心理弹性在认知情绪调节策略和军人急性应激反应中的中介作用研究

发布时间：2018-05-01 09:27

  本文选题：应激 + 心理学　； 参考：《中国全科医学》2017年11期

【摘要】：目的探讨认知情绪调节策略、心理弹性和军人急性应激反应之间的关系。方法采用便利抽样法,抽取某军区1 553名官兵进行团体问卷测试,测试时间为参加某军演前1周内。回收有效问卷1 477份,有效回收率为95.11%。采用认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)、心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)和军人急性应激反应量表对官兵进行测试,运用结构方程分析变量之间的相互关系。结果适应性调节策略高分组应激反应得分高于适应性调节策略低分组(t=-2.14,P=0.03)。非适应性调节策略高分组应激反应得分高于非适应性调节策略低分组(t=-11.93,P0.001)。心理弹性高分组应激反应得分低于心理弹性低分组(t=7.93,P0.001)。应激生理反应和应激心理反应与自强、坚韧、乐观维度均呈负相关(P0.05);与非适应性调节策略、适应性调节策略均呈正相关(P0.05);自强、坚韧、乐观与适应性调节策略呈正相关(P0.05)。非适应性调节策略对应激反应有直接正向影响(β=0.374,P0.01);心理弹性在非适应性调节策略和应激反应之间的中介效应值为-0.260×-0.216≈0.056,中介效应占总效应的比例为13.06%。适应性调节策略直接作用不显著(P0.05),心理弹性在适应性调节策略和应激反应之间的中介效应值为0.484×-0.216≈-0.105。模型拟合良好[χ~2/df=1.059,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)=0.006,比较拟合指数(CFI)=1,拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.998,调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)=0.994,基准化拟合指数(NFI)=0.998,相对拟合指数(RFI)=0.994,增量拟合指数(IFI)=1,Tucker-Lewis拟合指数(TLI)=1]。结论非适应性调节策略对军人急性应激反应既存在直接影响,也通过心理弹性间接影响急性应激反应,适应性调节策略仅通过心理弹性间接影响应激反应。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies, mental resilience and acute stress response in military personnel. Methods 1 553 officers and soldiers in a military region were selected for group questionnaire test by convenience sampling method. The test time was 1 week before participating in a certain military exercise. A total of 1 477 valid questionnaires were collected and the effective recovery rate was 95.11%. The Chinese version of Cognitive emotion Adjustment questionnaire (CERQ-CU), Psychoelasticity scale (REC) and soldiers' Acute stress response scale (ACSR) were used to analyze the relationship between the variables. Results the stress response score of the high score group was higher than that of the low group. The stress response score of the high score group was higher than that of the low group. The stress response score in the high score group was lower than that in the low score group. Stress physiological response and stress psychological response were negatively correlated with self-strengthening, tenacity and optimism; with non-adaptive regulation strategies, adaptive adjustment strategies were positively correlated with P0.05; self-strengthening, tenacity, optimism and adaptive regulatory strategies were positively correlated with P0.05. Non-adaptive regulation strategy had direct positive effect on stress response (尾 -0.374) P0.01.The mediating effect of psychological elasticity between non-adaptive regulation strategy and stress response was -0.260 脳 -0.216 鈮，

本文编号：1828751