腹式呼吸联合生物反馈治疗功能性排便障碍的效果

发布时间：2018-02-16 08:05

本文关键词： 腹式呼吸联合生物反馈生物反馈功能性排便障碍　出处：《广东医学》2015年22期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的比较腹式呼吸联合生物反馈与生物反馈两种疗法干预功能性排便障碍的疗效差异。方法将46例诊断为功能性排便障碍患者,按照随机原则分为两组,分别为腹式呼吸联合生物反馈组24例,生物反馈组22例。腹式呼吸联合生物反馈组给予肛门直肠生物反馈训练,同时辅以腹式呼吸训练,生物反馈组仅做肛门直肠生物反馈训练。训练结束,比较两组患者治疗效果及患者对治疗的满意度。结果疗程结束后,两组患者治疗有效,Knowles-Eccersley-Scott(KESS)评分降低,VAS疗效满意度评分增加,腹式呼吸联合生物反馈组在排便不尽感及排便时间上与生物反馈组比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹式呼吸联合生物反馈与单纯生物反馈训练相比对改善功能性排便障碍疗效更明显。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the therapeutic effects of abdominal breathing combined with biofeedback and biofeedback on functional defecation disorder. Methods 46 patients with functional defecation disorder were divided into two groups according to the random principle. The abdominal breathing combined with biofeedback group (n = 24) and biofeedback group (n = 22) were treated with anorectal biofeedback training and abdominal breathing training. Only anorectal biofeedback training was done in the biofeedback group. After the training, the curative effect and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results after the course of treatment, the scores of effective Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-KESS decreased and the satisfaction score of VAS increased. Abdominal breathing combined with biofeedback group was compared with biofeedback group in defecation feeling and defecation time. Conclusion abdominal breathing combined with biofeedback is more effective in improving functional defecation disorder than that in simple biofeedback training.
【作者单位】：中山大学附属第六医院盆底中心;
【分类号】：R574.62

【相似文献】