精神疾病司法鉴定启动程序实证研究——以382份刑事判决书及案例为样本

发布时间：2018-06-29 04:47

本文选题：精神疾病司法鉴定 + 鉴定启动程序　；参考：《法律适用》2017年23期

【摘要】：基于大数据分析的实证研究方法,对近年来人民法院启动与不启动精神疾病司法鉴定的案例进行比对,发现法官不愿启动此类鉴定的原因包括三种"担忧",即对鉴定可靠度的担忧,对强制医疗程序不完善的担忧,对社会舆论的担忧。一旦启动鉴定可能引发重复鉴定的顽疾;一旦鉴定为依法不负刑事责任的精神病患者,行为人将得不到妥善收治;一旦行为人不负刑事责任,将受到来自被害人家属及社会舆论的压力。基于履行社会管理职能的考虑,法官对该类鉴定的启动谨小慎微。此项制度的改造应当在保留司法机关启动模式的基础上,通过立法明确启动鉴定的条件,规定法官不同意启动鉴定时说理的义务,赋予当事人就不启动鉴定向上一级法院提起上诉的权利。
[Abstract]:Based on the empirical research method of big data analysis, the cases of people's court initiating and not initiating forensic identification of mental illness in recent years are compared. The reasons for finding that judges are unwilling to initiate such tests include three "concerns", namely, concerns about the reliability of the tests, concerns about the imperfections of compulsory medical procedures and concerns about public opinion. Once the identification is initiated, it may lead to persistent diseases that may lead to repeated identification; once the person is identified as a mentally ill person who is legally not criminally responsible, the perpetrator will not be properly treated; and once the perpetrator is not criminally responsible, Will be under pressure from the victim's family and public opinion. Based on the consideration of performing social management function, judges are cautious about the initiation of this kind of appraisal. The reform of this system should be based on retaining the starting mode of judicial organs, making clear the conditions for the initiation of identification through legislation, and stipulating the obligation of the judge not to agree to the reasoning when initiating the appraisal. Endow the parties with the right to appeal against the failure to initiate a higher court of appraisal.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学中国法治战略研究中心;
【基金】：2017年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“司法鉴定意见可采性问题实证研究”(批准号:17BFX063)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D919.3

【相似文献】