全身麻醉手术中不同时机给予肢体约束的护理效果比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-18 01:07

本文关键词：全身麻醉手术中不同时机给予肢体约束的护理效果比较研究　出处：《吉林医学》2016年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:为了探究和比较针对全身麻醉手术患者不同时机给予肢体约束的护理效果差异。方法:选取收治的全身麻醉手术患者176例为研究对象,根据患者肢体约束护理给予的时机不同对其进行了分组。分成了对照组(给予常规的肢体约束措施)和研究组(麻醉诱导期和复苏期给予非肢体约束措施),每组患者88例。观察和比较两组患者意外拔管发生率、诱导期躁动发生率、复苏期躁动发生率和手术舒适度。结果:1复苏期躁动发生率组间比较,研究组低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);2舒适度组间比较,研究组高于对照组,差异有显著统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:麻醉诱导期和复苏期给予非肢体约束措施的护理效果显著,可降低患者复苏期躁动发生率,显著提升患者手术舒适度。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore and compare the nursing effects of limb restraint in patients undergoing general anesthesia operation at different times. Methods: 176 patients undergoing general anesthesia surgery were selected as the research objects. The patients were divided into two groups according to the timing of limb restraint nursing. They were divided into two groups: control group (routine limb restraint measures) and study group (anesthesia induction period and rehabilitation period were given non-limb restraint measures). The incidences of accidental extubation, induced restlessness, restlessness during resuscitation and surgical comfort were observed and compared between the two groups. Results the incidence of restlessness in the resuscitation stage was compared between the two groups. The study group was lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). 2Compared with the comfort group, the study group was higher than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: the nursing effect of non-limb restraint measures in induction period and resuscitation stage of anesthesia is remarkable. It can reduce the incidence of restlessness in the resuscitation stage and significantly improve the surgical comfort of the patients.
【作者单位】：广东省深圳市龙岗区第二人民医院手术室;
【分类号】：R472.3
【正文快照】：

【相似文献】