新型微创椎弓根钉-板固定系统的生物力学测试
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the biomechanical strength of a new minimally invasive pedicle screw-plate fixation system. Methods: according to the (ASTM) standard of the American Association of material testing, a single nail-bar test module was constructed, and the minimally invasive pedicle screw-plate was performed on a universal material testing machine. The biomechanical strength of unidirectional pedicle screw-rod and universal pedicle screw-rod assembly were measured. The test includes static lateral pressure test and fatigue test. Six sets of components were used to record the yield load, buckling stiffness and failure mode. The maximum stress values of 2.5 million cycles were recorded in fatigue test. Results: the yield load and buckling stiffness of minimally invasive pedicle screw plate assembly were significantly lower than that of unidirectional pedicle screw rod assembly (834.6 卤74.5 N vs 1087.7 卤59.0 N vs 218.1 卤22.4 N vs 300.0 卤14.9 Nu P0.001). There was no significant difference between the yield load of the minimally invasive pedicle screw plate assembly and that of the universal pedicle screw rod assembly (834.6 卤74.5 N vs 762.8 卤88.6 NV P0. 118), but the stiffness of the nail-plate assembly was significantly lower than that of the universal screw rod assembly (218.1 卤22.4N/mm vs 389.5 卤37.2 NmmP0.001). The failure mode of unidirectional pedicle screw-rod assembly is plastic deformation of the connecting rod, the failure of the universal pedicle screw-rod assembly is "ball socket coupling" structure, and the minimally invasive pedicle screw-plate assembly is the plastic deformation of titanium plate and the failure of nail-plate connection In 2.5 million dynamic lateral compression fatigue tests, the unidirectional pedicle screw-rod assembly, the minimally invasive pedicle screw-plate assembly and the universal pedicle screw-bar assembly were tested under 450 N and 350 N cyclic loads, respectively. Conclusion: the new minimally invasive pedicle screw plate fixation system can withstand 2.5 million times of 450N cyclic loading and has the characteristics of high yield load and low buckling stiffness.
【作者单位】: 第三军医大学附属新桥医院骨科;
【基金】:国家科技攻关计划(2012BAI14B00) 重庆市科委重大专项资助项目(CSTC2012gg_yyjs B10012)
【分类号】:R318.01;R687.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 孙宏慧,邹宏恩,沈万安,侯林,唐农轩,范清宇;经椎弓根内固定器械治疗腰椎滑脱症57例[J];第四军医大学学报;1999年12期
2 王洪,钟敏广,罗狄鑫;腰椎后外侧融合和BAK椎体间融合的疗效比较[J];骨与关节损伤杂志;2002年02期
3 刘涛;李长青;黄博;周跃;;一种改良椎弓根螺钉的设计和生物力学研究[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2010年11期
4 周跃;李杰;;腰椎椎弓根钉板内固定系统的发展与现状[J];第三军医大学学报;2015年01期
5 尹飚;权日;吴增晖;尹庆水;;Dynalok脊柱内固定系统治疗腰椎滑脱症[J];临床骨科杂志;2006年03期
6 周跃;王建;初同伟;李长青;郑文杰;郝勇;潘勇;张正丰;;内窥镜下单神经孔人路腰椎减压、植骨融合内固定术42例近期临床结果[J];中华外科杂志;2007年14期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王民选;双柱形髂骨块椎体间融合与SF固定治疗腰椎滑脱症[J];安徽医学;2002年06期
2 王家余;权良刚;刘舒;;DF加带骶棘肌蒂的髂骨瓣后外侧融合治疗腰椎滑脱症[J];安徽医药;2009年02期
3 庄科雄;张军;陈飞强;王波;祝晓聪;黄伟;周炳华;;胸腰段爆裂骨折钉棒系统内固定对恢复脊柱稳定性临床分析[J];中国医药导刊;2010年08期
4 王义清,王执民,张洪新,郭卫平,关彦,李文献;胶原酶溶解术治疗腰椎间盘突出症1600例[J];第四军医大学学报;2001年07期
5 于万胜,夏春,张英,林振宗,华强,傅日斌,赵慧毅;椎弓根内固定器治疗腰椎滑脱症[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2005年09期
6 杨劲松;陈志毅;谭俊铭;;后外侧植骨融合治疗腰椎管狭窄症长期疗效观察[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2005年12期
7 沈茂荣;杨渊;李鼎斌;梁伟国;余文君;韦文武;;Cage椎体融合器在腰椎手术中的应用[J];广西医学;2005年12期
8 付秀珍;椎弓根内固定系统治疗腰椎滑脱的护理[J];广州医药;2002年04期
9 孙韶华;刘观q,
本文编号:2236439
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/swyx/2236439.html