Alberta婴儿运动量表与Gesell发育量表在高危儿运动评估中的一致性

发布时间：2018-08-18 15:55

【摘要】：目的探讨Alberta婴儿运动量表(AIMS)与Gesell发育量表在高危儿运动功能评估中的一致性及AIMS在评估高危儿运动功能中的应用价值。方法 2~8个月的116例高危儿均接受AIMS与Gesell发育量表评估,其中足月儿56例,早产儿60例。对AIMS百分位与Gesell发育量表大运动发育商的一致性效度分析采用Kappa值,并分别计算足月高危儿AIMS百分位与Gesell发育量表大运动发育商一致性效度及早产高危儿AIMS百分位与Gesell发育量表大运动发育商的一致性效度。结果 116例高危儿AIMS百分位与Gesell发育量表大运动发育商的一致性为0.62,其中在足月高危儿及早产高危儿的一致性效度分别为0.66及0.53。结论 AIMS在高危儿粗大运动功能评估中与Gesell发育量表有较高的一致性,应用AIMS还可以更早地发现运动发育迟缓及运动发育异常。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the consistency of Alberta infant motor scale (AIMS) and Gesell development scale (Gesell) in the evaluation of motor function of high-risk infants and the application value of AIMS in the evaluation of motor function of high-risk infants. Methods from 2 to 8 months, 116 high-risk infants were assessed with AIMS and Gesell development scale, including 56 term infants and 60 premature infants. Kappa was used to analyze the consistency validity of AIMS percentile and large motor development quotient in Gesell development scale. The conformance validity of AIMS percentile and Gesell developmental quotient and AIMS percentile and Gesell development quotient were calculated respectively. Results the concordance of AIMS percentile and large motor development quotient of Gesell development scale was 0.62, and the consistency validity in term high-risk infants and preterm high-risk infants were 0.66 and 0.53, respectively. Conclusion AIMS is consistent with Gesell development scale in the evaluation of gross motor function of high risk infants. AIMS can also be used to detect motor retardation and abnormal motor growth earlier.
【作者单位】：广州市妇女儿童医疗中心神经康复科;
【分类号】：R174

【相似文献】