当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 消化疾病论文 >

血浆microRNA检测在肝硬化早期诊断中的价值

发布时间:2019-07-03 12:48
【摘要】:研究背景:具有高敏感性和特异性的诊断指标对于肝硬化的诊断、病情进展的随访和治疗起着十分重要的作用。大量的研究表明循环中miRNA可作为许多疾病,包括慢性肝病的诊断指标。本研究的目的是对肝硬化患者血浆miRNA的表达水平进行检查,探讨血浆miRNA作为肝硬化无创诊断标志物的意义。实验方法:该研究为多阶段的病例对照研究,过程包括以下几部分:第一部分,为研究的筛选阶段(primary exploration phase),80个血浆样本(其中25个乙肝肝硬化、22个慢性肝炎和33个正常对照)处理后进行芯片全基因组miRNA表达检测。该芯片共包含有723个常见的miRNA。初筛结果经分析后,挑选出6个miRNA进行第二部分的验证工作。第二部分为研究的验证和建模阶段(trainning phase),首先,6个miRNA在41个样本中(20个乙肝肝硬化、9个慢性乙肝和12分正常对照)运用qPCR的方法进行验证,挑选出2个具有较高稳定性的miRNA,进一步在其余141个样本(70个乙肝肝硬化、23个慢性乙肝和48个正常对照)中运用qPCR的方法进行验证,结果应用Logistic回归进行整合。第三部分为诊断模型的验证阶段(validation phase),在第二部分得到的miRNA诊断模型在两个独立队列中分别进行验证,以保证该指标的稳定性。其中一个队列有44个样本,包括13个无临床表现的早期肝硬化、25个慢性肝炎和6个正常对照,所有样本都有肝穿病理结果明确诊断;另一个队列有92个样本,包括47个非乙肝肝硬化、7个非乙肝相关的慢性肝炎和38个正常对照。实验结果:1.通过全基因组miRNA表达芯片检测,6个miRNA (miR-106b、miR-122、 miR-144、miR-181d、miR-181b、和 miR-584)被挑选出来进行下一步qPCR的验证。3个miRNA(包括niR-106b、miR-122和 miR-144)在乙肝肝硬化患者中明显低于慢性乙型肝炎患者;而与正常对照相比,乙肝肝硬化病人血浆中miR-181d和miR-181b水平明显升高,miR-584的水平明显降低。2.验证阶段对6个miRNA进行验证,其中2个miRNA(miR-106b和miR-181b)具有较高的稳定性,乙肝肝硬化中miR-106b明显下调,而n miR-181b发上了明显的上调。3. miR-106b和miR-181b对乙肝肝硬化具有较高的诊断价值,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.715(95%CI,0.641-0.789;敏感性=0.804,特异性=0.522)和0.833(95%CI,0.775-0.892;敏感性=0.678,特异性=0.870)。4.对miR-106b和miR-181b进行整合建模建立肝硬化诊断模型:1.763×miR181b-14.622×miR106b-0.367。整合后miRNA诊断模型ROC曲线下面积为0.882(95%CI,0.834,0.929;敏感性=0.856,特异性=0.750),具有较高的诊断价值。5.在早期肝硬化组中对诊断模型进行进一步验证发现,miRNA诊断模型对早期肝硬化具有较高的诊断价值,ROC曲线下面积为0.774(95%CI,0.589-0.959;敏感性=0.615,特异性=0.935)。6. miRNA诊断模型与肝硬化的纤维增生相关,但与病因无关。非乙肝肝硬化组验证结果:ROC曲线下面积为0.915(95%CI,0.854-0.976;敏感性=0.787,特异性=0.932),说明该模型同样适用于其它类型的肝硬化的诊断。7. miR-106b和miR-181b与肝脏炎症程度无关,与其它临床指标,包括总胆红素、白蛋白、ALT、凝血酶原时问和国际标准化比值也无线性相。说明miR-106b和miR-181b为纤维形成特异性的指标,与肝脏炎症程度、肝功能和肝细胞损害无直接相关。结论:我们的研究发现miR-106b和miR-181b可对临床肝硬化的患者有较高的诊断价值,特别适用于诊断早期肝硬化的患者。
[Abstract]:Background: The diagnostic index with high sensitivity and specificity plays an important role in the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis and the follow-up and treatment of disease progression. A large number of studies have shown that miRNAs in the cycle can be used as a diagnostic index for many diseases, including chronic liver disease. The purpose of this study was to check the expression level of plasma miRNA in patients with liver cirrhosis and to study the significance of plasma miRNA as a non-invasive diagnostic marker of liver cirrhosis. experimental method: the study is a multi-stage case-control study, including the following parts: first part, The whole-genome miRNA expression was tested after treatment with primary expression phase,80 plasma samples (25 of which were hepatitis B cirrhosis,22 chronic hepatitis, and 33 normal controls). The chip contains 723 common miRNAs. After the results of the primary screen were analyzed, the validation of the second part of the six miRNAs was selected. The second part was the validation and modeling phase of the study. First, six miRNAs were tested by qPCR in 41 samples (20 hepatitis B cirrhosis,9 chronic hepatitis B and 12 normal controls) and two miRNAs with higher stability were selected. The results were verified by using qPCR in the remaining 141 samples (70 hepatitis B liver cirrhosis,23 chronic hepatitis B and 48 normal controls). The third part is the validation phase of the diagnostic model, and the miRNA diagnosis model obtained in the second part is respectively verified in two independent queues to ensure the stability of the index. One of the cohort had 44 samples, including 13 early cirrhosis with no clinical manifestations,25 chronic hepatitis and 6 normal controls, all of which had a clear diagnosis of the pathological findings of the liver, and 92 samples in the other cohort, Including 47 non-hepatitis B cirrhosis,7 non-hepatitis B-related chronic hepatitis and 38 normal controls. Experimental results:1. Six miRNAs (miR-106b, miR-122, miR-144, miR-181d, miR-181b, and miR-584) were selected for the next qPCR validation by full-genome miRNA expression chip detection. Three miRNAs (including niR-106b, miR-122, and miR-144) were significantly lower in patients with hepatitis B liver cirrhosis than in patients with chronic hepatitis B; and compared to normal controls, The levels of miR-181d and miR-181b in the plasma of patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis were significantly increased, and the level of miR-584 was significantly reduced. In the validation phase,6 miRNAs were validated, of which 2 miRNAs (miR-106b and miR-181b) had higher stability, and miR-106b was significantly down-regulated in hepatitis B liver cirrhosis, while n-miR-181b was significantly up-regulated. The diagnostic value of miR-106b and miR-181b for hepatitis B liver cirrhosis was 0.715 (95% CI, 0.641-0.789; sensitivity = 0.804, specificity = 0.522) and 0.833 (95% CI, 0.775-0.892; sensitivity = 0.678, specificity = 0.870). Whole-time modeling of miR-106b and miR-181b was performed to establish a liver cirrhosis diagnosis model: 1.763-miR181b-14.622-miR106b-0.367. The area of the ROC curve was 0.882 (95% CI, 0.834, 0.929; sensitivity = 0.856, specificity = 0.750), with high diagnostic value. Further validation of the diagnostic model in the early cirrhosis group found that the miRNA diagnostic model had a high diagnostic value for early cirrhosis and the area under the ROC curve was 0.774 (95% CI, 0.589-0.959; sensitivity = 0.615, specificity = 0.935). The miRNA diagnosis model is related to the fibroplasia of the liver cirrhosis, but is not related to the cause of the liver cirrhosis. The results of the non-hepatitis B liver cirrhosis group showed that the area under the ROC curve was 0.915 (95% CI, 0.854-0.976; sensitivity = 0.787, specificity = 0.932), indicating that the model was also applicable to the diagnosis of other types of liver cirrhosis. The miR-106b and miR-181b are not related to the degree of inflammation of the liver, and have no linear phase with other clinical indicators, including total bilirubin, albumin, ALT, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio. It is indicated that miR-106b and miR-181b are specific indicators for fiber formation, and are not directly related to the degree of liver inflammation, liver function and liver cell damage. Conclusion: Our study found that miR-106b and miR-181b can have high diagnostic value for patients with cirrhosis, and is especially suitable for patients with early cirrhosis.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R575.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈秋梅;张敏强;;认知诊断模型发展及其应用方法述评[J];心理科学进展;2010年03期

2 胡永瑜;观测和设计诊断模型的简易方法[J];国外医学参考资料.口腔医学分册;1978年06期

3 杨涛;吴承玉;;基于人工神经网络的心系基础证诊断模型构建[J];中国中医基础医学杂志;2013年09期

4 江启煜;孙晓生;;试论“辨证元”计量诊断模型的基础[J];广州中医药大学学报;2010年02期

5 郭磊;苑春永;边玉芳;;从新模型视角探讨认知诊断的发展趋势[J];心理科学进展;2013年12期

6 周攀;丁银环;何鹏;吴鹏强;刘文军;王开正;;特发性血小板减少性紫癜血小板差异蛋白质组诊断模型的实验研究[J];中国实验血液学杂志;2013年01期

7 龚丽云;张震宇;郑燕华;张建中;;血清蛋白指纹图谱用于建立妊娠期高血压疾病诊断模型的研究[J];中华妇产科杂志;2007年12期

8 谢松喜;陈明;黄玉娟;陈剑光;胡晓;吴一龙;;非小细胞肺癌脑转移脑脊液蛋白质谱诊断模型的建立及其应用[J];中华肿瘤防治杂志;2009年20期

9 王士杰;张立玮;于卫芳;余捷凯;郑树;李英赛;尔丽绵;温登瑰;高金宏;徐志彬;;高发区筛查人群食管鳞癌血清蛋白指纹图谱诊断模型的建立及临床价值[J];中华肿瘤杂志;2007年06期

10 李蓉;孙媛;;机器学习技术在胸癌诊断中的应用[J];科学技术与工程;2011年20期

相关会议论文 前4条

1 刘文;边玉芳;陈玲丽;;题组认知诊断方法模拟研究[A];增强心理学服务社会的意识和功能——中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨第十四届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2011年

2 张辉;孔北华;;卵巢癌患者血清差异表达蛋白诊断模型的研究[A];中华医学会第九次全国妇科肿瘤学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年

3 宋丽红;汪文义;戴海琦;丁树良;;基于贝叶斯网的认知诊断模型构建[A];心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议论文集[C];2013年

4 邱福铭;黄建;陈益定;余捷凯;;胃癌血清蛋白质质谱诊断模型的建立与评价[A];中国蛋白质组学第三届学术大会论文摘要[C];2005年

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 陈妍洁;血浆microRNA检测在肝硬化早期诊断中的价值[D];复旦大学;2014年

2 何虹;口腔鳞状上皮细胞癌组织和患者血清、唾液蛋白质组学诊断模型的建立[D];浙江大学;2008年

3 万霞;死因推断量表肿瘤诊断模型的研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前8条

1 李旎;关于三值社会诊断模型的研究[D];湘潭大学;2009年

2 霍菲;初中数学个性化诊断模型研发的初步探讨[D];上海师范大学;2012年

3 周攀;原发免疫性血小板减少性紫癜血小板蛋白组学诊断模型的研究[D];泸州医学院;2013年

4 玄超;应用表面增强激光解析电离飞行时间质谱技术筛选鼻咽癌血清生物标志物及建立诊断模型的研究[D];广西医科大学;2009年

5 唐悦清;原发性醛固酮增多症模糊数学诊断模型的研究[D];山东大学;2006年

6 王泽和;基于人体测量学构建非体力劳动者NAFLD诊断模型及相关指标切点值的探讨[D];广东药学院;2013年

7 王晓丽;基于近红外光谱技术的水稻叶部病害诊断模型构建[D];中国农业科学院;2011年

8 郑慧禹;食管癌血清蛋白质谱结合人工神经网络诊断模型建立的应用研究[D];泸州医学院;2009年



本文编号:2509398

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/xiaohjib/2509398.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户db214***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com