牙周-牙髓联合治疗重度牙周炎的疗效分析

发布时间：2018-07-02 12:24

本文选题：重度牙周炎 + 根管治疗　；参考：《上海口腔医学》2014年04期

【摘要】：目的:探索牙周-牙髓联合治疗对重度牙周炎患者的必要性。方法:收集2009年5月—2011年9月就诊于我院的重度牙周炎患者52例,随机分为A组和B组。A组患者给予牙周-牙髓联合治疗,B组患者给予单纯牙周治疗,分别记录2组患者在治疗前基线检查时、治疗后3个月、6个月、1 a、2 a的龈沟出血指数、探诊深度、附着水平,使用SPSS13.0软件包,采用t检验进行疗效分析。结果:治疗前基线检查时,A组与B组各观察指标的组间比较P0.05,差异无显著性。治疗后3个月,A组与B组各观察指标的组间比较无显著差异(P0.05)。治疗后6个月,A组与B组SBI有显著差异(P0.05);PD、AL比较无显著差异(P0.05)。治疗后1 a,A组与B组各观察指标的比较均有显著差异(P0.05)。治疗后2 a,A组与B组SBI比较无显著差异(P0.05);PD、AL比较有显著差异(P0.05)。结论:针对重度牙周炎患者进行牙周-牙髓联合治疗,远期疗效良好。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the necessity of combined periodontal-pulp therapy in patients with severe periodontitis. Methods: from May 2009 to September 2011, 52 patients with severe periodontitis in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups: group A and group B. The gingival sulcus bleeding index, probing depth and attachment level were recorded at baseline examination before and after treatment for 3 months and 6 months after treatment in both groups. SPSS 13.0 software package was used to analyze the curative effect. Results: there was no significant difference between group A and group B in baseline examination before treatment (P 0.05). 3 months after treatment, there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P0.05). There was significant difference in SBI between group A and group B 6 months after treatment (P0.05). There were significant differences between group A and group B after treatment (P0.05). There was no significant difference in SBI between group A and group B after treatment (P0.05). Conclusion: the long-term curative effect of periodontal-pulp combined therapy for severe periodontitis is good.
【作者单位】：无锡口腔医院牙周病科;
【基金】：江苏省临床医学科技专项基金(BL2013002)~~
【分类号】：R781.42

【相似文献】