球帽和Locator附着体种植覆盖义齿的临床疗效评价

发布时间：2018-03-31 23:12

本文选题：种植覆盖义齿　切入点：球帽附着体　出处：《实用口腔医学杂志》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的:评价球帽附着体和Locator附着体应用于种植覆盖义齿的临床效果。方法:纳入无牙颌患者67例,共植入150颗Straumann或Bego种植体,完成球帽式或Locator式种植覆盖义齿修复。定期随访复查,包括修复后生物并发症和机械并发症情况和患者满意度调查。采用SPSS 17.0软件统计分析。结果:完成随访58例,球帽组35例,Locator组26例,球帽改Locator组7例。生物并发症比较显示,球帽组的牙龈增生发生率明显高于Locator组(P0.05);球帽组和Locator组的机械并发症发生率无显著差异(P0.05),但Locator组各类机械并发症的发生次数少于球帽组,球帽组平均修理频次为1.9次,Locator组为0.9次;Locator组患者对咀嚼和固位的满意度高于球帽组,不同性别的患者满意度无差异,满意度与患者的年龄和随访时间无相关性。结论:Locator式种植覆盖义齿相比球帽式种植覆盖义齿,临床效果具有一定优势。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the clinical effect of ball cap attachment and Locator attachment on implant-overdenture. Methods: totally 150 Straumann or Bego implants were implanted in 67 patients with edentulous jaws. Complete ball cap or Locator implant overdenture repair. Regular follow-up review, including biological complications and mechanical complications after repair and patient satisfaction survey. Statistical analysis using SPSS 17.0 software. Results: 58 cases were followed up. There were 35 cases in the cap group, 26 cases in the locator group and 7 cases in the Locator group. The incidence of gingival hyperplasia in the ball cap group was significantly higher than that in the Locator group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of mechanical complications between the ball cap group and the Locator group, but the frequency of various mechanical complications in the Locator group was less than that in the ball cap group. The average repair frequency was 1.9 times in the ball cap group and 0.9 times in the locator group. The satisfaction degree of mastication and retention in the locator group was higher than that in the cap group. There was no correlation between satisfaction and age and follow-up time. Conclusion compared with ball cap implant overdenture, the clinical effect of the overdenture is superior to that of the ball cap implant overdenture.
【作者单位】：北京交通大学社区卫生服务中心口腔科;首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院种植中心;
【分类号】：R783.6

【参考文献】