当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 预防医学论文 >

重庆市计划妊娠人群健康现状及风险因素分析

发布时间:2019-06-11 09:32
【摘要】:目的:调查重庆市计划妊娠人群的健康现状,分析该类人群的健康状况在不同的年龄段、文化程度、职业、民族等等之间的分布,依照孕前优生健康检查风险评估标准对计划妊娠人群进行评估分类,探讨风险人群的影响因素,为改善重庆市计划妊娠人群的健康状况提供科学依据,促进优生优育。方法:本研究按地区分层依照每个地区计划妊娠人口的比例进行多阶段整群随机抽样。在全市40个区县抽取符合生育政策的共10786人即5393对计划妊娠夫妇进行问卷调查和相关的体格检查。调查计划妊娠人群的人口社会学特征、既往疾病史、孕育史、家族史、不良生活习惯、环境有毒有害物质接触史、社会心理压力因素并进行健康体检。回收有效问卷9384份,回收率为87%。采用Epi Data3.2统计软件建立数据库,用双录的方式录入数据,按照孕前优生风险评估标准对计划妊娠人群进行分类,并依此划分为一般人群和风险人群。用SPSS17.0统计软件对样本资料进行统计学分析,用现况调查的方法进行研究,计数资料用率、构成比进行描述,对相关因素与风险人群的关系进行卡方检验。对可能影响计划妊娠人群的健康风险因素采用多因素非条件Logistic回归分析。结果1.重庆市9384名即4692对计划妊娠夫妇中,男性参检人群中风险人群占5.86%,一般人群占比94.14%;女性参检人群中风险人群占28.64%,一般人群占比71.36%;风险人群比例较低;2.经单因素分析,检出男性风险人群的危险因素有年龄(χ2=14.5723,P=0.0001)、地区(χ2=31.5502,P0.0001)、乙肝疾病史(χ2=60.9689,P0.0001)、乙肝疫苗接种史(χ2=12.6811,P=0.0004)、体重指数异常(χ2=6.5551,P=0.0377)、血压异常(χ2=6.1461,P=0.0132)、HBs Ab(χ2=842.0512,P0.0001);经多因素logistic回归分析,有统计学意义的结果中:乙肝疾病史(OR=6.587)、BMI≥24.00(OR=1.577)、高血压(OR=1.836)是男性风险人群的危险因素;而20≤年龄35(OR=0.613)、渝东南生态保护区相对于都市功能核心区(OR=0.434)、乙肝疫苗接种史(OR=0.608),HBs Ab阳性(OR=0.383)是男性风险人群的保护因素。3.经单因素分析,检出女性风险人群相关的危险因素有地区(χ2=45.4756,P0.0001)、民族(χ2=5.8426,P=0.0156)、文化程度(χ2=94.9953,P0.0001)、职业(χ2=25.4574,P=0.0004)、乙肝疾病史(χ2=6.0067,P=0.0143)、风疹疫苗接种史(χ2=8.2669,P=0.0040)、生活/工作压力(χ2=11.6018,P=0.0007)、经济压力(χ2=12.9845,P=0.0003)。经多因素logistic回归分析,有统计学意义的结果中:地区中城市发展新区(OR=1.641)、渝东北生态涵养发展区(OR=1.65)、渝东南生态保护区(OR=2.028)相对于都市功能核心区、乙肝疾病史是女性风险人群的危险因素;而文化程度中高中(OR=0.114)和大学(OR=0.371)相对于小学及以下、工人相对于农民(OR=0.656)、风疹疫苗接种(OR=0.686)是女性风险人群的保护因素。结论本研究通过分析重庆市9384名(4692对夫妇)计划妊娠人群健康现状和风险研究,分别从社会人口学特征、体格检查、实验室检查情况分析,并依照风险因素进行分类,对相关风险因素进行统计学分析。得出如下结论:1.本文通过健康检查、风险评估,结果显示,重庆市计划妊娠人群总体健康状况较好,风险人群所占比例较低;2.重庆市计划妊娠人群中,风险人群中女性比男性比例高,应加强对女性计划妊娠人群的孕前保健工作,引导女性增强优生优育意识,增加医疗保健服务的利用率;3.乙型肝炎疾病史、肥胖、高血压是男性风险人群的主要危险因素。适龄生育、适宜环境和乙肝表面抗体阳性是男性风险人群的保护因素。应对男性加强宣传教育,加强男性计划妊娠人群的健康管理,避免危险因素;4.女性风险人群的危险因素是乙型肝炎疾病史、地区经济水平落后、职业暴露。保护因素是文化程度高、职业暴露少和接种风疹疫苗。应积极提高女性的受教育程度,增强女性的自我保健意识,提高自我保护能力。
[Abstract]:Objective: To investigate the health status of the pregnant population in Chongqing, and to analyze the distribution of the health status of the population in different age groups, the degree of culture, the occupation, the nationality and so on. To explore the influencing factors of the risk population, to provide the scientific basis for improving the health status of the pregnant women in Chongqing, and to promote the good and healthy development. Methods: A multi-stage cluster random sampling was conducted according to the proportion of the pregnant population in each district according to the regional stratification. A total of 107,86 persons,5393, who were in line with the reproductive policy in 40 districts of the city, were investigated and the relevant physical examination was conducted. The demographic and social characteristics of the pregnant population of the planned pregnancy, the history of previous diseases, the history of inoculation, the family history, the bad living habits, the contact history of the toxic and harmful substances in the environment, the factors of social stress and the physical examination of the health were investigated. The effective rate of recovery was 9384 and the recovery rate was 87%. The database was established by using Epi Data3.2 statistical software, and the data were recorded in a two-record manner. The planned pregnancy population was classified according to the pre-pregnancy risk assessment standard and classified into the general population and the risk group. The statistical analysis of the sample data was carried out by using the SPSS17.0 statistical software, and the method of current status investigation was used to study the data rate and the composition ratio, and the relationship between the related factors and the risk population was chi-square test. A multi-factor, non-conditional logistic regression analysis was used for the health risk factors that might affect the planned pregnancy population. Results 1. Of the 9384 pregnant couples in Chongqing, the risk group was 5.86%, the general population was 94.14%, the risk group was 28.64%, the general population was 71.36%, and the proportion of the risk group was lower. The risk factors of the male risk group were analyzed by single factor analysis. The risk factors of the male risk group were age (2 = 14.5723, P = 0.0001), the history of hepatitis B (2 = 60.9689, P.0001), the history of hepatitis B vaccine (2 = 12.6811, P = 0.0004), the body weight index was abnormal (Sup2 = 6.5551, P = 0.0377), and the blood pressure was abnormal (Sup2 = 6.1461, P = 0.0132). The history of hepatitis B disease (OR = 6.587), BMI of 24.00 (OR = 1.577) and high blood pressure (OR = 1.836) were the risk factors of the male risk group, and 20% of age 35 (OR = 0.613). Compared with the core area of urban function (OR = 0.434), the history of hepatitis B vaccination (OR = 0.608), the positive of HBs Ab (OR = 0.383) was the protection factor of the male risk group. The risk factors associated with the women's risk groups were analyzed by single factor analysis (2 = 45.4756, P = 0.0156), nationality (Sup2 = 5.8426, P = 0.0156), degree of culture (Sup2 = 94.9953, P.0001), occupation (Sup2 = 25.4574, P = 0.0004), history of hepatitis B (2 = 6.0067, P = 0.0143), and history of vaccination with rubella (Sup2 = 8.2669, P = 0.0040). Life/ working pressure (Sup2 = 11.6018, P = 0.0007), Economic pressure (Sup2 = 12.9845, P = 0.0003). Based on the multi-factor logistic regression analysis, there are statistical significance: in the region, the urban development new area (OR = 1.641), the northeast-Chongqing ecological conservation and development area (OR = 1.65), and the southeast-southeast ecological protection area (OR = 2.028) are relative to the core area of the urban function, and the history of the hepatitis B disease is the risk factor of the female risk group; The high school (OR = 0.114) and the university (OR = 0.371) in the degree of culture were compared with the primary and the following, and the worker was relative to the farmer (OR = 0.656), and the rubella vaccination (OR = 0.686) was the protection factor for the female risk population. Conclusion The present study analyzed the health status and risk of 9384 (4692 couples) in Chongqing, and analyzed the relevant risk factors from the social and demographic characteristics, physical examination and laboratory examination, and classified them according to the risk factors. The following conclusions are drawn:1. The results of health examination and risk assessment show that the overall health status of the pregnant population in Chongqing is good, and the proportion of the risk population is lower; In the pregnant population of Chongqing, the proportion of women in the risk group is higher than that of the male, and the pre-pregnancy health-care work of the pregnant population of the female plan should be strengthened to guide the female to enhance the awareness of the quality and care and increase the utilization rate of the health care service; Hepatitis B disease history, obesity, hypertension are the main risk factors of the male risk population. Age-appropriate fertility, proper environment and positive anti-hepatitis B antibody are the protective factors of the male risk population. To strengthen the publicity and education of men, strengthen the health management of the male plan pregnant population, and avoid the risk factors;4. The risk factors of the female risk group are the history of the hepatitis B disease, the backward of the regional economy and the occupational exposure. The protection factor is the high degree of culture, the low occupational exposure and the vaccination of rubella. The education of women should be improved, the self-care consciousness of women should be enhanced, and the self-protection ability should be improved.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R169.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 丁恬 ,王福琳 ,李军 ,李杰;简论人类——环境系统的调控与人群健康[J];山东医科大学学报(社会科学版);1988年01期

2 李一涛;;企业经济效益与人群健康的关系[J];中国城乡企业卫生;1991年01期

3 高全玲,吕同玉;谈社会经济发展状况与人群健康的双向作用关系[J];中国健康教育;1999年01期

4 ;十种不良习惯威胁办公室人群健康[J];科学大观园;2005年17期

5 李新海;环境评价应向人群健康方面发展[J];中国卫生工程学;2001年04期

6 徐莉,张晓琼;人群健康的影响因素及预防对策[J];卫生职业教育;2004年09期

7 周雷,李枫,詹永红,Huhg Armstrong;人群健康与健康决定因素[J];中国健康教育;2004年02期

8 刘宝;蒋烽;胡善联;;人群健康的地区差距[J];中国卫生资源;2006年01期

9 钟南山;;关注精英人群健康[J];中国经贸;2006年09期

10 王敬丽;刘申;傅东波;;社区开展商务楼职业人群健康教育的实践与探索[J];上海预防医学杂志;2007年07期

相关会议论文 前9条

1 曾惠;舒为群;;我国放射性污染与人群健康的现状分析及预测[A];重庆市预防医学会2006年学术交流会论文集[C];2006年

2 汪新丽;;三峡工程的兴建对库区人群健康的影响及防控对策[A];预防医学学科发展蓝皮书(2006卷)[C];2006年

3 郭艳;何伦发;李玉;;新装修家居场所对人群健康的影响[A];2012广东省预防医学会学术年会资料汇编[C];2013年

4 金银龙;刘凡;陈连生;;环境卫生学研究[A];2009-2010公共卫生与预防医学学科发展报告[C];2010年

5 徐汉友;;为了更好地服务好大众 医生的工作模式应尽快改变[A];第五届全国中西医结合变态反应学术会议论文集[C];2011年

6 任柏勇;;外科临床中人性化服务的体会[A];第一届航天医院管理论坛论文汇编[C];2007年

7 徐汉友;;为了更好地服务好大众,医生的工作模式应尽快改变[A];中华医学会第十次全国内分泌学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年

8 赵琦;姜庆五;;高碘与健康[A];中国营养学会营养科研基金项目论文汇编之一[C];2006年

9 廖志恒;范绍佳;;2006~2012年珠三角地区O_3污染对人群健康的影响[A];第31届中国气象学会年会S11 第三届城市气象论坛—城市与环境气象[C];2014年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 北京商报记者 刘亚力;首份城市电力系统人群健康白皮书发布[N];北京商报;2013年

2 本报记者 王薇;电力系统人群健康“消耗”严重(上)[N];中国保险报;2013年

3 丁梁锋 江迪;江苏着手空气污染对人群健康影响进行监测[N];人民政协报;2014年

4 记者 邱凌;加强节假日期间重点人群健康教育[N];朝阳日报;2009年

5 高加平邋顾介铸;人群健康研究项目在泰州启动[N];新华日报;2007年

6 许静邋芮伟芬;4050人群健康问题突出[N];常州日报;2008年

7 记者 高加平邋通讯员 周 涛;泰州人群健康追踪研究项目启动[N];泰州日报;2007年

8 本报记者 刘艳芳;推动中国人群健康改善ILSI中国办事处愿做幕后英雄[N];中国食品报;2013年

9 农工党辽宁省委;上项目,切莫忽视从业人群健康[N];友报;2007年

10 郭芳盛;实施基础调查 发展健康事业[N];大连日报;2008年

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 石修权;Meta分析及生物统计模型在PAHs致人群健康损害危险度评价中的应用研究[D];华中科技大学;2009年

2 白莉;气温对西藏自治区人群健康的影响及脆弱性评估研究[D];中国疾病预防控制中心;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 王羽晗;“以自我管理为主,家庭、社区支持为辅”的干预模式对农村慢病老年人群健康促进的效果研究[D];河北联合大学;2014年

2 李骊;广州市大气污染、气象与逐日人群死亡数的关系研究[D];南方医科大学;2015年

3 蔡晓丽;重庆市计划妊娠人群健康现状及风险因素分析[D];吉林大学;2016年

4 国家喜;住院人群健康需求及医院健康服务策略研究[D];中国人民解放军军医进修学院;2004年

5 周慧霞;突发性大气污染事件人群健康风险评价技术研究[D];中国疾病预防控制中心;2010年

6 杨军;影响我国中老年人群健康需求的因素分析[D];东北财经大学;2013年

7 张妮;某地区镉生态分布与人群健康影响的初步研究[D];北京交通大学;2014年

8 陈玉恒;倒班人群生活方式及健康状况的流行病学调查[D];华中科技大学;2011年

9 徐军;苏州市空气中SO_2、NO_2的人群健康危险度评价[D];苏州大学;2005年

10 刘俊;重庆三峡库区水质污染状况及对人群健康的潜在影响[D];重庆医科大学;2007年



本文编号:2497087

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yufangyixuelunwen/2497087.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b60ab***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com