喉罩麻醉与气管插管麻醉在婴儿麻醉中的应用效果对比

发布时间：2018-04-18 07:07

本文选题：喉罩麻醉 + 气管插管麻醉　；参考：《航空航天医学杂志》2016年09期

【摘要】：目的探讨喉罩麻醉与气管插管麻醉在婴儿麻醉中的应用效果对比。方法选取62例择期手术患儿,数字抽取分成观察组和对照组,观察组应用喉罩麻醉,对照组予以气管插管麻醉,对比两组中心静脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、置入导管前后呼末的气道峰压(Ppeak)、二氧化碳分压(PETC02)变化,导管拔管时间及清醒时间。结果观察组导管拔管时间、清醒时间少于对照组(P0.05);观察组MAP、HR变化及Ppeak均低于对照组(P0.05);观察组PETC02变化高于对照组(P0.05)。结论婴儿麻醉中喉罩麻醉与气管插管麻醉比较操作更为简便、气道损伤低、苏醒快等优势明显,临床应用价值更高。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the application of laryngeal mask anesthesia and tracheal intubation anesthesia in infants.Methods Sixty-two children undergoing elective operation were divided into observation group and control group. Laryngeal mask anesthesia was used in the observation group and tracheal intubation anesthesia was performed in the control group.The changes of central venous pressure (MAPP), heart rate (HRV), peak airway pressure (Ppeaka) and carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETC02) before and after catheter placement were compared between the two groups. The extubation time and waking time of the catheter were also compared between the two groups.Results the time of catheter extubation in the observation group was less than that in the control group (P 0.05), the changes of HR and Ppeak in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P 0.05), and the change of PETC02 in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P 0.05).Conclusion laryngeal mask anesthesia is more convenient than tracheal intubation anesthesia in infant anesthesia. The advantages of lower airway injury and faster recovery are obvious, and the clinical application value is higher than that of larynx mask anesthesia and tracheal intubation anesthesia.
【作者单位】：佛山市第一人民医院;
【分类号】：R726.1

【相似文献】