当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 内分泌论文 >

牙周基础治疗对老年2型糖尿病牙周炎患者脂联素、炎症因子及糖代谢的影响

发布时间:2018-07-27 17:06
【摘要】:目的探讨牙周基础治疗对老年2型糖尿病(T2DM)牙周炎患者脂联素、炎症因子、糖代谢指标的影响。方法选择患有T2DM的老年牙周炎患者98例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组49例。两组继续糖尿病的基础治疗,对照组给予口腔卫生指导,观察组在此基础行牙周基础治疗。观察比较两组治疗前后菌斑指数(PLI),探诊深度(PD),龈沟出血指数(SBI)、空腹血糖(FPG),餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG),糖化血红蛋白(Hb A1c),白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、脂联素(APN)、载脂蛋白(Apo)A1水平。结果治疗后,两组PLI、PD、SBI均较治疗前显著降低(PLI对照组t=4.81,P=0.00,观察组t=9.32,P=0.00;PD对照组t=3.75,P=0.00:观察组t=7.54,P=0.00;SBI对照组t=4.74,P=0.00,观察组t=9.10,P=0.00),且观察组降低幅度明显优于对照组(均P0.05)。治疗后,对照组糖代谢指标较治疗前变化不显著(P0.05),观察组FPG、2 h PG及Hb A1c均较治疗前显著降低(t=2.45,P=0.008;t=5.61,P=0.00;t=2.40,P=0.008),较对照组治疗后显著降低(P0.05);两组IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α水平均明显低于治疗前(IL-1β对照组t=5.13,P=0.00,观察组t=11.69,P=0.00,IL-6对照组t=14.59,P=0.00,观察组t=32.41,P=0.00;TNF-α对照组t=5.69,P=0.00观察组t=11.96,P=0.00),Apo A1、APN水平显著高于治疗前(APN对照组t=13.83,P=0.00,观察组t=16.75,P=0.00;Apo A1对照组t=2.43,P=0.01,观察组t=3.97,P=0.00)(P0.05),且观察组各指标均较对照组显著升高(均P0.05)。结论牙周基础治疗可以改善体内糖代谢,降低炎症因子水平,促进APN、Apo A1表达。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effects of periodontal therapy on adiponectin, inflammatory factors and glucose metabolism in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods 98 cases of senile periodontitis with T2DM were randomly divided into control group (n = 49) and observation group (n = 49). The two groups continued the basic treatment of diabetes, the control group was given oral hygiene guidance, the observation group was treated with periodontal basic therapy. The plaque index (PLI), probing depth (PD), gingival sulcus bleeding index (SBI), fasting blood glucose (FPG),) 2 h postprandial blood glucose (HbA1c), interleukin (IL) 1 尾 sil 6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) 伪, adiponectin (APN), apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 were observed and compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results after treatment, the levels of PLI in the control group were significantly lower than those in the control group (t = 4.81, P ~ (0.00), while in the control group, t ~ (3.75) P _ (P ~ (0.00); in the observation group, there was a significant difference between the control group and the control group (P < 0.05), and the decrease in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (all P 0.05), and that in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (all P 0.05), and that in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), while in the observation group, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, There was no significant change in glucose metabolism in the control group (P0.05), but the levels of PG and HbA1c in the observation group were significantly lower than those before the treatment (t 2.45% P0. 008, P 0. 008), which were significantly lower than those in the control group (P0.05), and the levels of IL-1 尾-IL-6TNF- 伪 in the two groups were significantly lower than those before the treatment (IL-1 尾 control group, t5. 13P, P < 0. 008), while in the control group, the levels of IL-1 尾 -IL-6TNF- 伪 were significantly lower than those in the control group (P0.05), and the levels of TNF- 伪 in the two groups were significantly lower than those in the control group. The levels of APN in the control group were significantly higher than those before the treatment (APN control group, t13.83 P0. 00. the observation group was 16.75, the control group was t2.43 P0. 01, the observation group was t3.977P0.00) (P0.05), and each index in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P0.05), and the levels of APN in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P 0.05). The levels of APN in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (t 13.83 P0. 00. the observation group had a significant difference between the observation group and the control group (P 0.05). The results showed that the control group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05), and the control group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05), and the levels of APO A were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (P 0.05). Conclusion periodontal basic therapy can improve glucose metabolism, decrease the level of inflammatory factors and promote the expression of APN Apo A1 in vivo.
【作者单位】: 浙江萧山医院口腔科;
【分类号】:R587.1;R781.42

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李秦;冯雪;;牙周炎伴2型糖尿病患者牙周基础治疗的临床意义[J];陕西医学杂志;2009年06期

2 张煜;李雪;滕志海;;牙周基础治疗对糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响[J];实用口腔医学杂志;2009年05期

3 陈云秀;任煜琛;;牙周炎伴2型糖尿病患者牙周基础治疗效果研究[J];中国医学工程;2012年11期

4 伍明,伍英,曾立,王宁;糖尿病并牙周炎牙周基础治疗的临床观察[J];江西医药;2005年10期

5 李静;;牙周基础治疗对2型糖尿病伴牙周炎糖化血红蛋白和血脂水平的影响[J];昆明医学院学报;2008年04期

6 张军华;;牙周基础治疗对2型糖尿病合并牙周炎的疗效研究[J];中国医学工程;2014年07期

7 潘国金;;牙周基础治疗对全身骨密度的影响[J];现代实用医学;2010年01期

8 徐菁玲;孟焕新;;牙周基础治疗对2型糖尿病患者糖、脂代谢的影响[J];北京大学学报(医学版);2014年02期

9 杨泓;治疗牙周炎对老年2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的影响[J];中华老年医学杂志;2005年06期

10 徐静;强艳丽;刘道峰;周蕊;汤玲;邱宏亮;;低频脉冲电磁场辅助牙周基础治疗对绝经后骨质疏松患者牙周炎的疗效观察[J];山东医药;2009年26期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 王新国;王红梅;李南方;张德莲;常桂娟;王新玲;祖菲亚;周克明;王国亮;;原发性醛固酮增多症患者糖代谢紊乱情况的分析[A];第十三次全国心血管病学术会议论文集[C];2011年

2 张子韬;陈小燕;黄华兴;苏淑贞;谢福武;曾彦茹;丘丽冰;;糖代谢异常患者住院死亡特点分析[A];2006年中华医学会糖尿病分会第十次全国糖尿病学术会议论文集[C];2006年

3 殷应传;余本富;梅周;何巧娟;周晓惠;何凡;何z,

本文编号:2148539


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/nfm/2148539.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户13259***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com