不同频次肠道准备方法在肠镜检查中的多方面效果评估比较

发布时间：2018-01-18 15:51

本文关键词：不同频次肠道准备方法在肠镜检查中的多方面效果评估比较　出处：《中国内镜杂志》2016年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的探索不同的肠道准备频次在结肠镜检查中的清洁度评分、结肠息肉检出率和被检查者的主观感受的差异。方法收集2015年1月-2015年6月符合该研究的被检查者218例,随机分为3组;肠道准备的质量评估参照Boston肠道准备标准。等待检查期间行问卷调查了解被检查者的主观感觉,包括整体满意度和不适与进食情况、具体腹痛、腹胀等情况。结果肠道清洁度3组差异均有统计学意义,其中A组和C组之间差异有统计学意义。3组之间的息肉检出率差异无统计学意义,肠道准备的整体满意度、主观感受等方面3组之间差异无统计学意义。结论分次服用肠道准备用药在不影响被检查者主观体验的情况下可以提高肠道的清洁度,值得推荐。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the cleanliness score of different intestinal preparation frequency in colonoscopy. Methods from January 2015 to June 2015, 218 patients with colonic polyps were randomly divided into 3 groups. The quality assessment of intestinal preparation was based on the Boston gut preparation criteria. A questionnaire survey was conducted during the waiting period to find out the subjective feelings of the subjects, including overall satisfaction and discomfort and food intake, and specific abdominal pain. Results there were significant differences in intestinal cleanliness among three groups. There was no significant difference in polyp detection rate between group A and group C. There was no significant difference in the overall satisfaction and subjective feeling of intestinal preparation among the three groups. Conclusion taking the preparation medication in different doses can improve the cleanliness of the intestine without affecting the subjective experience of the examined patients. It is worth recommending.
【作者单位】：第二军医大学附属长征医院消化内科;上海天佑医院消化内科;第二军医附属长海医院影像科;
【分类号】：R574
【正文快照】： 结肠镜检查的准确性,尤其是息肉的检出率,与肠道准备的质量密切相关。肠道黏膜的清洁程度直接影响到检查的效果,这依靠事前充分的肠道准备工作[1]。不充分的肠道准备可能会遗漏黏膜的损伤、延长检查的时间、增加患者的痛苦以及增加并发症的发生率。尽管目前有大量的研究在寻求

【参考文献】