当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 麻醉学论文 >

分析和比较不同麻醉方式下直肠癌术后患者的疼痛情况

发布时间:2018-05-04 16:55

  本文选题:麻醉方式 + 硬膜外复合全身麻醉 ; 参考:《中国实用医药》2016年26期


【摘要】:目的分析比较不同麻醉方式下直肠癌术后患者的疼痛情况。方法 50例采取直肠癌手术患者,随机分为A组和B组,各25例。A组使用单纯全身麻醉(全麻)方式,B组使用硬膜外复合全麻,对比分析两组患者术后苏醒时间、术后疼痛情况、麻醉后监测治疗室(PACU)停留的时间。结果 A组总有效率为100.0%,B组总有效率为52.0%;比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。B组术后苏醒时间为(25.40±4.18)min,A组为(50.40±4.57)min;B组PACU停留的时间为(29.40±4.54)min,A组为(55.40±4.12)min;比较差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论在直肠癌手术中采用硬膜外复合全麻方式,所需药物较少,且患者术后苏醒时间较短,有利于缓解患者术后疼痛情况,值得在临床中推广。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze and compare the postoperative pain of rectal cancer under different anesthetic methods. Methods Fifty patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery were randomly divided into two groups: group A (n = 25) and group B (n = 25) were treated with simple general anesthesia (general anesthesia) and group B (n = 25) were treated with epidural combined general anesthesia. Postoperative pain and duration of stay in the treatment room were monitored after anesthesia. Results the total effective rate of group A was 100.0 and the total effective rate of group B was 52.0, and the postoperative recovery time of group A was 25.40 卤4.18 min and that of group A was 50.40 卤4.57 min. The total effective rate of group B was 55.40 卤4.12 min in group B, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion the method of epidural combined with general anesthesia in rectal cancer surgery requires less drugs and shorter recovery time after operation, which is helpful to relieve the postoperative pain and is worth popularizing in clinic.
【作者单位】: 辽宁省人民医院麻醉科;
【分类号】:R614;R735.37

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 沈曲;李峥;;休斯顿疼痛情况调查表信度和效度的研究[J];中华护理杂志;2006年11期

2 夏桂兰,姜文珍;癌症病人疼痛情况调查及对策探讨[J];肿瘤防治研究;1999年06期

3 顾为雄;;儿童期腹痛[J];国外医学参考资料(儿科学分册);1974年02期

4 薛敏;孙丽燕;李宇新;;骨科术后患者疼痛情况调查及护理干预[J];临床医药实践;2006年10期

5 思健;;趣话唇色与健康[J];晚晴;2010年11期

6 ;[J];;年期



本文编号:1843834

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1843834.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户21f75***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com