小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术与超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗老年白内障效果对比
本文选题:白内障 + 小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术 ; 参考:《中国老年学杂志》2017年14期
【摘要】:目的探讨不同术式在治疗老龄白内障患者的临床效果及并发症发生率差异。方法老龄白内障患者资料共304例,采用随机数字表法分成观察组各152例和对照组各152例,其中观察组行小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术,对照组行超声乳化白内障吸除术。比较两组术前术后眼压、视力恢复及并发症发生情况。结果两组术前眼压比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。术后2、6、12、24 h眼压比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后48 h两组眼压无统计学差异(P0.05)。两组术前视力比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。术后1 w观察组视力高于对照组(P0.05)。术后1、3个月两组视力无统计学差异(P0.05)。观察组并发症发生率显著少于对照组(P0.05)。结论两种术式对于白内障的治疗效果差异不明显。相比超声乳化白内障吸除术,小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术具有眼压升高缓慢、峰值低,术后视力恢复快以及并发症少等优势,更值得临床推广应用。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical effect and incidence of complications of different surgical procedures for senile cataract patients.Methods 304 patients with senile cataract were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n = 152) and the control group (n = 152). The observation group received non-phacoemulsification extracapsular extraction with small incision and the control group received phacoemulsification cataract extraction.Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity recovery and complications were compared between the two groups before and after operation.Results there was no significant difference in IOP between the two groups before operation (P 0.05).There was significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) within 24 hours after operation (P 0.05).There was no significant difference in IOP between the two groups at 48 h after operation (P 0.05).There was no significant difference in preoperative visual acuity between the two groups (P 0.05).The visual acuity of the observation group was higher than that of the control group at 1 week after operation (P 0.05).There was no significant difference in visual acuity between the two groups at 1 and 3 months after operation (P 0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P 0.05).Conclusion there is no significant difference between the two methods in the treatment of cataract.Compared with phacoemulsification extracapsular cataract extraction, small incision non-phacoemulsification extracapsular extraction has the advantages of slow elevation of intraocular pressure, low peak value, quick recovery of visual acuity and less complications, etc.
【作者单位】: 牡丹江医学院红旗医院;
【分类号】:R779.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 冯延琴;王理论;;两种小切口手术治疗高龄白内障60例对比分析[J];陕西医学杂志;2015年09期
2 刘铮;谭少健;刘金华;;白内障手术技术的研究进展[J];广西医科大学学报;2015年03期
3 卓楠;徐国兴;;白内障手术治疗的现状与展望[J];医学研究杂志;2015年01期
4 高烨;徐学东;徐柒华;;手法小切口硬核白内障手术的临床疗效观察[J];中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志;2014年06期
5 史素恩;王姝蕊;;168例白内障患者的流行病学及构成特点分析[J];中国医药导报;2014年22期
6 肖旗彬;周希瑗;马华峰;姚华;陶金豆;汤燕玲;;白内障患者的视功能及生存质量评价[J];重庆医科大学学报;2014年11期
7 马广民;闫素霞;田军涛;;手法小切口白内障手术200例临床分析[J];中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志;2014年05期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 宋秋颖;张增雷;;小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术与超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗老年白内障效果对比[J];中国老年学杂志;2017年14期
2 艾薇;;小切口摘除术与超声乳化应用于白内障治疗的效果分析[J];中国继续医学教育;2017年16期
3 黎源;;小切口囊外白内障摘除应用于老龄成熟期白内障贫困患者的疗效与安全性分析[J];中国现代医生;2017年16期
4 林瑞杰;黄玉银;刘贤金;陈俊杰;李文婷;;湛江市白内障复明手术视觉质量及社会因素调查[J];黑龙江医学;2017年05期
5 赵伟;姚勇;;过熟期年龄相关性白内障超声乳化手术治疗体会[J];临床眼科杂志;2017年02期
6 曹小川;;小切口非超声乳化白内障手术治疗硬核白内障的临床分析[J];中外医疗;2017年10期
7 崔丽s,
本文编号:1763721
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/wuguanyixuelunwen/1763721.html