当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 消化疾病论文 >

不同添加时间、疗程及剂量益生菌根除幽门螺杆菌的临床疗效

发布时间:2018-08-15 18:03
【摘要】:目的 :探讨不同添加时间、疗程及剂量益生菌在根除幽门螺杆菌(helicobacter pylori,Hp)治疗中的临床疗效。方法:280例Hp阳性的患者随机分为5个治疗组:A组:兰索拉唑片30 mg+克拉霉素片500mg+阿莫西林胶囊1 000 mg,每日2次,疗程14 d;B组:双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片(2 000 mg,每日3次)服用14 d后,给予A组治疗方案治疗14 d,总疗程28 d;C_1组:A组治疗方案基础上加用双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片(2 000 mg,每日2次),疗程14 d;C_2组:A组治疗方案基础上加用双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片(2 000 mg,每日3次),疗程14 d;D组:C_2组方案根除治疗后,继续用双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌片(2 000 mg,每日3次)14 d,总疗程28 d。疗程结束4周后复查~(13)C尿素呼气试验评估根除疗效。治疗期间记录患者的不良反应发生情况。结果:252例(90.0%)患者按方案完成治疗,A、B、C_1、C_2、D组治疗完成率分别为78.6%(44/56)、92.9%(52/56)、87.5%(49/56)、96.4%(54/56)和94.6%(53/56),B、C_2及D组显著高于A组(P0.05),而C_2略高于B及D组,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。A、B、C_1、C_2及D组按意向治疗(ITT)根除率分别为62.5%、80.4%、69.6%、85.7%和87.5%,B、C_2及D组显著高于A组(χ~2=4.375,P=0.036;χ~2=7.864,P=0.005;χ~2=9.333,P=0.002),且C_2组高于C_1组(χ~2=4.171,P=0.041),而D组稍高于B组及C_2组,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05);按方案治疗(PP)五组根除率分别为79.5%、86.5%、79.6%、88.9%和92.5%,各组间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。不良反应包括恶心、腹胀、味觉异常(口苦、口腔异味)、厌食及便秘等。A、B、C_1、C_2及D组不良反应的发生率分别为67.9%(38/56)、26.8%(15/56)、35.7%(20/56)、21.4%(12/56)及17.9%(10/56),B、C_2及D组明显少于A组(P0.05),而B、C_2及D组各组间的差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:三联疗法联合双歧杆菌乳杆菌三联活菌能够显著降低传统根除疗法的胃肠道不良反应,提高患者依从性,从而提高患者Hp的根除率,且随着益生菌剂量的增加,Hp的根除率也随之增加,同时服用益生菌14 d为最佳选择。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinical efficacy of probiotics at different time, course and dose in the eradication of helicobacter pylorium-HP. Methods one hundred and twenty patients with HP positive were randomly divided into 5 groups: group A: lansoprazole 30 mg clarithromycin tablet 500mg amoxicillin capsule 1 000 mg twice a day. Group B was treated with bifidobacterium Lactobacillus triple live bacteria tablet (2 000 mg, 3 times a day) for 14 days. Group A was given the treatment regimen for 14 days, and the total course of treatment was 28 days. Group 1: group A was treated with bifidobacterium Lactobacillus triple live bacteria tablet (2 000 mg, twice a day) on the basis of the treatment plan of group 1: a, and bifidobacterium milk was added to the treatment plan of group C 2: a for 14 days. Three live bacilli tablets (2 000 mg, 3 times a day) for 14 days, group D, group 1: C, group C, group 2, after eradication treatment, Bifidobacterium Lactobacillus triplex live bacteria tablets (2 000 mg, 3 times a day) for 14 days, the total course of treatment was 28 days. The eradication effect was evaluated by ~ (13) C urea breath test after 4 weeks of treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded during treatment. Results among 252 patients (90.0%), the complete rate of treatment in group C was 78.6% (44 / 56) or 92.9% (5256), respectively, 87.5% (54 / 56) and 94.6% (53 / 56) of BC2 and group D were significantly higher than those of group A (P0.05), while the rate of C2C2 was slightly higher than that of group B and D. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). The eradication rates of (ITT) in group D and group C were 62.5 and 89.60.45%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in group A (蠂 2 4.375P0.036; 蠂 2 7.864 P 0.005; 蠂 2 9.333P 0.002), and in group C2 higher than those in group C1 (蠂 24.171P0. 041), while group D was slightly higher than those in group B and group C2, and in group D they were higher than those in group C (P < 0.05), but in group D were higher than those in group C (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between group C and group D (P 0.05). The eradication rate of (ITT) in group C was higher than that in group C 1 (P < 0.05), but that in group D was slightly higher than that in group C and group B (P 0.036; P 0.036; 蠂 2 9.333P 0.002). But the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05); the eradication rate of the five groups of (PP) was 79.5% and 92.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the five groups (P0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions including nausea, abdominal distension, abnormal taste (bitter mouth, mouth odour), anorexia and constipation were 67.9% (38 / 56), 26.8% (15 / 56) and 35.7% (20 / 56), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in group B and D was significantly lower than that in group A (P0.05). Conclusion: triple therapy combined with living bacteria of Lactobacillus bifidobacterium can significantly reduce gastrointestinal adverse reactions of traditional eradication therapy, improve compliance of patients, and thus improve the eradication rate of HP in patients. The eradication rate of HP increased with the increase of probiotic dose, and the best choice was to take probiotics for 14 days.
【作者单位】: 广东药学院附属第二医院(广州新海医院)消化内科;广东省医学科学院 广东省人民医院消化内科;
【基金】:广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(编号:A2016406)
【分类号】:R57

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 习羽;潘冬梅;;探讨丹参针剂辅助治疗急性水肿型胰腺炎患者的临床疗效[J];求医问药(下半月);2012年10期

2 廖茂杰;;应用中西医结合的方法治疗急性上消化道出血的临床疗效观察[J];求医问药(下半月);2013年06期

3 徐文进;中西医结合治疗脾虚型慢性溃疡性结肠炎98例的临床疗效观察[J];中国中西医结合脾胃杂志;1994年02期

4 韩丽芳;复肝康方剂的临床疗效观察[J];长治医学院学报;1997年01期

5 王剑;王继海;;76例慢性乙型病毒性肝炎中西医结合治疗体会[J];当代医学;2012年04期

6 李晓龙;杨柏建;;调脂护肝方配合西药治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病临床疗效观察[J];宁夏医学杂志;2013年06期

7 郑广华;;同化激素治疗溃疡病的临床疗效[J];国外医学参考资料(内科学分册);1976年08期

8 殷卫卫;腺苷蛋氨酸治疗病毒性淤胆型肝炎临床疗效观察[J];江苏医药;1999年06期

9 白勇刚;白智刚;;加味苏子降气汤联合西沙必利治疗46例便秘临床疗效观察[J];内蒙古中医药;2011年01期

10 张卓;;中西医结合治疗急性上消化道出血临床疗效观察[J];齐齐哈尔医学院学报;2012年18期

相关会议论文 前4条

1 田一梅;王宪波;李晶莹;张佳莹;郝新洁;姚鹏;李秀惠;;中西医结合治疗618慢性乙型重型肝炎临床疗效分析[A];全国第3届中西医结合传染病学术会议暨中国中西医结合学会传染病专业委员会第2届委员会议论文汇编[C];2010年

2 侯岩;张明香;李莉;崔丽萍;;中西医结合治疗肝硬化顽固性腹水的临床疗效观察[A];全国第4届中西医结合传染病学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年

3 温小凤;柯柳;;胆红素特异性吸附治疗肝炎高胆红素血症的临床疗效[A];第三届全国重型肝病及人工肝血液净化学术年会论文集(下册)[C];2007年

4 刘景泉;;中西医结合治疗功能消化不良41例临床疗效分析[A];中国中西医结合学会第十八次全国消化系统疾病学术会议暨2006年全国中西医结合消化系统疾病进展学习班论文汇编[C];2006年



本文编号:2184992

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/xiaohjib/2184992.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户22a51***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com