不同预处理方法对金属器械清洗效果的观察
发布时间:2018-04-11 21:49
本文选题:预处理 + 金属器械 ; 参考:《世界最新医学信息文摘》2016年78期
【摘要】:目的探究不同预处理方法对金属器械的清洗效果,以提高医疗器械的清洗质量。方法选取2014年7月至10月我院妇科人流包27件金属器械作为实验器材,将6套手术器械随机分为A、B、C三组,各2套,每套累计清洗10次,每组共计样本540件,A组采用老肯LK/CSJ型超声清洗机对器械予以预处理,B组通过全自动清洗机对器械予以预处理,C组采用手工法对器械予以预处理,对比三组的清洗质量及器械的生锈情况。结果 A组生锈率及清洗检测合格率分别为0.2%、99.8%,B组分别为0.6%、93.9%,C组分别为1.1%、88.9%,A组生锈率及清洗检测合格率均明显优于B、C两组,且A组与C组相比较差异显著(P0.05);A组对于难清洗部位的清洁效果明显优于B、C两组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论采用超声清洗机对器械进行预处理,可对难清洗部位予以有效清洁,延长器械的使用寿命,降低清洗工作的工作压力,应用价值更加显著。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the cleaning effect of different pretreatment methods on metal instruments in order to improve the cleaning quality of medical instruments.Methods from July to October 2014, 27 metal instruments of gynecological abortion were selected as experimental instruments. Six sets of surgical instruments were randomly divided into three groups, two sets each, each with a total of 10 cleaning times.A total of 540 samples were collected in each group. Group A used Laoken LK/CSJ ultrasonic cleaning machine to pretreat the instruments. Group B used automatic cleaning machine to pretreat the instruments. Group C used manual method to pretreat the instruments.The cleaning quality of the three groups and the rusting of the instruments were compared.Results the rusting rate and the qualified rate of cleaning test in group A were 0.2and 99.8and group B were 0.60.93.9and group C were 1.1% and 88.9% respectively. The rate of rusting and the qualified rate of cleaning detection in group A were significantly better than those in group B and group B, respectively.The cleaning effect of group A was better than that of group B (P 0.05), and the difference between group A and group C was significantly higher than that of group A (P 0.05), and the cleaning effect of group A was significantly better than that of group B (P 0.05).Conclusion Pretreatment with ultrasonic cleaning machine can effectively clean the difficult parts, prolong the service life of the instruments and reduce the working pressure of the cleaning work. The application value is more significant.
【作者单位】: 河南省沁阳市第二人民医院供应室;
【分类号】:R187
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 李子珠;;两种浸泡方法对金属器械的防腐比较[J];中国消毒学杂志;2008年05期
2 罗秀玲;曾科思;龚小英;丁金荣;邓忠慧;;应用石蜡油处理新金属器械的清洁效果评价[J];实用心脑肺血管病杂志;2009年01期
3 陈卫;倪小茗;李卫萍;;管腔类金属器械不同清洗方法的效果分析[J];解放军护理杂志;2011年24期
4 刘爱玲,宋黎明,王桂芸;三效灭活剂用于金属器械浸泡的效果评价[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2003年01期
5 黎小梅;幸敏;;失效模式与效应分析法在管腔类金属器械清洗中的应用[J];中国临床护理;2012年01期
6 王洪梅;杜丽萍;王新华;彭华;崔永志;;管腔类金属器械清洗方法的改进[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2006年09期
7 姜华,王继梅,卢惠琳,袁柏强;微波联合氯己定用于金属器械快速灭菌的实验研究[J];护理学杂志;2005年02期
8 陈,
本文编号:1737809
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yufangyixuelunwen/1737809.html