肝水解肽与肝水解肽联合丹参川穹嗪对青海地区肝硬化患者疗效的分析
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the efficacy of liver hydrolysate peptide and Danshen daizizine in the treatment of liver cirrhosis in Qinghai area, and to find out whether there is statistical significance between them. Methods: from May 2014 to February 2016, 30 patients with liver cirrhosis diagnosed and hospitalized in Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatology, affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University were selected as group A, and their sex, age, ethnicity and Child-Pugh grading were recorded as matched conditions. Thirty cirrhotic patients who met the inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria and matching conditions were selected as group B to ensure that only 100 mg of hepatic hydrolysate was given intravenously to group A and 30 cases of group A were strictly matched. Group B was treated with liver hydrolysate peptide 100mg and danshen dachonosin 10 ml once a day. The biochemical indexes of liver function were observed and recorded before, 10 days and 20 days after treatment. The data were inputted by SPSS 17.0 and analyzed statistically. Because the sample size was small (30 pairs), the difference value of matched sample was tested by normality, and the data was skewed from normal distribution. Therefore, the data was represented by median, quartile spacing, I. E. M, (QL-QU). The rank sum test was used in the comparison between groups, with a significant test level of 0.05. Results: after 10 days of treatment, the Z values of the five indexes by rank sum test were as follows: 1: ALT 1.214A AST 0.508U ALPU 1.080 GGT0.463CHE1 512P = 0. 225m AST 0.611ALT0.280GGT0.644CHE 0.131. Each index (P0.05). After 20 days of treatment, the Z values compared with the five indexes of rank sum test were as follows: 1 / ALT ~ (-2.220) AST ~ (-0.035) ~ (-2.494) ~ (-2.404) GGT-2.404 ~ (th) Chem -2.464 (P = 0. 026) and 0. 738% ALT ~ (0.013) GGT ~ (0.016) Chem 0.008, respectively. The GGTCHE index P0.05and AST P0.05. Conclusion: there was no significant difference between the two groups in the treatment of 60 patients with liver cirrhosis in Qinghai area after 10 days of treatment, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. After 20 days of treatment, four of the five indexes observed in the two groups were significantly different, the results were statistically significant, only one item of AST had no significant difference, but the results were not statistically significant.
【学位授予单位】:青海大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R575.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 林涛;王优;林爱俊;;肝水解肽治疗抗结核药物性肝损害疗效观察[J];临床肺科杂志;2008年02期
2 王灿;吴利红;史芳亮;邵泓;陈钢;;肝水解肽体外活性测定方法的探讨研究[J];药物分析杂志;2011年10期
3 林上炎;王灿;邵泓;陈钢;;肝水解肽体外生物学活性测定方法优化[J];中国医药工业杂志;2013年06期
4 李靓;;肝水解肽过敏1例[J];肝脏;2013年11期
5 杨玲;;肝水解肽注射液治疗新生儿高胆红素血症的疗效评价[J];中国社区医师(医学专业);2012年12期
6 王灿;吴利红;林上炎;邵泓;陈钢;;肝水解肽生物学活性测定方法的应用[J];中国药师;2013年05期
7 贺树卿;杜娟;;利福平联合肝水解肽治疗肺结核疗效观察[J];北方药学;2013年05期
8 李娜;赵亚松;;肝水解肽注射液致药物反应性高热三例[J];华北国防医药;2010年05期
9 宋国新;韦志强;;肝水的中药成方治疗窥探[J];北方药学;2013年07期
10 王广;吕高辉;沈新影;王英伟;;猪源、牛源肝水解肽的质量对比研究[J];中国生化药物杂志;2008年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 顾生旺;薛国良;蔡涛;厉芹;胡大山;初春;周建标;;升白蛋白胶囊与肝水解肽治疗肝硬化低白蛋白血症47例[A];第五届全国肝脏疾病临床暨中华肝脏病杂志成立十周年学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 董金超;肝水解肽与肝水解肽联合丹参川穹嗪对青海地区肝硬化患者疗效的分析[D];青海大学;2016年
2 周月乔;肝水解肽注射液的制备工艺优化及质量标准提高研究[D];安徽中医药大学;2013年
3 李慧梅;肝水解肽治疗肝硬化腹水的疗效观察[D];吉林大学;2007年
,本文编号:2248397
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/xiaohjib/2248397.html