and the friction coefficient was obtained. The surface morphology of tooth tip and material before and after wear was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The roughness of tooth enamel, dentin and material were measured by rough degree instrument. The enamel was measured by HVS-50Z automatic turret, the surface hardness of dentin and material was measured by electronic balance, and the enamel was measured by electronic balance. Results 1 after the friction test, there were scratches and exfoliated particles on the surface of enamel cusp under electron microscope, including enamel control group. A large number of debris and fatigue cracks appeared on the cusp surface of vitreous ceramics group and pure titanium group. The surface of cusp of polymerized porcelain group was smooth, and that of zirconia group was serious. There were ploughing furrows. The wear amount of enamel cusp in experimental group and control group was analyzed by spss17.0. The difference between experimental group and control group was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Four kinds of materials and the control group did not cause the same amount of wear on the enamel cusp. The relationship between the weight loss of the tooth tip and the hardness of the material in each group of experimental group was analyzed. The correlation between hardness and mass loss is highly positive, that is, with the increase of hardness. The wear amount of enamel and glass ceramics was the closest to that of enamel control group. 2. After friction experiment, there were scratches and shedding particles on the surface of dentin cusp under electron microscope. In the dentin control group, the dentine tubules were deformed on the surface of the dental tip in the polymerized porcelain group, and the surface wear was serious in the vitreous ceramic group, pure titanium group and zirconia group, and the dentin tubules were not visible. There were a large number of debris and ploughs in the wear zone. The wear amount of dentin cusps in experimental group and control group was analyzed by spss17.0. There was a statistical difference between the experimental group and the control group (P < 0.05), that is, the four kinds of materials and the control group did not cause the same amount of attrition on the cusps of dentin. The correlation analysis between the weight loss of the tooth tip and the hardness of the material in each group of experimental group was carried out, and the correlation between the weight loss of the tooth tip and the hardness of the material was significant (P < 0. 147 / 0. 05). There is a high positive trend between hardness and mass loss, that is, with the increase of hardness. The mass loss increased to a certain extent. The wear rate of dentin and glass ceramics on grinding was the closest to that of dentin control group. Conclusion different materials will cause different degrees of wear on enamel and dentin. The wear resistance of the material and the wear resistance of the glass ceramics were analyzed from the wear morphology, hardness and mass loss of the material. The wear resistance of the glass ceramics matched the properties of the enamel. The wear resistance of polymeric porcelain is matched with that of dentin. Therefore, glass ceramics should be used as the restorative material for the clinical application of natural dental enamel. For the maxillary natural dentin exposed, the prosthesis should choose polymeric porcelain as its restorative material.
【学位授予单位】:华北理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R783.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马斌;刘玉柱;锁云华;;激光联合脱敏药治疗牙本质过敏的疗效观察[J];人民军医;2006年11期
2 杨洪侠;王华薇;伦杰;;调鉭、脱敏、充填法治疗重症牙本质过敏的临床体会[J];口腔医学;2007年06期
3 李江;陈卫;;酚醛树脂治疗牙本质过敏的疗效观察[J];中国当代医药;2010年35期
4 李光清;张学君;;极固宁治疗牙本质过敏的体会[J];中国医药指南;2013年11期
5 ;应用直流电解除牙体z┒粗票甘钡难辣局使鬧J];安医学报;1960年04期
6 李清泉;;硝酸钾饱和液治疗牙本质过敏[J];人民军医;1985年05期
7 宋凤至,于树珍;牙本质过敏的病因及治疗体会[J];广东牙病防治;1996年02期
8 孙卫斌;如何测评牙本质过敏的症状(二)[J];口腔医学;1996年02期
9 孙卫斌;如何测评牙本质过敏的症状(四)[J];口腔医学;1997年01期
10 史亚青;;咀嚼茶叶防治牙本质过敏[J];健康天地;2007年07期
相关会议论文 前7条
1 赵碧霞;;中西药结合治疗生理磨损性牙本质过敏[A];FDI、CSA临床口腔进展学术会议论文汇编[C];1999年
2 尹忠梅;李萍;邵明英;;综合治疗磨损所致牙本质过敏的疗效观察[A];全国第四次牙体牙髓病学术会议论文汇编[C];1995年
3 王跃才;;脱敏王治疗重症牙本质过敏临床效果观察[A];玉溪市医学会第八届口腔学术年会论文集[C];2007年
4 李雅萍;赵信义;李石保;;脱敏材料对牙本质通透性的影响[A];第八届全国口腔材料学术交流会暨中华口腔医学会口腔材料专业委员会2013年会论文集[C];2013年
5 徐逸敏;马晓蓬;刘国勤;刘筠;;医用胶治疗牙本质过敏的临床观察[A];FDI、CSA临床口腔进展学术会议论文汇编[C];1999年
6 李亚华;杨春英;卢爱工;李秀英;;100例新型脱敏含漱液和自制托盘载药联合治疗牙本质过敏的疗效随访及护理分析[A];全国口腔护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2004年
7 黄云亮;;3M Adper Prompt自酸蚀黏结剂治疗牙本质过敏的疗效观察[A];2004年上海市口腔医学学术年会论文汇编[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 ;老年人牙本质过敏的防治[N];人民政协报;2000年
2 王燕;牙本质过敏可致牙髓炎[N];卫生与生活报;2008年
3 健康时报记者 刘桥斌;牙齿怕冷怕酸也是病[N];健康时报;2008年
4 本报记者 李健;三成国人口腔患“感冒”[N];中国消费者报;2008年
5 于峰;牙齿酸痛怎么办?[N];大众卫生报;2006年
6 山东省济南市口腔医院副主任医师 王辉东;核桃仁可缓解倒牙[N];健康时报;2009年
7 中南大学湘雅医院 熊争鸣;倒牙是病莫忽视[N];大众卫生报;2003年
8 程鹏;碘化银治疗老年性牙本质过敏症[N];农村医药报(汉);2006年
9 马艳玲;磨牙患者警惕心病[N];医药养生保健报;2008年
10 杨海川;谨防牙体的磨耗[N];中国中医药报;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 李箐;氟/钾纳米羟基磷灰石涂膜的合成及其对牙本质的作用[D];四川大学;2006年
2 詹振林;龋齿修复与粘结性能的光学监测与评估[D];福建师范大学;2013年
3 唐成芳;原花青素对牙本质及粘接界面耐脱矿和再矿化能力影响的实验研究[D];第四军医大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李晨曦;不同修复材料对牙釉质及牙本质磨损性能的研究[D];华北理工大学;2016年
2 罗妍彦;半导体激光照射时间对牙髓及牙本质的影响研究[D];大连医科大学;2007年
3 郭敬茹;冷光美白剂对牙本质显微硬度影响的实验研究[D];辽宁医学院;2011年
4 李雅萍;牙本质通透性的测定及其应用研究[D];第四军医大学;2013年
5 王大铭;劲润牙本质保护膜对不同粘结剂与牙本质间剪切强度的影响[D];山东大学;2014年
6 王琼;多肽调控羟基磷灰石矿化及其在牙本质过敏治疗中的应用[D];清华大学;2012年
7 马勇;牙本质过敏症的不同治疗方法对牙本质影响的电镜观察[D];河北医科大学;2003年
8 林琪;Er,,Cr:YSGG激光消融对牙本质结构及成分影响的研究[D];福建医科大学;2010年
9 余晓芬;牙本质脱敏剂/粘结剂治疗牙本质过敏的临床疗效观察[D];浙江大学;2009年
10 刘乐华;劲润牙本质保护膜用于活髓基牙制备后敏感的临床疗效观察[D];新疆医科大学;2011年
本文编号:1465852
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/kouq/1465852.html