不同牵引位点对骨性支抗上颌前方牵引应力分布的影响
[Abstract]:The purpose of the first part is to establish a three-dimensional finite element model of the skull and face including the skull, suture, tooth and implant. Methods: A complete 8-year-old male cadaver was selected to obtain the original DICOM data of the two-dimensional image of the head of children by spiral CT scanning, and the skull was generated by Mimics 10.0. The 3D models of facial skeleton, suture, tooth and implant are generated by Geomagic 9.0 software and stored in IGES format.The obtained IGES format file is imported into Abaqus 12.0 software according to XYZ coordinate system, and the mesh element parameters of the model are set up, which contain three-dimensional finite element models of craniofacial skeleton, nine bone seams, eight teeth and implant. Results: A three-dimensional finite element model of skull and face including skull, suture, tooth and implant was established, which was divided into 657,594 elements and 990,460 nodes. The geometric similarity was high. Part 2: The effect of different traction sites on the stress distribution of maxillary protraction with osseous anchorage. To analyze the effect of different traction sites on the stress distribution of skeletal class III malocclusion treated by maxillary protraction with bone anchorage, and to find the best traction site for the treatment of midface underdeveloped skeletal class III malocclusion. Boundary conditions, model material parameters, according to the following implant implant placement commonly used in clinic set traction sites, divided into four working conditions, working conditions 1: the distal and distal crown of the primary incisor 2 mm and the cervical gingiva 5 mm intersection point of alveolar bone; working conditions 2: the first primary molar crown 2 mm and the cervical gingiva 5 mm intersection point of alveolar bone; The alveolar bone of a molar crown was located at the intersection of 2 mm proximal to the middle of the crown and 5 mm to the gingival direction of the cervical margin, and the alveolar bone was located at the intersection of 2 mm distal to the middle of the first molar crown and 5 mm to the gingival direction of the cervical margin. The stress distribution of bone, suture and tooth, the displacement trend of suture and skull were calculated. Von Mises equivalent stress was calculated and the stress distribution nephogram and displacement trend diagram were drawn. In working condition 2, the stress value of the frontal and maxillofacial joints is the largest, and the stress range is 2.819 *10-2-1.477 *10-3 mpa. (2) The stress of the nasal and maxillofacial joints is mainly concentrated on the upper and lower edges in working condition 1 and 2, and the stress distribution is more uniform in working condition 3 and 4. (3) zygomatic suture: in condition 1 and 2, the stress mainly concentrates on the leading edge, but the range in condition 1 is larger; in condition 3, the stress mainly concentrates on the lower part; in condition 4, the stress mainly concentrates on the rear edge and distributes uniformly. (4) zygofrontal seam: the stress is mainly concentrated at the edge of the suture, which is slightly larger than that of 3,4 in working condition 1,2, and relatively uniform in working condition 3 and 4. The stress of zygofrontal seam is the largest in working condition 4, and the stress range is 3.169 *10-2-4.952 *10-4 mpa. The stress value of the bone seam is 1.587 *10-2-1.148 *10-3 MPa in working condition 3, followed by 1.367 *10-2-1.129 *10-3 MPa in working condition 4. (6) the middle palate seam: the stress distribution of the middle palate seam is more uniform in all working conditions, and the stress value is 7.300 *10-4-6.47 in working condition 1. The stress distribution characteristics of the first molar were as follows: (1) In working condition 1 and 2, the stress distribution of the first molar was more uniform, and the maximum stress was located in the neck of the mesial teeth. (2) First deciduous molars: in condition 1, the maximum stress of the first deciduous molar was concentrated in 1/3 of the root tip of the palate; in condition 2, the maximum stress was concentrated in the palate root near the root bifurcation. The stress value of the first deciduous molar was the largest in working condition 2, and the stress value ranged from 1.061 *10-1-4.048 *10-4 mpa. (3) Middle incisor, deciduous side incisor: the stress distribution of the middle incisor was more uniform in working condition 1; the stress distribution of the middle incisor in working condition 2, 3, 4 was concentrated in the apical 2/3 of the middle incisor in working condition 1. The stress distribution characteristics of the whole skull under different traction sites are as follows: under different working conditions, the stress distribution around the loading site (implant, eyebrow arch, temporomandibular joint fossa) is obvious. In addition, in working condition 1, the stress concentration appears obviously, including the bridge of nose, the back of nose, the ala of nose. In working condition 2,3,4, the stress distribution was mainly concentrated on both sides of the dorsum of the nose and the lateral part of the ala nasi. In working condition 1,2,3, the stress concentration area gradually decreased, and in working condition 4, the stress concentration area gradually increased. In working condition 1, 2, 3, the displacement tendency of the upper part of the zygotemporal suture was larger; in working condition 4, the displacement tendency of the upper part of the zygotemporal suture and the lateral margin of the zygotemporal suture was larger. The trend of displacement was mainly from the incisal margin of the anterior teeth to the top of the skull. The trend of displacement from the nasal root to the dorsal part of the nose was gradually reduced, while the trend of displacement from the alveolar process was gradually increased. Conclusion: 1. A three-dimensional finite element model of craniofacial skeleton, suture, tooth and implant is established. The model has high accuracy, good geometric and biomechanical similarity. 2 Implants anchor the maxilla forward, and it is easier to pull the maxilla forward when the traction site is close to the middle. Improve the depression of 1/3 in face and reduce the counterclockwise rotation of maxilla.
【学位授予单位】:河北医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R783.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗晨;秦晓中;曾照斌;冯雪;;不同部位植入微种植钉进行前方牵引时上颌骨旋转趋势[J];医用生物力学;2015年01期
2 胡骁颖;董福生;张铁军;马文盛;卢海燕;任国山;曹雷;李创;;儿童头部标本薄层断面数据集的建立[J];解剖学报;2011年01期
3 林伟就;邹敏;刘小兰;郑玉莹;;上颌前方牵引方向的有限元分析[J];上海口腔医学;2010年05期
4 李湘琳;管丽敏;邹敏;毛新霞;;改良式口内上颌支架式前牵引器的研制及临床应用[J];中国美容医学;2010年03期
5 安厚鹏;王敏;徐旭光;;上颌骨钛板支抗前方牵引治疗上颌后缩畸形的临床分析[J];口腔医学;2010年01期
6 朱秀娟;;有限元分析网格划分的关键技巧[J];机械工程与自动化;2009年01期
7 周彦恒;丁鹏;林野;邱立新;;钛板种植体上颌前方牵引治疗的初步应用研究[J];口腔正畸学;2007年03期
8 侯敏;柳春明;张海钟;张萍;白绍鹏;;不同承力点前牵引颅面骨骼的三维有限元研究[J];口腔医学研究;2007年04期
9 范建谊,叶湘玉,周洪,陈曦,王爽,陈挺;AngleⅢ患者上颌前牵引矫治时机的初步探讨[J];实用口腔医学杂志;2002年03期
10 谷岩,A.Bakr M.Rabie,Urban Hgg;前方牵引器治疗安氏Ⅲ类错畸形—20例病例临床分析[J];口腔正畸学;2000年03期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 胡骁颖;上颌牵引应力分布三维有限元分析及Angle'sⅢ错牙合上颌前牵引临床矫治研究[D];河北医科大学;2012年
2 侯敏;中位牵引前移面中份骨骼的实验与临床研究[D];中国人民解放军军医进修学院;2005年
,本文编号:2219539
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/kouq/2219539.html