当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 神经病学论文 >

颈内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者侧支循环与搏动指数及持续注意功能的相关性研究

发布时间:2019-03-07 09:18
【摘要】:目的探讨颈内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者侧支循环与搏动指数(PI)及持续注意功能的相关性。方法对135例颈内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者进行DSA检查并根据侧支循环开放情况分组。另选择30名健康老年人作为对照组。采用TCD检查检测双侧大脑中动脉收缩期和舒张期血流速度(Vs和Vd)、平均血流速度(Vm)和PI。采用持续性操作测验的遗漏数、认错数、平均反应时评估持续注意功能。对结果进行比较分析。结果 (1)135例颈内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者根据侧支循环开放情况分为前交通动脉(AcoA)开放组(31例)、后交通动脉(PcoA)开放组(20例)、AcoA+PcoA开放组(19例)、初级侧支循环开放组(即AcoA、PcoA、AcoA+PcoA开放)(70例)、次级侧支循环开放组(主要包括眼动脉、软脑膜吻合支和新生供血血管)(15例)、初级+次级侧支循环开放组(13例)和无侧支循环开放组(37例)。(2)与对照组比较,其余各组患者的Vs、Vd、Vm和PI均显著降低(均P0.05)。与无侧支循环开放组比较,AcoA开放组、初级侧支循环开放组的Vd及AcoA+PcoA开放组的Vd、Vm均明显升高,AcoA开放组、AcoA+PcoA开放组、初级侧支循环开放组及初级+次级侧支循环开放组的PI均明显降低(均P0.05)。与PcoA开放组比较,AcoA开放组、AcoA+PcoA开放组的PI均明显降低(均P0.05)。与次级侧支循环开放组比较,初级侧支循环开放组的Vs、Vd、Vm和初级+次级侧支循环开放组的Vd、Vm均明显升高,初级侧支循环开放组和和初级+次级侧支循环开放组的PI均明显降低(均P0.05)。(3)与对照组比较,其余各组患者的遗漏数、认错数和平均反应时均显著增加(均P0.05)。与无侧支循环开放组比较,AcoA开放组、AcoA+PcoA开放组及初级侧支循环开放组的遗漏数、认错数和平均反应时均明显减少;初级+次级侧支循环开放组的遗漏数和认错数均明显减少(均P0.05)。与PcoA开放组比较,AcoA开放组的遗漏数和认错数均明显减少;AcoA+PcoA开放组的遗漏数、认错数和平均反应时均明显减少(均P0.05)。与AcoA+PcoA开放组比较,AcoA开放组的遗漏数、认错数和平均反应时均明显增加(均P0.05)。与次级侧支循环开放组比较,初级侧支循环开放组的遗漏数、认错数和平均反应时均明显减少;初级+次级侧支循环开放组的遗漏数和认错数均明显减少(均P0.05)。(4)AcoA开放组、初级侧支循环开放组和次级侧支循环开放组的PI与平均反应时呈正相关(r=0.441,r=0.364,r=0.552;均P0.05)。PcoA开放组和无侧支循环开放组的PI与遗漏数呈正相关(r=0.668,r=0.397;均P0.05);与认错数呈正相关(r=0.509,r=0.480;均P0.05)。结论颈内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者患侧高PI可反映其持续注意功能受损。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the correlation between collateral circulation and pulsatility index (PI) and continuous attention function in patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of internal carotid artery. Methods DSA was performed in 135 patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of internal carotid artery and divided into groups according to the opening of collateral circulation. Another 30 healthy elderly were selected as control group. Measurement of systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity (Vm) and PI.) of bilateral middle cerebral artery (Vs and Vd),) by TCD Continuous attention function was assessed by the number of omissions, the number of errors identified, and the mean response time of the continuous operation test. The results were compared and analyzed. Results (1) the patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of internal carotid artery were divided into anterior communicating artery (AcoA) group (31 cases) and posterior communicating artery (PcoA) group (20 cases of), AcoA PcoA open group (19 cases) according to the opening of collateral circulation). The primary collateral circulation (AcoA,PcoA,AcoA PcoA) group (70 cases), the secondary collateral circulation open group (mainly including ophthalmic artery, meningeal anastomotic branch and neovascularization) (15 cases), the primary collateral circulation open group (70 cases), and the secondary collateral circulation open group (15 cases). Compared with the control group, the Vs,Vd,Vm and PI in the primary and secondary collateral circulation open group (13 cases) and the non-collateral circulation open group (37 cases). (2) were significantly lower than those in the control group (P 0.05). Compared with non-collateral circulation open group, Vd and Vd,Vm in AcoA open group, primary collateral circulation open group and AcoA PcoA open group were significantly higher than those in AcoA open group, AcoA PcoA open group in AcoA open group, and, AcoA PcoA open group in AcoA open group. The PI of primary collateral circulation open group and primary secondary collateral circulation open group were significantly lower than those of primary collateral circulation open group (P0.05). Compared with PcoA open group, PI of, AcoA PcoA open group in AcoA open group was significantly lower than that of, AcoA PcoA open group (P0.05). Compared with the secondary collateral circulation open group, the Vs,Vd,Vm in the primary collateral circulation open group and the Vd,Vm in the primary collateral circulation open group were significantly higher than those in the secondary collateral circulation open group. The PI of the primary collateral circulation open group and the primary secondary collateral circulation open group were significantly lower than that of the control group (P0.05). (3), and the number of omissions in the other groups was significantly lower than that of the control group. The number of errors and the average reaction time were significantly increased (P0.05). Compared with the open group without collateral circulation, the number of omissions, the number of errors and the mean reaction time in AcoA open group and, AcoA PcoA open group and primary collateral open group were significantly decreased. The number of omissions and errors in the primary and secondary collateral circulation open group were significantly decreased (P0.05). Compared with the open group of PcoA, the number of omissions and the number of errors admitted in the open group of AcoA significantly decreased, and the number of errors and the mean response time decreased significantly in the open group of; AcoA PcoA (P0.05). Compared with the open group of AcoA PcoA, the number of omissions, the number of errors and the mean reaction time in the open group of AcoA were significantly increased (P0.05). Compared with the secondary collateral circulation open group, the number of omissions, the number of errors and the mean reaction time were significantly decreased in the primary collateral circulation open group. The number of omissions and errors in the primary and secondary collateral circulation open group were significantly decreased (P0.05). (4). The PI in the primary collateral circulation open group and the secondary collateral circulation open group was positively correlated with the mean reaction time (r = 0.441, P < 0.05). R = 0.364, r = 0.552, r = 0.364, r = 0.552; There was a positive correlation between PI and the number of omissions in PcoA open group and no collateral circulation open group (r = 0.668, r = 0.397; both P 0.05), and positively correlated with the number of errors (r = 0.509, r = 0.480; both P 0.05). Conclusion High PI on the affected side of patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of internal carotid artery can reflect the impairment of continuous attention function.
【作者单位】: 西南医科大学附属医院神经内科;
【基金】:泸州医学院附属医院青年基金项目(2015-QS-034)
【分类号】:R743.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 艾志兵;罗国君;何国厚;张晓东;孙强;;颅内动脉侧支循环的形成对基底动脉尖综合征预后的影响[J];湖北医药学院学报;2010年05期

2 陈晨;刘训灿;冯加纯;;脑供血侧支循环建立的影响因素及评估[J];中华脑血管病杂志(电子版);2011年05期

3 张毓英;李为民;刘文慧;赵连东;;关于急性缺血性脑血管病侧支循环评价的思考[J];脑与神经疾病杂志;2008年01期

4 王拥军;;脑侧支循环及氧化应激对其影响[J];中国卒中杂志;2008年03期

5 李继梅;;专题综述:侧支循环[J];中国卒中杂志;2014年08期

6 蔡俊颖;董强;付建辉;;脑动脉狭窄或闭塞后侧支循环与卒中预后的关系[J];神经损伤与功能重建;2007年03期

7 王磊;张雄伟;;评估颅内外动脉侧支循环的方法及临床意义[J];中华老年心脑血管病杂志;2012年08期

8 姬卫东;徐丽君;;侧支循环功能与缺血性脑血管病[J];中风与神经疾病杂志;2007年03期

9 郭海燕;张宝利;王小沙;;颅内血管狭窄或闭塞侧支循环与临床症状的关系[J];中西医结合心脑血管病杂志;2009年09期

10 胡薇薇;叶静;;颈动脉系统短暂性脑缺血发作患者侧支循环的分析[J];中国脑血管病杂志;2012年08期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 赵静;李晓红;;脑侧支循环与缺血性脑卒中[A];山东省2013年神经内科学学术会议暨中国神经免疫大会2013论文汇编[C];2013年

2 姬卫东;徐丽君;周玉珍;;侧支循环功能与缺血性脑卒中[A];第七届全国颅脑及颈动脉超声学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

3 刘作勤;;脑动脉侧支循环建立的临床意义[A];第二届全国非血管性与血管性介入新技术学术研讨会暨第三届介入放射学新技术提高班论文汇编[C];2005年

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 记者 靖九江;改善侧支循环,,药物应用需个体化[N];中国医药报;2013年

2 本报记者 王海洋;侧支循环“新概念”[N];医药经济报;2013年

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 陈辉;通透性影像评估缺血性卒中Ⅱ、Ⅲ级侧支循环[D];第三军医大学;2015年

2 刘文华;成年型烟雾病侧支循环的临床研究[D];南京大学;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 王武华;多模式CT评估缺血性卒中侧支循环对脑灌注状态的影响[D];福建医科大学;2015年

2 张卫涛;主动脉球囊(NeuroFlo)促进兔脑缺血模型侧支循环建立的实验研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年

3 杨娟;单侧颈动脉重度狭窄患者侧支循环与缺血性脑血管病的关系[D];宁夏医科大学;2015年

4 吴竹青;单侧颈内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者侧支循环与临床预后关系的研究[D];安徽医科大学;2015年

5 张聪;急性症状性颈动脉闭塞患者侧支循环的临床分析[D];青岛大学;2015年

6 贾帅;单侧颈内动脉颈段闭塞性脑梗死临床分析及侧支循环的DSA评价[D];青岛大学;2015年

7 潘昊君;颅内前后循环动脉粥样硬化性病变血管形态学与临床特征分析[D];吉林大学;2016年

8 张芬;脑血管侧支循环评价在脑动脉硬化性血管狭窄介入治疗中的应用研究[D];山东大学;2016年

9 张兆丰;大脑中动脉狭窄患者脑梗死与侧支循环的相关性研究[D];昆明医科大学;2016年

10 秦柱贵;症状性颅内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者侧支循环影响因素及其对临床预后的影响[D];广西医科大学;2017年



本文编号:2435982

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/shenjingyixue/2435982.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户40fed***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com