既往戒烟次数相关影响因素的研究
[Abstract]:Background tobacco use seriously endangering the health of the population, bringing a heavy economic burden to the human society, has become an urgent problem of public health in the world. In many countries suffering from tobacco damage, our country is particularly injured, which is closely related to the high production and high consumption level of China's tobacco. In addition, The country has a large population in rural areas. Compared with the urban residents, the smoking rate of the rural population is higher and the amount of smoking is more. Therefore, it is of great significance to control the tobacco epidemic and promote the health of the population by making practical tobacco control strategies and measures aimed at the rural areas in China. The most direct, most economical means is to promote smokers to quit smoking successfully. The success of smokers is affected by many factors, such as smoking cessation, self-efficacy, tobacco hazard cognition, daily smoking, the number of smokers around, and the past smoking cessation experience is one of the most important factors. There is a dispute over the study of the relationship between smoking cessation success. There are studies that people who have had the experience of smoking cessation are more willing to give up smoking in the future and are more likely to try again. The result of the study is that successful quitting smokers usually give up smoking or success, while smokers who have tried many times but still fail to succeed, that is, the more the number of quitting smoking is not easy to succeed. On the basis of the relationship between the number of smokers and the success of smoking cessation, the influence factors of the number of smoking cessation in the past are discussed in order to provide effective theoretical guidance for the future development of smoking control strategies and measures in accordance with the objective reality. Purpose 1. to explore the influence of the number of smoking cessation and the success of smoking cessation on the influence of the number of smoking cessation in the present smokers. Based on the cohort of the Shandong University health research base, this study was established in the 3 counties of Junan, Linyi, Jining, Liangshan and Pingyin, Ji'nan, 2009, where 3 natural villages were selected from each county in the 3 counties of Junan, Jining, Liangshan and Ji'nan. The tobacco exposure questionnaire for rural residents was used for 15 years in 9 natural villages. Questionnaire survey was conducted to exclude people who had not been living for more than 3 months due to work or other reasons. The contents of the questionnaire mainly included the general demographic characteristics of the subjects, the status of tobacco use, the situation of smoking cessation, the attitude to smoking and the cognition of tobacco danger. The subjects were divided into young people (less than 45 years old), middle-aged (45 to 59 years old) and older (more than 60 years old); the marital status was divided into married and other two types; the cultural level was divided into lower, middle and higher levels, representing primary and junior high school, high school and above, respectively; The occupational types were divided into two categories of farming and other types. The number of years of smoking package was defined as the number of /20 branches per day and the number of years of smoking; the reasons for smoking cessation were divided into illness or worry and other reasons; the attitude of smoking and the cognition of smoking hazards were treated, the scores of each item were gained and the total score of the risk of danger was obtained, and the total score was carried out by the method of three quantiles. In the study of the influencing factors of the number of smoking cessation, the number of smokers who had never given up smoking was defined as 0, and the influence factors of smoking cessation were included in the analysis. The number of smoking cessation and smoking cessation were discussed by the multi factor Logistic model. Successful relationship; use the tendency score value as the covariate in the logistic regression model to adjust age, marital status, education, career type, smoking age, and cause of smoking cessation as potential confounding factors; use the Hurdle counting model to explore the influence factors of the number of smoking abstinence. Study results 1. the success and loss of smoking cessation. The differences in age groups, years of smoking, smoking years, smoking, smoking, smoking, and smoking cessation were statistically significant (P0.05), but there was no significant difference in marital status, educational level, occupational type and smoking age..2.Logistic regression results showed that the adjustment of confounding factors Age, educational level, occupation type, marital status, smoking age and smoking cessation cause, the number of previous smoking cessation was significantly negatively correlated with the success of smoking cessation (OR=0.417,95%CI=0.343-0.506) the two groups were divided into age groups, years of smoking, year of smoking, marital status, attitude and attitude towards smoking, compared with those who had never quit smoking. The differences in smoking hazard cognition are statistically significant (P0.05), but there is no significant difference in the level of education, occupation type, smoking age, and daily smoking. The results of.4.Hurdle count model are divided into two parts.Logistic part results show that the main factors affecting whether smokers have ever quit smoking are mainly married. Marital status (married vs., beta =0.540, P= 0.004), educational level (beta =0.195, P=0.040) and smoking hazard cognitive level (beta =0.238, P=0.009). Zero truncated Poisson regression section showed that people who started smoking at least 20 years of age at least once were smoking cessation times before the age of 20. (beta =0.202, P=0.010), the cognitive level of smoking hazards (beta =0.141, P= 0.024) was positively correlated with the number of previous smoking cessation. Conclusion 1. the more the number of smoking cessation, the lower the likelihood of successful smoking cessation, the more the factors affecting the number of previous smoking cessation in the past, the factors affecting the past two processes of smoking cessation and smoking cessation are not exactly the same. The marital status, The degree of culture and the degree of cognition of tobacco harm are the main factors that affect the smoking cessation, and the age of smoking and the cognitive level of tobacco harm are mainly related to the number of previous smoking cessation. In the future work, we should correct the wrong knowledge of smoking cessation, encourage smokers to try to quit smoking, and should promote smoking cessation to prevent relapse from smoking. To succeed in smoking cessation.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R163
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭普远;;多视角看影响中国人寿命的主要因素[J];中国老年保健医学;2008年04期
2 陈艳艳;尹忠贵;;近视发生发展影响因素的研究进展(续)[J];中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志;2013年04期
3 杜玉开,刘筱娴;妇女意外伤害的影响因素及预防对策[J];国外医学(社会医学分册);2000年04期
4 徐晓莉,戴萌,吴雁鸣,徐晓建;影响医学人才科技创新相关因素初探[J];中国医院管理;2003年07期
5 尹宗杰,戴红;我国社区居民康复服务需求的影响因素初探[J];中国全科医学;2005年07期
6 马芳;朱丹;;护理本科生关爱能力影响因素调查分析[J];护理研究;2007年03期
7 王常宇;李燕梅;;社区居民参与的问题与对策[J];科技资讯;2007年02期
8 马静;徐勇;;苏州市15家重大危险源企业职业安全行为的影响因素[J];环境与职业医学;2007年03期
9 穆玲;;教师幸福感的影响因素及提升途径[J];卫生职业教育;2008年01期
10 张书昌;郭应虎;;浅淡医院执行力的影响因素[J];现代医院管理;2008年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 于海峰;张向葵;;国内外关于身体自尊的研究[A];第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2005年
2 程秋生;李建丹;程建华;;老年性皮肤瘙痒症患者的心理状况及影响因素的分析[A];中华医学会第十二次全国皮肤性病学术会议论文集[C];2006年
3 王渭玲;;大学生在生活中的暴力接触及影响因素研究[A];增强心理学服务社会的意识和功能——中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨第十四届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2011年
4 宁式颖;郑璐;李响;惠文佳;;青少年抑郁现状及影响因素的调查研究[A];第七届全国心理卫生学术大会论文汇编[C];2014年
5 范巍;王重鸣;;个体创业倾向影响因素研究[A];第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2005年
6 张腾;;铁路青年创新能力主观影响因素研究[A];提高全民科学素质、建设创新型国家——2006中国科协年会论文集[C];2006年
7 青春;高兴;;半个世纪以来内蒙古自治区速度赛马成绩及影响因素的分析[A];第九届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(2)[C];2011年
8 李洪_";周代全;黎川;;数字化X线摄影床旁照片体会[A];2009中华医学会影像技术分会第十七次全国学术大会论文集[C];2009年
9 王晓凌;沈萌;邱君;;河南省农户秸秆综合利用行为影响因素研究[A];农业经济问题(2009年增刊)[C];2009年
10 马文杰;冯中朝;;湖北2004年度水稻生产影响因素实证分析[A];湖北省人民政府第三届湖北科技论坛“三农问题与农业综合生产能力提高”分论坛论文集[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 兴业期货高级研究员 施海;影响因素错综复杂商品外弱内强[N];第一财经日报;2013年
2 山西山煤宁武晋海洗煤有限公司 赵云鹏;企业创新能力影响因素探究[N];山西科技报;2014年
3 本报记者 曹乘瑜;政策是医药股最大影响因素[N];中国证券报;2013年
4 本报特约分析师 张春良;影响因素不一 麦价“内稳外弱”[N];粮油市场报;2013年
5 记者 曲德辉;下半年信贷投放存在两方面影响因素[N];期货日报;2009年
6 郝前进 王淼薇 复旦大学国土资源经济研究中心;企业生存发展及其影响因素[N];中国社会科学报;2012年
7 国家兔产业技术体系营养与饲料研究室主任 河北农业大学动物科技学院二级教授 谷子林;獭兔行情的影响因素及应对措施[N];河北科技报;2013年
8 李海辉 中国人民银行营业管理部;利率曲线:影响因素与改革方向[N];中国经济时报;2014年
9 通讯员 刘依;2009中国汽车市场影响因素研讨会召开[N];中国石油报;2008年
10 中宏形势跟踪课题组;经济增长要考虑更多交互影响因素[N];上海证券报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 王养忠;糖尿病视网膜病变发展影响因素及进展预测模型临床研究[D];北京中医药大学;2016年
2 杨志兵;误导信息特点分析及其传播意愿影响因素的研究[D];第四军医大学;2016年
3 金家华;社会化问答社区中用户知识行为的影响因素研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2015年
4 董开栋;手机新闻的使用及影响因素研究[D];上海交通大学;2015年
5 叶磊;组织信息化过程中个体满意度影响因素研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2008年
6 申洪源;中国城市劳动生产率的影响因素研究[D];西南交通大学;2014年
7 聂鑫;农地城市流转中失地农民多维福利影响因素和测度研究[D];华中农业大学;2011年
8 芦鹏宇;基于自动议价系统的议价结果影响因素研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2007年
9 吕一博;中小企业成长的影响因素研究[D];大连理工大学;2008年
10 张骏;用户接受网上银行影响因素及管理策略研究[D];中国矿业大学(北京);2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李兰平;本科生工程领导力影响因素及提升对策研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年
2 徐姗;微信公众号用户采纳与使用影响因素研究[D];西南大学;2015年
3 刘旭红;农民进城购房意愿的影响因素研究[D];西南大学;2015年
4 耿美琼;高中生英语学习兴趣的影响因素研究[D];宁夏师范学院;2015年
5 徐荣荣;高中英语课堂学生沉默影响因素的调查研究[D];河北师范大学;2015年
6 陈梦阳;大学生信用感的现状、影响因素及其培养[D];上海师范大学;2015年
7 杨岩峰;高中生学习倦怠及其影响因素的研究[D];上海师范大学;2015年
8 虞亚君;大学生奉献感的现状、影响因素及其培养的实证研究[D];上海师范大学;2015年
9 于伟红;环首都经济圈外来人口影响因素研究[D];河北师范大学;2015年
10 王阳;河北省校园足球活动的开展现状和影响因素分析[D];河北师范大学;2015年
,本文编号:2163001
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yufangyixuelunwen/2163001.html