年轻美貌人群颜面美学评判分析

发布时间：2018-11-16 13:31

【摘要】：目的:分析不同层次人群对南昌市海选的年轻美貌男女正侧面美学审美标准,以指导正畸临床工作。方法 :从南昌市各大高校中海选的赣籍青年美貌男女中选出14名年轻美貌男生和15名年轻美貌女生,近期拍摄正、侧面近观照片。由10名口腔正畸医师和85名不同年龄、不同性别的非口腔正畸专业人员独立对所有照片进行美学评判,分别选出各自心目中的最美貌年轻男女各1名,进行分组比较。结果:正畸医师对于青年男女面容美学评判存在明显差异,10名评判者结果差异极大,尤其对男生评判各不相同;非正畸专业人员对于年轻男女面容美学评判存在差异,但对于男生评判的统一性较女生高。具体来说,年轻人评判结果是男生13号、女生1号,年长者评判结果是男生7号、女生9号。男性评判者的结果是男生7号和13号、女生1号和9号,女性评判者的结果是男生13号、女生1号。结论:不论是正畸医师或非正畸专业人员,对于年轻男女面部美学评判标准均存在明显差异。提示正畸临床上对于矫治中患者面部的改善,应尊重患者及家属意见。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the aesthetic standards of young and beautiful men and women in different levels of Nanchang city to guide the clinical work of orthodontics. Methods: 14 young beautiful boys and 15 young beautiful girls from Jiangxi nationality were selected from the auditions of colleges and universities in Nanchang. Ten orthodontists and 85 non-orthodontics professionals of different ages and different genders were selected to judge all the photographs independently, and one of the most beautiful young men and women in their respective minds was selected and compared in groups. Results: orthodontists had significant differences in the evaluation of facial aesthetics of young men and women. The results of 10 judges were very different, especially for boys. Non-orthodontic professionals differ in the aesthetic evaluation of the faces of young men and women, but the uniformity of evaluation for boys is higher than that for girls. Specifically, the results of young people are 13 for boys, 1 for girls, and 7 for boys and 9 for girls. The results of male judges were 7 and 13 for boys, 1 and 9 for girls, and 13 for boys and 1 for girls for female judges. Conclusion: whether orthodontists or non-orthodontics professionals, there are significant differences in the evaluation criteria for young men and women face aesthetics. The results suggest that patients and their families should be respected for facial improvement in orthodontic treatment.
【作者单位】：南昌大学口腔医学院;南昌大学附属口腔医院;
【基金】：江西省科学技术厅二零零九零五科技支撑计划~~
【分类号】：R783.5

【参考文献】