MSM人群HIV感染者梅毒RPR试验假阳性分析

发布时间：2018-03-18 03:22

本文选题：人类免疫缺陷病毒　切入点：梅毒　出处：《中国皮肤性病学杂志》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的了解男男同性恋者(MSM)中人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者梅毒快速血浆反应素环状卡片试验(RPR)生物学假阳性反应(BFP)情况。方法对我院MSM人群筛查队列进行RPR试验、梅毒螺旋体明胶凝集试验(TPPA)试验和HIV抗体初筛,比较梅毒RPR生物学假阳性(RPR-BFP)发生情况。结果共10 000例MSM,HIV抗体阳性者中,RPR-BFP 0.15%(3/1 989);HIV抗体阴性者中,RPR-BFP0.27%(22/8 011)。该两组人群RPR试验假阳性率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 HIV感染没有增加梅毒RPR生物学假阳性反应。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the rapid plasma reactive hormone (RPR) positive biological-false positive reaction of syphilis infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in male homosexuals (MSM). Methods the RPR test was performed on the screening cohort of MSM population in our hospital. Treponema pallidum gelatin agglutination test and HIV antibody screening, Results the incidence of RPR-BFP 0.15% RPR-BFP in 10 000 patients with positive RPR antibody was compared. Conclusion there is no significant difference in false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in the false positive rate of RPR-BFP 0.27 and 22 / 8 0111.Conclusion there is no significant difference in the false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in the false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. To increase the biological false positive reaction of syphilis RPR.
【作者单位】：首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院;
【分类号】：R512.91;R759.1

【相似文献】