结石性胆囊炎超声波穴位治疗与针刺治疗的比较观察

发布时间：2018-07-13 13:58

【摘要】：目的:观察结石性胆囊炎应用超声波穴位治疗与应用针刺治疗的疗效比较并探讨其实用价值。材料与方法:将符合纳入标准的结石性胆囊炎患者随机分入空白对照组、超声波穴位治疗组和针刺治疗组,三组均给予西医常规补液、抗炎及其他对症治疗,超声波穴位治疗组和针刺治疗组取相同穴位予以治疗。在治疗期间,对各组患者进行治疗前后临床症状评分、观察腹部阳性体征转阴时间、并监测患者外周血中C反应蛋白(C-Reactive Protein,CRP)的变化情况以及治疗后统计患者对于治疗方法的满意情况。结果:超声波穴位治疗组、针刺治疗组的临床症状评分、腹部阳性体征转阴时间及C反应蛋白情况均优于空白对照组,经统计学分析,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。超声波穴位治疗组、针刺治疗组的临床症状评分、腹部阳性体征转阴时间及C反应蛋白情况大致相同,两组间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。超声波穴位治疗组患者对治疗方法的满意率高于针刺组患者,经统计学分析,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:1.超声波穴位治疗、针刺治疗均可促进结石性胆囊炎患者的恢复。2.超声波穴位治疗与针刺治疗的疗效相当,超声波穴位治疗较针刺治疗总满意率高,具有良好的实用价值。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the effect of ultrasonic acupoint therapy and acupuncture therapy on calculous cholecystitis and to explore its practical value. Materials and methods: patients with gallstone cholecystitis were randomly divided into the control group, the ultrasonic acupoint treatment group and the acupuncture treatment group. The three groups were given routine western medicine fluid rehydration, anti-inflammatory and other symptomatic treatment. The same acupoints were taken for treatment in the ultrasonic acupoint treatment group and the acupuncture treatment group. During the course of treatment, the clinical symptoms of each group were evaluated before and after treatment, and the negative time of positive abdominal signs was observed. The changes of C-reactive protein (CRP) in peripheral blood and the satisfaction of the patients with the treatment were monitored. Results: the clinical symptom score, negative time of abdominal positive signs and C-reactive protein in ultrasonic acupoint treatment group and acupuncture treatment group were better than those in blank control group. The difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The clinical symptom score, the negative time of abdominal positive signs and C-reactive protein were similar in ultrasonic acupoint treatment group and acupuncture treatment group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). The satisfaction rate of supersonic acupoint treatment group was higher than that of acupuncture group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion 1. Ultrasonic acupoint therapy and acupuncture treatment can promote the recovery of cholecystitis. 2. 2. The curative effect of ultrasonic acupoint therapy and acupuncture treatment is equal, and the total satisfaction rate of ultrasonic acupoint therapy is higher than that of acupuncture treatment, which has good practical value.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁中医药大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：R575.61

【相似文献】