两种不同清洗方法对管腔器械的清洗效果比较

发布时间：2019-01-11 12:01

【摘要】：目的比较两种不同清洗方法对管腔器械的清洗效果,提高管腔器械的清洗质量。方法随机抽取管腔器械100件,分为2组,分别用专用清洗架清洗管腔器械的全自动清洗消毒机与减压沸腾清洗机两种不同方法清洗后,使用带光源放大镜进行目测、ATP生物荧光监测法和残余蛋白定量法进行洁度检查,比较2组器械清洗效果;同时应用两种清洗方法将管腔类器械拆分到最小化后,对装载所需时间进行比较。结果试验组和对照组清洗质量检测,目测法合格率分别为100%和95%;ATP生物荧光监测法合格率分别为99%和81%;残余蛋白定量法合格率分别为96%和53%。试验组和对照组装载时间比较,腔镜器械清洗平均用时分别为5 min和25 min,呼吸机管道平均用时分别为2 min和10 min。结论减压沸腾清洗技术对管腔器械的清洗质量优于全自动清洗机,在前期人工处理时间上明显短于使用专用清洗架进行器械清洗的全自动清洗消毒机,显著提高了清洗效率。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the cleaning effect of two different cleaning methods to improve the cleaning quality. Methods 100 lumen instruments were randomly selected and divided into two groups. After cleaning with two different methods, automatic cleaning and disinfecting machine with special cleaning frame and vacuum boiling cleaning machine, a magnifying glass with light source was used for visual examination. The cleanliness of the two groups was examined by ATP biofluorimetry and residual protein quantification, and the cleaning effect of the two groups was compared. At the same time, two cleaning methods were used to separate the lumen instruments to minimize, and the loading time was compared. Results in the test group and control group, the qualified rate of visual method was 100% and 95% respectively, and the qualified rate of ATP biofluorimetry was 99% and 81%, respectively, and the qualified rate of residual protein quantitative method was 96% and 53%, respectively. Compared with the control group, the average cleaning time of the endoscopic instruments was 5 min and 25 min, respectively, and the average time of the ventilator tube was 2 min and 10 min., respectively. Conclusion the cleaning quality of vacuum boiling cleaning is better than that of automatic cleaning machine, and the time of manual treatment is obviously shorter than that of automatic cleaning and disinfecting machine using special cleaning frame, and the cleaning efficiency is improved significantly.
【作者单位】：西安交通大学第一附属医院;
【分类号】：R187

【相似文献】